OP, I've been reading this thread and your other one about Excelsior. Please settle down and stop posting inflammatory responses whenever someone teases you or gives you advice you don't like. This is an anonymous internet forum! If you can't handle some good-natured ribbing on SDN with grace, you're gonna have an absolute meltdown the first time you get pimped on rounds (assuming you get that far).
Numerous people on both threads have given you the same advice: you may be able to find a four-year institution that will accept two years' worth of your existing credits, but no school that's capable of helping you get into med school is going to accept more than that. You can try to blaze a new trail if you want; that's perfectly within your rights. But the tried-and-true path is the one that works for thousands of applicants every year. Those who go off the beaten path don't even get interviews, much less acceptances. You can disagree with everyone on this forum all day long, but the advice isn't going to change.
Let me give you some context about why the tried-and-true path (i.e., a bachelor's degree from a traditional four-year institution) is the only realistic way to go. At my school, we receive nearly 10,000 applications every year for about 125 spots in our matriculating class. Read those numbers again: they weren't a typo. With that many outstanding applicants, we can afford to be very, very picky! We choose students who are very likely to succeed in med school, residency, and a lifelong clinical practice. Those are almost always very traditional applicants. The ones who went off the beaten path are seen as riskier options. Why would we choose "risky" when we can choose "safe"? This is why people here keep telling you to go to a traditional four-year school.
Again, please calm down and stop reacting so strongly to people's posts. If you don't like what someone has to say, use your own mental "ignore" function or the one provided by the forum.
