Hello. I was recently told to establish a relationship with a financial advisor during my last year of med school. My mentor said it is a smart way to go since "doctors alway seem to think they know how to manage their money." Any thoughts?
Hello. I was recently told to establish a relationship with a financial advisor during my last year of med school. My mentor said it is a smart way to go since "doctors alway seem to think they know how to manage their money." Any thoughts?
Don't forget that you also need to sock everything in a Roth and 403b during residency either
There are "fee-only" advisors and I suggest those are the only way you should good. Those are flat fees you pay. Usually cheaper but don't expect much. Make sure they are CERTIFIED with multiple credentials (particularly NAPFA) but for your purposes I would go with regular mutal funds or something of the sort in a portfolio.
Don't forget that you also need to sock everything in a Roth and 403b during residency either
I disagree. If you have discretionary income during residency, your first priority is student loans. As much as it seems like a good idea to put money away for retirement, your first objective should be to eliminate debt first, or the interest on your debt will, in effect, cancel out what you make off of your investments. To further complicate this, many people will be purchasing a home during residency, which is increasing debt. This further prioritizes debt elimination. If you still have discretionary income after this, or you don't have student loans or any other debt, then you put money into 401(K) or 403(B) up to company match, then switch to Roth up to limit, then back to 401(K) / 403(B) up to the limit. After that, look into other investments. At least, that is the best way to maximize your money.
Can't make blanket statement.
IT depends upon how much discretionary income. Depends upon the amount, and rate of student loans.
You should always put a portion towards 401K, especially if matching. At the same time, look at the rate of student loans vs rate of other debts. Take into account the tax deductibilty, then correlate the final post-tax rate on debt, vs post-tax rate on investments, and do the math.
OH - And NEVER pay down your mortgage. Interest only during residency on your primary home, unless you have a lot of discretionary income.
There is no clear answer here and I would get an accountant to help weight the best options. I do not suggest any financial advisor at this time. Unless you have $100K liquid at a minimum, no need to pay fees for advisors.
You just made a blanket statement.
For the practice group I joined (Emergency Medicine), one of the selling points is that the group covers financial advising from Charles Schwab (and not the bargain-basement) for retirement planning/future planning. As the group president put it (as close as I can remember): "We were going to pay for gym memberships, but we figured most people were more savvy about picking a gym than they were for financial advising."
and a part of which i personally disagree with. i know that pre-paying a mortgage is bad, because you lose both the tax deductability of the interest as well as the ability to earn more money investing the excess, but I myself plan to get rid of my mortgage as soon as possible - it's more of a psychological thing. maybe if interest rates go to like 1%, i would take out a giant mortgage to capitalize on basically free money.
Paying down unsubsidized and high rate loans should be a priority. If you have an 8% loan, paying it off is an 8% guaranteed investment. You won't find that anywhere else.
I opted to fund Roth IRAs rather than pay down loans because once I become a civilian physician I won't qualify to put money in an IRA. That tax-deferred money is HUGE for a physician. I currently fully fund my tax-free and tax-deferred accounts AND pay extra on the mortgage, but if I had to choose one, I would definitely fund the Roth first. Super valuable for a doc.
Of course, anytime you hold a loan AND buy stocks, you are in effect buying stocks on margin. So keep that in mind.
A brilliant Schwab adviser pulled off a major coup there. I recently rescued my father and his investments from a Charles Schwab advisor who was sucking off 1.5-2% a year with his wrap account fees and commissions.
Please don't make the mistake of trusting someone who works for a for-profit brokerage house to give you competent financial advice. You spent too many nights on trauma call to give your money away like that.
IT depends upon how much discretionary income. Depends upon the amount, and rate of student loans.
You should always put a portion towards 401K, especially if matching. At the same time, look at the rate of student loans vs rate of other debts. Take into account the tax deductibilty, then correlate the final post-tax rate on debt, vs post-tax rate on investments, and do the math.
OH - And NEVER pay down your mortgage. Interest only during residency on your primary home, unless you have a lot of discretionary income.
There is no clear answer here and I would get an accountant to help weight the best options. I do not suggest any financial advisor at this time. Unless you have $100K liquid at a minimum, no need to pay fees for advisors.
Paying down unsubsidized and high rate loans should be a priority. If you have an 8% loan, paying it off is an 8% guaranteed investment. You won't find that anywhere else.
I opted to fund Roth IRAs rather than pay down loans because once I become a civilian physician I won't qualify to put money in an IRA. That tax-deferred money is HUGE for a physician. I currently fully fund my tax-free and tax-deferred accounts AND pay extra on the mortgage, but if I had to choose one, I would definitely fund the Roth first. Super valuable for a doc.
Of course, anytime you hold a loan AND buy stocks, you are in effect buying stocks on margin. So keep that in mind.
I have to say that I agree with these two posters. Everyone has their own personal standpoint on finance. I for one will never ever pre-pay a mortgage if I have student loans outstanding. And I will probably not pay my federal student loans off until the private ones are paid off. I won't start paying down the private loans until my higher credit cards are paid off. Just my philosophy in minimizing interest. Of course you also have to take into account the balances on these vehicles and rearrange accordingly
In residency your retirement should come first for reasons that Desperado pointed out.
Financial planners can be a good way to go but I'm surprised that no one has commented on the fixed fee financial planners. You can't get anything for free but there are some great planners out there. But you as the consumer have to do your own homework and understand what you are getting yourself into and be proactive for finding information.
I disagree. If you have discretionary income during residency, your first priority is student loans. As much as it seems like a good idea to put money away for retirement, your first objective should be to eliminate debt first, or the interest on your debt will, in effect, cancel out what you make off of your investments. To further complicate this, many people will be purchasing a home during residency, which is increasing debt. This further prioritizes debt elimination. If you still have discretionary income after this, or you don't have student loans or any other debt, then you put money into 401(K) or 403(B) up to company match, then switch to Roth up to limit, then back to 401(K) / 403(B) up to the limit. After that, look into other investments. At least, that is the best way to maximize your money.
Can't make blanket statement.
IT depends upon how much discretionary income. Depends upon the amount, and rate of student loans.
You should always put a portion towards 401K, especially if matching. At the same time, look at the rate of student loans vs rate of other debts. Take into account the tax deductibilty, then correlate the final post-tax rate on debt, vs post-tax rate on investments, and do the math.
OH - And NEVER pay down your mortgage. Interest only during residency on your primary home, unless you have a lot of discretionary income.
There is no clear answer here and I would get an accountant to help weight the best options. I do not suggest any financial advisor at this time. Unless you have $100K liquid at a minimum, no need to pay fees for advisors.
The reasoning for never paying your mortgage? Paying interest only is basically RENTING. You are just paying the bank some cash but You are building no equity. And if you only want to rent, why not just RENT a place and skip the insurance fees and property taxes? (And not have to mow your own grass/shovel the sidewalks.)
If you have an 8% loan, paying it off is an 8% guaranteed investment. You won't find that anywhere else.
I opted to fund Roth IRAs rather than pay down loans because once I become a civilian physician I won't qualify to put money in an IRA. That tax-deferred money is HUGE for a physician. I currently fully fund my tax-free and tax-deferred accounts AND pay extra on the mortgage, but if I had to choose one, I would definitely fund the Roth first. Super valuable for a doc.
assuming that your property does not appreciate. which it does. in some cases, a lot. but not so much anymore.
LOL. I'm an idiot. I was in post-real estate bubble thoughts. Real estate speculation should be done BEFORE a bull run.. not after a bull run in my point of view. But if you get a residency where you expect a run up, go for it.. If you plan on living there, I recommend building equity instead of paying INTEREST only.. Its also a good way to not "Stretch" your money and live a lifestyle you cannot afford as most INTEREST only people are doing currently.
Very true. Risk takers can be rewarded but eventually the law of averages will catch up to MOST people getting 10-50% gains.
I agree but you might want to check out this article. Physicians will be able to invest in Roth!
http://money.cnn.com/magazines/mone...8/01/8382153/index.htm?postversion=2006072412
(MONEY Magazine) -- For the first time since Roth IRAs were introduced almost 10 years ago, politicians are finally ready to give everybody the chance to save in these accounts.
In May, Congress eliminated the restriction barring anyone who makes more than $100,000 from converting a traditional IRA to a Roth IRA. Now no matter what your income is, you'll be able to enjoy the chief benefit of a Roth: tax-free income when you retire.
Call me a Roth-o-maniac, but I think you should probably take Washington up on the offer.
A couple of notes: First, the new provision doesn't kick in until 2010. Second, the new law dealt only with conversions, leaving in place rules that prevent you from contributing to a regular Roth account each year if your income is $110,000 or more ($160,000 for couples).
But there's an easy way around this. Just open a nondeductible IRA - which anyone with earned income can do - and then convert it to a Roth.
So by 2010 everyone will be able to have a Roth one way or another.
I'm sure some of you guys are aware of this, but you can not write covered calls on mutal funds, you can however on EFTs. Here is a way to beat 95% of the money mangers. Use tech and fund analysis to find solid EFTs, buy them and write covered calls.
this is what i did for my mom. she had the majority of her retirement investments in ucsf 403(b), 457, and 401(a) accounts - i simply rolled it all over to a fidelity ira. she's got more investment choices now, and come 2010, converting to a roth will be as easy as checking a box online.
Yes you will, but technically if you play it right you can have other deductions to offset part of the taxes. Better to pay them now while you are working and can afford it then when you are on a fixed income with retirement.But aren't you going to have to pay taxes in 2010 on the conversion?
Yes you will, but technically if you play it right you can have other deductions to offset part of the taxes. Better to pay them now while you are working and can afford it then when you are on a fixed income with retirement.
Very true. Risk takers can be rewarded but eventually the law of averages will catch up to MOST people getting 10-50% gains.
I agree but you might want to check out this article. Physicians will be able to invest in Roth!.
What's a covered call?
I have two homes and sold my condo in S Beach 2 years ago. I had my S Beach condo on an Option Arm through WAMU. I was able to pay either interest only, less than that (neg am), fully amortized 15 or fully amortized 30yr. IT was the BEST thing I ever had. Initially it was 2nd home, then became rental. As rent was higher, I did the 15yr amort and took the advertizing, marketing, etc and had a great Schedule E where my losses were taken against my Capital Gains because that year I was below the AMT on my income.
My ANN Arbor home is interest only 3/1 arm. The values have dropped in the last 2 years. If I sell today, then $10K less then when I bought. If I would have put equity into the house via increased principal payments on my mortgage, I would still have paid the same interest, PLUS I would have given the bank "equity" money in my house. Now that Principal over the last 2 years would be with the bank. SO when I sell my house, I get back my downpayment plus (or minus) the extra money I gave the bank. And that Principal given to the bank via mortgage payment earned NOTHING!!!! Instead I invested my money into a secured note paying 1% per month.
No offense, but this is why I asked to start this Financial Forum. Paying down equity into your house is NOT the way to go. THere are three groups of people that should pay down their mortgages:
1) Those making > $750k - $1mil per year that have their retirement, trusts and other securities all established.
2) THose >55-60yrs who have no other debt and are all set-up with their retirement funds.
3) Investment properties where the rent > PITI and they need to match-out the gains/losses on Schedule E.
With interest only loans, you can pay down principal each month if you like. You have more options.
Thanks
Gee, you think I have an opinion on this mortgage investing stuff, eh?
Something 99% of investors don't need to know about.
ETF gives a good explanation but an important point one should know about covered calls is that you retain all the downside potential of the stock/ETF while forfeiting a good portion of the upside potential in exchange for the option premium. You buy a covered call because you don't believe the stock price is going anywhere. If you really don't believe a stock/ETF is going anywhere, why not sell it and buy a bond? Much safer with less downside potential and the same upside potential.