Both sides in this arguement need a dose of humility. I've worked in a ten bed critical access hospital and major tertiary care center with an ICU larger than my current 88 bed hospital. Critical care has a different standard in all of them. It is arrogant to insinuate that you can define the scope of practice for someone else (and if you are basing the acuity of a DKA patient on pH alone, then you haven't managed enough DKA). I have a huge problem with anyone coming along and defining my scope, and every time I've seen anyone try, it was based on arrogance and money, not patient care. If you don't believe it, come to my hospital and just try to get an uninsured patient transferred at three in the morning.
Medicinedoc, I think I understand what you are trying to convey. I agree that FP's belong in the ICU. Closed ICU's and mandatory CC consults are crap. However, implying that CC is useless is very similar to saying that NP's can take the place of FP's. If you've never been a situation were your butt puckered enough to make you wish you had some help, then you haven't done enough CC.
Medicinedoc, I think I understand what you are trying to convey. I agree that FP's belong in the ICU. Closed ICU's and mandatory CC consults are crap. However, implying that CC is useless is very similar to saying that NP's can take the place of FP's. If you've never been a situation were your butt puckered enough to make you wish you had some help, then you haven't done enough CC.