Way to be a a$$hole, and apparently one who doesn't read much either.
For the OP, let's get into it a little:
1) Distal radius fractures - standard is closed reduction, except in the elderly and low-demand patients. Take a look at the abstract below, straight out of Wheeless off the Duke website (which apparently asdf123 doesn't read).
Acta Orthop Scand. 2003 Feb;74(1):98-100. "Fractures of the distal radius in low-demand elderly patients: closed reduction of no value in 53 of 60 wrists." Beumer A, McQueen MM.
To determine the value of reduction of fractures of the distal radius in the very elderly and low-demand or demented patient, we assessed 60 fractures in 59 patients for the reduction achieved and maintained. The mean patient age was 82 (65-93) years. All fractures were initially reduced under regional or general anaesthesia. In 44 dorsally displaced fractures, reduction failed in 7 cases initially, and 37 lost reduction during the following weeks of immobilisation in plaster. In 9 wrists with volarly displaced fractures, reduction was achieved in 6; all malunited. A total of 53/60 fractures healed in a malunited position. We found no correlation between fracture classification, initial displacement, and final radiographical outcome. On the basis of these observations we conclude that reduction of fractures of the distal radius is of minimal value in the very old and frail, dependent or demented patient.
2) Associated fractures of the ulnar styloid - depends on the location of the fracture. Distal ulnar styloid avulsion fractures are considered stable and do not require operative intervention or manipulation. However, fractures at the base of the ulnar styloid run the risk of destabilizing the DRUJ, and require operative fixation.
All in all, I think the answer is ORIF. Closed reduction has a high likelihood of failure given the patient's age. I'm not too far along, so don't know the criteria for IM nailing of radius fractures off the top of my head, but have never seen a simple Colles treated so dramatically, especially given the availability of very nice plate sets. Skeletal traction is a bad answer. That leaves ORIF.