- Joined
- Dec 19, 2004
- Messages
- 10,410
- Reaction score
- 4,039
Don't even bring up the federal housing administration (FHA). They may need a government bailout soon:
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/13/business/study-shows-a-pattern-of-risky-loans-by-fha.html
Since the FHA is losing money, they are going to tighten their standards:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324407504578187780598179510.html?mod=googlenews_wsj
They are going to require more down payment and increase insurance premium.
Oh you and your government agency collapse theories, I'm beginning to think you're a bit paranoid.
Standards have already tightened, anyway (look up exclusion rules).
I can't believe people would buy a house with just 3.5% down payment. You are going to pay a lot more interest and with insurance premium, your monthly payment is going to be much higher. No wonder these people can't pay their mortgage and FHA is losing money.
Yah PMI, but that goes away once your LTV is 80%.
But yup people use these loans...a lot. My friends just put $5000 down payment on a house in Vegas. Dirt ass cheap...but the key there is buying was cheaper than renting, so technically they put themselves in a better position financially.
BTW, the "house" you posted is not really a house. It's a condo/townhouse which means you will have to pay HOA fee (average $200-500 per month) depending on the location.
It's classed as an SFR (not a condo or a PUD). Just saw the HOA dues now, hypothetical pharmacist can still afford it since I was conservative on my calcs originally (or just eat out less, i dunno).
Sooooo.....do you still think the indebted pharmacist can't afford a nice home in LA County? Unless your definition of nice = 10 room McMasion with SHC's purses taking up a whole walk-in closet.