- Joined
- Jun 15, 2004
- Messages
- 85
- Reaction score
- 1
Heard it is a small clinically oriented program. Middle of the road. Wake, UVa, UNC, Emory, and Vandy are much better in the area.
UCLA harbor invite yesterday.
BTW: any thoughts on the strength of Mayo Scottsdale program?
Yes, It is the clinical track with Harbor+Kaiser.
UCLA Olive View today as well.
Some programs send itinerary that includes the faculty who will be interviewing us and some don't. Is OK to ask which faculty will be interviewing us, days prior to interview? Is OK to ask to meet with specific faculty in a program to meet with?
Called CCF yesterday, they are still reviewing and sending out interviews...I will keep my fingers crossed! I think Hopkins are notorious for sending out interviews very late..
Did anyone hear from OHSU?
Interviews - north shore lij, Montefiore north division. 6 Ivs so far.
Don't know about tulane n Cincinnati but Wisconsin is done with sending interviewsThink they sent out iv/rejections last week.
Anyone hear from univ of cincinnati, tulane, wisconsin?
They'll probably cancel your interview if you ask that question.
OK...seriously, of course it's OK. They may not know the answer (or it may change on the day of the interview) but it doesn't hurt to ask ahead of time.
From my own experience though, don't spend too much time reading the last few papers people who will interview you have published. Just get the gist of what they do and are interested in and you'll be fine. The more you read, the more likely you are to not interview with somebody.
Seems like interviews have started to slow down as most of the places have already sent out invitations...
Has anyone been to Baylor, Houston? Seems it is very busy, lots of hands-on experience, rotating 4 hospitals... but are they strong in research, good for launching academic career? I think you can only do some electives at MD Anderson, and may befriend many people being in Texa Medical Center... but how is the program itself?
Does anyone know anything about the wash u heme/onc program?
I saw a previous post on the signficance of Comprehensive NCI cancer center designation . How about NCCN particpation? What aspect does NCCN participation affect for cancer centers and how does filter down to the fellowship programs?
I actually brought up this point with the director of our Cancer Institute the other day. You may have heard of him...he's the guy who discovered Gleevec.
Anyhoo, I asked about both NCI CCC and NCCN designations and their importance. He pointed out that the primary difference between an NCI CC and CCC (we are a CC) is an education/community outreach component, NOT research or patient care. So unless you're also doing an MPH or MSW during your fellowship, the difference between these two is unlikely to affect you in any meaningful way (see this link for details).
As for NCCN status, it too doesn't really do much other than allow faculty at the institution to sit on the various disease-specific NCCN advisory boards that develop the guidelines. Interestingly, fellows from any institution are also invited to participate in the annual NCCN meetings and we (a non-NCCN institution for the time being) have had one fellow attend and contribute to guidelines each of the last 3 years.
So don't get too hung up on the Cancer Center vs. Comprehensive Cancer Center or NCCN thing.
Druker is great, heard him speak once, a real class act, youre lucky to have him at OHSU (its hard to keep these guys away from MSKCC, MDACC, DFCI, or for your region, the Hutch)
I do disagree slightly on the NCCN affiliation, but moreso in the general context of a program being a part of ECOG or SWOG or CALGB. I think if you want to have a career in academics, it is important to be at an institution that is a part of these cooperative groups. More and more, the ability for a single institution, even an MSKCC and MDACC, to run a phase 2 or 3 trial by itself is diminished. So being a part of one of these groups is important if you want to do research. Also, you get to work with a lot of other important researchers at other institutions through the group, which can only help in terms of finding a career.
He actually gave us (the fellows) a really great explanation of how/why he ended up at OHSU. He was at the Farber, had a faculty gig, was one of the "golden boys" (my words, not his) who could have carried on there comfortably for an entire career. But he knew he'd never be able to direct anything there...he was golden, not platinum...and would be at the mercy of other senior faculty members until they left (unlikely) or died. So he went somewhere that he felt he could make a real difference in a variety of ways.
2 different issues. NCCN is one thing. Being part of a cooperative group (we participate in SWOG, CALGB, ACOSOG, RTOG, CTN and soon ECOG) is another and they have nothing to do with each other. I agree that if you want a serious academic career (particularly one with clinical research) you need to be in a place that is part of a cooperative group. But NCCN membership has nothing to do with that.
On a related note, I have a Phase II trial about to go live that is not part of a cooperative group (although it is an industry funded, investigator initiated trial) and several of our faculty (like a dozen or so) have similar trials ongoing. It's rare for the cooperative groups to sponsor anything other than Phase III trials, most Phase I/II trials are a combination of institutionally and industry sponsored.
Has anyone heard from Indiana, Alabama, Little Rock, or UT Memphis?
Anyone heard from Mt. Sinai or St. Luke?