- Joined
- Jul 22, 2003
- Messages
- 1,973
- Reaction score
- 854
I'm hearing conflicting stories about residency. On the one hand, the 120-hour-a-week figure is common, and people say that many programs blatantly disregard the new ACGME rules. Lots of doctors have horror stories about that 35th hour on call, so bleary-eyed they didn't know what they were doing. In the second article linked to in this post, Troy Madsen, the guy who blew the whistle on the Hopkins IM program, says he almost made a crucial mistake on his 32nd hour of call and refers to "being awake for 30 consecutive hours."
On the other hand, some people have led me to believe that it's not (nor was it even in the past) that bad. My uncle did an IM residency at a prestigious university hospital in the late 80's, and he shrugs off my mention of the horror stories about being on your feet 36 hours straight, saying "oh, there's always time to sleep." Given what some people say about residency, this would be a laughable statement, but he laughs at the notion that a resident would be awake for 30 consecutive hours. Also, I've heard that, depending on the rotation, there can be a lot of down time during residency--you're not necessarily rushing frome one thing to the next nonstop the whole time you're in the hospital; rather, there are periods during which you're just sitting around, shooting the breeze with fellow residents or reading up on your speciality, waiting for something to happen. On this view, it would seem the burden of residency is primarily the large number of hours one is required to spend in the hospital, as opposed to the crushing avalanche of stressful work. (I.e., yes, it stinks to have to be away from home/your wife and kids/friends/whatever for 36 hours straight, but it's not like you get no sleep during those 36 hours.)
So which view is closer to the truth? Or do conditions vary widely between programs/specialities?
On the other hand, some people have led me to believe that it's not (nor was it even in the past) that bad. My uncle did an IM residency at a prestigious university hospital in the late 80's, and he shrugs off my mention of the horror stories about being on your feet 36 hours straight, saying "oh, there's always time to sleep." Given what some people say about residency, this would be a laughable statement, but he laughs at the notion that a resident would be awake for 30 consecutive hours. Also, I've heard that, depending on the rotation, there can be a lot of down time during residency--you're not necessarily rushing frome one thing to the next nonstop the whole time you're in the hospital; rather, there are periods during which you're just sitting around, shooting the breeze with fellow residents or reading up on your speciality, waiting for something to happen. On this view, it would seem the burden of residency is primarily the large number of hours one is required to spend in the hospital, as opposed to the crushing avalanche of stressful work. (I.e., yes, it stinks to have to be away from home/your wife and kids/friends/whatever for 36 hours straight, but it's not like you get no sleep during those 36 hours.)
So which view is closer to the truth? Or do conditions vary widely between programs/specialities?