Your interpretation of my arguments make it sound like I'm expecting instantaneous changes or a complete overnight upheaval of the agriculture industry. Again, you're responding as if I expected these companies to have emergency pandemic plans in place (which I do expect they should have by this time next year)
You are very contradictory in one single post. Yes, I know in a literal since "overnight" and "one year" aren't the same, but they are the same when you are talking about implementing policy that has never been implemented before. You ARE expecting them to have a solution "overnight" if you want them to have a plan in place while they are still shut down in some regions and there is still a freaking pandemic occurring. Not only occurring, but increasing and spreading like wildfire currently.
"Yes please focus on this while the world is burning around you and there are bigger issues going on." That is quite literally what you are expecting.
It took ~70 years to go from 10,000 slaughterhouses to 2700 and our population exploded in the meantime. Agriculture has looked different at many points in time throughout human history, it's foolish and short-sighted to believe that the current system will persist indefinitely. 5000 years ago rabbits were a keystone domestic food animal species.
What exactly is your point here? I don't think anyone has said "let's never change what we have now". Actually I know no one has said that. Yeah, life changes over decades, centuries and millenia, of course it does. Are you trying to make a point about that?
Personally I am of the opinion (as are many environmental scientists) that the current system is objectively unsustainable. The demand for animal protein will outpace our environments' capacity to provide it. Not to start another controversial topic on the current global environmental crisis, but it simply can't be solved without addressing the agriculture industry.
Humans have been outliving the Earth's resources for decades. Again, what is your point? I have already addressed this. You want less agriculture you need less humans.
You want less water used, you need less humans
You want less oil used, you need less humans
You want less electricity used, you need less humans
You want less air pollution, you need less humans
I can keep going.
The entire environmental crisis can be parsed down to "we have too many humans on Earth". Period. This isn't just a demand for animal protein. Demand for vegetable and fruit also decimates the planet as we don't have people really hand picking fields or hand towing fields anymore. We have large machines doing that. The fertilized ability of land gets used up after each crop is harvested, it is why crop rotation is a big thing. It is why those that do argue that all human life can be sustained on a vegetarian diet are wrong. There is only so much fertile land on Earth and with what is available it wouldn't be able to grow enough crop to feed the population of humans we currently have, not only that it would require clearing large amounts of currently protected forests. Not only that be plant growth and crop farming leads to erosion and other environmental impacts that many don't discuss.
As humans, we have managed to realize that population control is necessary for every species on the planet. We control forests, deserts, deer, elk, invasive species, non-invasive one, cats, dogs, etc and so on. The only animal species we have failed to realize needs to be controlled as well is the human species. We will outgrow our capacity. Period. We have known this fact for a long time.
I didn't expect any industry to be prepared for this pandemic, although people have predicted for decades there would be a novel respiratory pandemic. At this point in time I can make a similar prediction and essentially guarantee it: there will be another novel respiratory pandemic. So what I damn sure expect now is that the Ag industry, which utterly and completely imploded over the last few months, is DOING SOMETHING to mitigate these events in the future. We have seen the result of the current system stressed to it's limits. It failed, plain and simple. I'm not blaming anyone for what happened currently, but if this happens again 20 or 25 years from now do you really want to see the same result?
Why not? Seriously why did you not expect them to be prepared? If it has not only been predicted for decades (it has not arguing here), it has even occurred within the last decade, why weren't you expecting them to be prepared?
Everyone can make that prediction, novel respiratory viruses happen every so many years. It is a fact, not a prediction.
The point I have been making is there isn't anything for them to "do". I have countered all your arguments and you just double down and repeat them without addressing the counter points, so I will be more detailed.
1. Increasing abattoirs will not work. These facilities require a certain number of people working in small enclosed work environments. There really isn't a way to "socially distance". These establishments are at high risk for quick and easy spread of a human pandemic. As we have seen. It does not matter if you have 10,000 of them or 2,500 of them. Does not matter. You still need x number of people at each location to make it function. You also would need 10K veterinarians to oversee these facilities. Are you prepared to become a meat inspection veterinarian? Just because you can build the facility doesn't mean you can make them work, staff them or have the necessary bodies needed for them to function.
It is like the demand to increase ventilators, yes, we need to increase ventilators but we quite literally have a stop point in which you will only have so many people trained to be able to actually place a person on and monitor them on the ventilator. There is a human limit on these things too. You can have 100 million ventilators eventually but if you only have 1000 people who can operate them, you have 1000 ventilators.
Plus you made the argument that Trump's executive order to force people to go back to work in these facilities was unwise, which it was, but want to argue to make more of them and send more people into harm's way? I don't understand.
2. You can't just build buildings on a farm for a "we might need this to house 1000's of animals in case a pandemic hits". First reason being there likely isn't the space. Second, pig operations have very strict growth and sanitary protocols with pigs of a certain size/age in one building, then moving to the next when at the next stage of growth and in between each movement of the pigs as they reach the different period of growth there is a complete sanitary clean out of the prior building to eliminate any potential disease spread between groups at different points in the growing cycle. So now you are going to need an unlimited number of buildings to maybe hold mature pigs for an undetermined amount of time and as these get crowded out from the pigs growing, they will become stressed, attack one another, become diseased and potentially spread that disease across the farm, again a huge loss. The third reason, meat animals have a time limit. Like milk. Or medication. Quite literally an expiration date. Pigs after a certain size and age can not be used in slaughter anymore. You can't ask a farmer to continue to spend $$$ feeding a pig that should have been slaughtered weeks prior until there is a place for them to maybe go, maybe not. He will lose money on feeding/caring for that animal as well as the money he would have made selling that pig for slaughter. You will make farmers go bankrupt. Get it now?
3. We have already addressed why slaughter on farm isn't an option, not going to get into that. Even then you'd have to expect a farmer to purchase and store a large amount of meat in giant freezers that would be cost-prohibitive to his farm.
4. Quite literally the option is mass depopulation when these things occur. Now, we can get into that there might be a better option than VSD, which there may be, but it has not as of yet, been determined what that option is. If you want to give input on a better option, go for it, but criticism alone is of no help. Screaming "this is wrong" is not of any help. Like throwing a cup of water on a wildfire. So either brain storm, no one is asking you to give up your career aspirations to brain storm other options. You don't have to be a pig vet to say to "hey I thought of x for this issue, do you think that might work why or why not?"
In regards to Trump's executive order, you don't think a federal order under the Defense Appropriations Act, which authorizes the Secretary of Agriculture to enforce plants remaining open, would be cause to throw out a lawsuit from an employee? and start bussing abattoirs across the country. I'm speaking out about this now, because I don't want to see history repeat itself in the future. Is it too much to expect this industry to be proactive about their role in this?
Forcing places to be open and absolving them of responsibility are not one in the same. The President can't create and sign anything into law. An executive order, is not a law. It is literally saying that his Secretary of Agriculture can control the opening of food processing plants. It is not a law, interpretation of a law and does not absolve anyone of anything they might be accused of. The order also specifically states that these facilities have to provide the recommended protections to the employees as outlined by the CDC, so if they aren't following CDC guidelines, they can be sued.
So, yes, I do believe this executive order is just that allowing the Secretary of Agriculture to oversee opening of facilities.
I don't know what you mean by "bussing" abattoirs, but already touched upon why increase number seem great in theory but maybe not functional in reality.
This history will repeat itself. I expect it to, everyone should expect it to. Probably later this year during hurricane season the food supply will be hit a little, in a smaller impact so most don't notice it, but it will take a hit. This is the reality of food production on a scale needed to feed a global population of 7.8 billion people and we still aren't even able to feed everyone. I don't know why you think this is the first time mass depopulation of food animals has occurred, this happens, not just in response to pandemics, but also after massive floods, tornadoes, hurricanes, etc. This will repeat itself, many times. Many times. This has been one of the many predicted outcomes of having too many humans on Earth. We are slowly killing ourselves, it will happen. It will either be via something like this and mass starvation, because there is no way to make a sustainable, fool proof, accident proof, pandemic proof, famine proof food supply. Or via literally heating ourselves off the planet. Or via heating the planet enough there are enough natural disasters that wipe us all out.
Again, the answer here is human population control, and no, I am not suggesting genocide or killing people but limiting births and family sizes would be a terrific start.
I am fully aware of the commitment to public health that is described in the veterinarians oath. The enmeshment of both human and animal welfare is one reason I am in this field and I can accept that animals may suffer and die if it is for the purposes of ensuring public health. I would never suggest that animal lives should ever, at any time, be prioritized over human lives. Clearly the pandemic has impacted every service and industry across the globe. I'm advocating for these pigs because I think we're capable of doing better in the future.
I'm not even ok with how quickly the veterinary community flipped over to public health and public health only and allowed such severe suffering of animals. It has been heart breaking to be honest, in my opinion. Honestly, with what I have seen, these pigs had the better end of the deal compared to some of the animals I have seen.
We can't even do better for humans and I get it, resources are limited. It would be wonderful to have a stockpile of ventilators, PPE and certain medications. But medications are expensive and they expire and dumping hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of propofol, methocarbamol, fentanyl, versed, etc each time they expire and a pandemic has not occurred would not be wise or financially acceptable.
I know many veterinary clinics that are wiped out of medications so much so that they just can't treat certain cases. The medications are on widespread backorder. It is awful.
We have overwhelmed hospital and medical facilities, over 100,000 dead people in 3 months time and while the loss of all that food was horrible, in the grand scheme of what is occurring, I think we have a lot to fix and address elsewhere first.