Hey JBJ...just for your info the only subsidized loans that are paid for by taxpayers are stafford subsidized loans (hence the name) with the yearly limit being $8,500.00 per year. However, the private loans are not supported by
ANY tax dollars.
NO those are paid for entirely by the person receiving the loan. Thus your eloquent point is moot.
Second moot point.... defaulted private loans are not paid for by the government either (They are not guaranteed by the government). No, when you default on a private loan it is paid for by the business issuing the loan. This company, of course, has an insurance policy on your loan so even if you default they still get paid.
Lastly, Even if in some fairytale land they up the limits on subsidized loans and the taxpayers end up paying more...how much money in taxes do you think a physician earning $350,000/year pays in their life time? I am sure that it is more than $10,000.
Still talking about tax dollars because a person is not allowed to take out private loans (see above) many students both single and othewise do things like for go medical insurance (at least $2000/year) and instead are on Medicaid. There is a brilliant plan. Next there are several I know on foodstamps, WIC, and other forms of government aid. So you are suggesting that by not letting the students take out more private loans the taxpayers will pay less? (This is a critical thinking test
)
I don't think that anyone here is not willing to do all it takes (jobs, etc.) to make it work...the point is that it could be just a bit easier, not much, just a smidge.