crna making 120000 to 180000

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
PDA for rotations...........$250

Medical school..............$150,000

Knowing that you will provide your patient with top notch care no matter the situation and that you deserve every penny you're paid........................Priceless

Members don't see this ad.
 
OK
I tried to avoid this topic altogether, but had to get my 2 cents in. I am a surgeon, my mom is a CRNA working 3 days/week, and my brother is an attending anesthesiologist in CT.
First, who gives a #^$% is some CRNA is making 180k a year. My brother started at that with 5 weeks vacation, then made partner with a guarante minimum of 400k plus production. I will tell you, and I tell him that I don't think he is worth half that. He gets 13 weeks vacation/year and takes 2 in house calls/month. That is what the market pays him so that's what he gets. My other brother is an executive at EMC corp and has made millions in stock options. If you are looking for real money, get out of medicine... Also if those of you out there going into anes care about a CRNA making a buck fifty, it is peanuts in the reality of the financial world, especially out of medicine.
Second. As a senior surgical residnet at a large university program, with CRNAs and a CRNA training program I will give you my view. I will probably piss off both you anesthesiologists and CRNAs. Just coming off being chief in the ICU, I see a huge difference in the management of a number of the patients that came to the unit who had received the intraop care of a CRNA versus a good anesthesiologists. Granted, I saw a number of poorly managed sick patients by MDs too, but less so. I consistently had patients coming to the unit underresuscitated, hypothermic, hyopoperfused, loaded on epi drips etc under the management of a CRNA. I could give numerous counts. Perhaps these things are not seen by many CRNAs because they are back in the OR with another patient. I spent hours trying to catch up on fluids, correcting coags and so on. I saw this with some of the anes residents here too, but rarely. Despite my brother being an anes doc, I traditionally did not think their medical training was very strong. However, I will tell you the residents here are fairly well trained, and the anes docs actually run the CT ICU and SICU. They can tell you about the management of elevated ICP or necrotizing pancreatitis, and I think it leads to better intraop management. Give me a CRNA that can lead my rounds in the SICU and discuss the disease process of all my patients and I'll lick your ass. That is what I make the 2 year anes residents do here, so that if and when they take care of my patients in the OR they don't drop the ball. Any fool can get a patient through the OR with good looking numbers. Now, some of the CRNAs here are very good, and some of the MDs suck.
Yes, I know CRNAs have to spend at least a year in ICU care, but that is ICU nursing care. There is a huge difference. I have worked with some great ICU nurses both at Columbia and Hopkins, however even the most experienced one has never had to deal with actual clinical decision making. Many of these nurses have spent time in Cardiac ICUs only, which is very cook book care, and relatively easy patients to care for.
On another note, I think if you are at a smaller hospital, dealing with non-critically ill patients, the CRNAs do fine. For the last 10 years anesthesia spots have been filled by the bottom of the pool US grads and foreign grads. Even as a med student at hopkins I was apalled by their lack of intelligence. In that regard I have seen some CRNAs better quallified than many of these graduates. But again, go to a top university program and you will see the difference.
On another point, and I talked about this with my brother, these salarises will probably start to drop in a few years. More US grads are going into the field, and more spots are being offerred through the match. There are plenty of MDs who would work for 180k a year, so why would you chose a CRNA??? This has happenned. My brother did his prelim year at Good Sam hospital in Portland, OR. The CRNAs started moving in 15 years ago, so the MDs lowered their fees and the hospital dropped all but one of the CRNAs. The only CRNA there now runs the books for the anes docs. As an outsider, it seems to me that there should be a balance and bond between CRNAs and MDs. Despite the patient care thing, MDs should realize CRNAs allow the existence of 4 rooms, splitting fees and double billing. Something we can't do in surgery( although with a good PA you can start pulling vein in one cards case while still in another). TO the CRNAs, just think, a few years ago you were dropping foleys, scooping poo, and checking vitals. Now you double to triple your salary and no longer have to deal with the sometimes crappy floor work. Believe me, I see anes as a bit of a joke job, tons of cash for little knowledge, and an easy lifestyle. You don't erally want to know my opinion on CRNAs. Lots of graduates will enter the field over the next 10 years, alleviating the shortage. Many of these will work the job of an attending for a lot less money, and if the numbers were high enough push CRNAs out and go for AAs.
So if i pissed any of you off to bad, I'm not taking any sides, but I personally see a difference in the care more than a few times per week. That is maybe 1 out of 30-40 cases. If an anes doc is making of 300k year easy, then sure a CRNA is worth 150k. To the primary care docs out there, if you wanted to become wealthy you should have chose a different career. Well i understand you ned to live comfortably, you should do your job because you like it...
 
Ill be the first to call it....Bull $h!T...you are a disgruntled prelim surg intern arent you.
 
Members don't see this ad :)
Painman,
Disgruntled, heck no. I love my job. The residency is a bit tough, but not too bad once you are past intern year. Intern??? I'm heading into my chief year and then a laparoscopic fellowship. Did I sound disgruntled??? Just trying to say that I personally see a difference in perioperative management in some of the sicker patients I have taken care of. I think it has to do with the residents here spending some time in the ICU.
As well, this post simply seems to argue about money. Who makes more than who....yuo can make a lot of money in any field if that is your goal, even though averages differ. One of my neighbors is a family practice doc in CT that opened up an integrative medicine clinic. He employs a few MDs, chiropractors, a chronic pain doc ( anes), an acupuncture doc and a bunch of other techs. Needless to say he rolls over 7 figures/year.
My brother will tell you, anes is a great job if you like it. I just like surgery better.
No disgruntlement here, but you're right, i think when i was as an intern i was pretty miserable, but you pretty much forget the bad stuff. my friends in medicine pretty much hated internship as well...
 
Painman,
jesus, not only did you think I was an intern, but a prelim???? what the #^$%@
 
I think it's quite silly to argue over salaries. The market will bear what the market will bear. No matter how much you personally whine or complain or bicker over it, you're not going to change the market. Yes, you can make a boat load as a CRNA and a MD-A. Who cares? You make what the market can bear. You know when push comes to shove who will always rule the anesthesia market. The MDAs will be the top dog in the anesthesia market unless the market preceives there is no need for an MD-A or that any other class of worker can be a pure substitute for an MDA. That will be fought tooth and nail by the MDAs. Further more, I believe the public will have a hard time preferring a CRNA even at half the price and never for the same price (unless there are no MDAs available in that geographic market of course).

And to ICUDOC, yes there is alot of money to be made outside of medicine and no one has any doubts about that. However, lets get real for a second, for every joe who got rich off EMC options, there are thousands burned by failed startups and broken promises. On average, the reward/risk ratio is highest for physicians across many salary surveys. For every 20 investment banker wanna bes, only 1 actually makes it. The rest burn out or have to find another line of work. My friend, who is probably brighter than me, is a software engineer who has worked for 3 startups, non of them has ever gone public, and 2 of them went bankrupt. He's making about 85K/yr. Not bad, but my MDA friends are doing much better. Let's not kid ourselves. There is no recession and loss of jobs for MDs in the healthcare world, like there are in the "real" world. My friend is a trader with an investment bank and he's making about 2/3 what your brother makes with 4 weeks vacation and guess what this year there won't be bonuses and some traders may get laid off. People are scared $^&*less at his firm. How will you explain that to your husband or wife. Sorry honey, gotta wait this terrible market out; let's dip into our savings until I can get another job. Let's get real.
 
•••quote:•••Originally posted by Ryo-Ohki:
•PDA for rotations...........$250

Medical school..............$150,000

Knowing that you will provide your patient with top notch care no matter the situation and that you deserve every penny you're paid........................Priceless•••••Now Ryo is down to paraphrasing commercials in his debate. Of course, nothing in what s/he said in any way proves that CRNA's provide anything other than top notch care. Clearly, another lost childhood, where way too much time was spent relating to Mario and his friends, with little or no time relating to real people.

Kevin McHugh, CRNA
 
Hey, all:

I have been following this debate closely since its onset but have not contributed for lack of knowledge.

However, I must say that ICUDOC's post was perhaps the very best I've ever seen on any forum on SDN to date. It was informative, honest, incisive, and spared no one. Yet it was not mean-spirited in the least.

I have never seen a single post so concisely and intelligently sum up an otherwise harangue-laden, runaway 256-message thread. That is no small feat.

Bravo, ICUDOC, whoever you are! :clap:

The David Green Team

p.s. no, this is not a paid advertisement from the friends of ICUDOC for Prez campaign.
 
ICU Doc, over all you made very good points and I am satisfied w/ you no BS post. But, you are MISINFORMED a few points. First of all, new anesthesiologists train for a total of 4 years, not the 2 total anesthesia years you seem to allude to. We have 1 clinical medicine/surgery/or transitional year. This is followed by 3 rigorous anesthesia years. This is only ONE year less than a 5 year general surgery internship. Granted some anesthesia program suck, but not the university based academic programs. Likewise, academic surgery program is no comparison to community programs.

Also, your point about anesthesiologist being overpaid is not correct. Just like there are good internist and bad internist, there are good and bad MDAs. Radiologists don't work a lot either and they are paid at lot. Compared to surgery, most other subspecialties seem to make a lot for their number of hours.

About MDA's training in your ICU, thus making there better physicians in your eyes... Don't forget that many of the ICUs in America were started out originally by anesthesiologists. Pulmonologists got into the ICU act later, only after anesthesiologists abandoned the ICU b/c of lower reimbursement. So, if the general MDAs is not well versed in SICU medicine, or not as good as the ICU surgeons, its b/c they have not trained as long as surgery residents in the ICU.

About the dregs of medical school classes going into anesthesia a few years ago...we all know that the tide has turned. Anesthesiologists all over the country, whether private or academic, is elated that well qualified medical students, some in the tops of their classes from the best medical schools, are going into anesthesia in droves. DON'T FORGET THAT ANESTHESIOLOGY, IN THE 80S AND EARLY 90S, WAS ONE OF THE HARDEST AND MOST COMPETITIVE SPECIALITIES...often reqiring high board scores and AOA status.
 
David Green Team?

Wasn't david green the nazi guy who caused a bit of stir a few months ago?
 
Gasdoc,
hey there. Just to respond. I never hinted anesthesia residency is only 2 years. As the chief of hte ICU a few months back, the second year anesthesia residents here rotate through the ICU.
2.) Overpaid. No I do not think so. It is what the demand is. My brother?? now he is one overpaid %#@$, but you would have to know him to know that. Yes, he did go to Harvard, but only because my Dad, grandfather, and great grandfather did, and he was an all star football player. If you are in anesthesia, you should keep an eye on his little hospital. St Raphael's in New Haven. He made partner 2 years ago, and filed at 625,000 last year. That is no lie. Is he overpaid, yes, are general anes docs, no. It's just that he is my brother and a fool.
ICUs run by anesthesia, yes. Sladden is the anes doc who is head of all ICU's here. I have done research with him. He is a great guy, and one bad ass MOFO. He will battle any trauma surg on fluid balance/ cardiac function.

In terms of the quality of anes docs now, yes it is getting better, and that is good. But i stillhave to state, even here, when istarted, some of these folks were unbelievable. Should never been allowed to practice.

My points was that I think there is a huge difference in most fo the care between a CRNA and good MDA. Sorry MCHUGH, you may be a good CRNA, but on the whole I see a big difference. I think CRNAs get paid a lot for what they do, but who cares???? Most are very good, but MCHUGH, you must remember that running an anesthetic case is only one thing an anesthetic doc does. These guys at Columbia are very good, and if you are in the area i would invite you to come see them run the ICUs. It gives them an understanding of what they do in the OR, which most, I think find boring. If you ar at a community program, you may not see this side of anesthesia. What kinda place are you at??? As well, if you want to compare a recent med school grad with a CRNA grad, of course the CRNA grad is more comfortable in the OR than the med school grad. But, look at an MDA residency grad and compare the two. You can not compare the apples to oranges.

Gasdoc, you misread my post, sorry dude.
 
ICUDoc, your points are well taken and I agree w/ them. As for you brother, that's what cardiac anesthesiologists go for...no matter what kind of fool you think he is :) Many of my friends think I am a fool too. But, I bet your BROTHER IS NOT A FOOL WHEN IT COMES TO PROTECTING HIS TURF AND PAYING HIS DUES TO THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ANESTHESIOLOGY (i.e. our last line of defense).

Yes, I also know a little about Dr. Sladden...he was one of my interviews at Columbia last year. By the way...you probably know this...Columbia is consider a pretty hard (and becoming very good again) anesthesia program. They were one of of the best before the mass exodus by AMGs a few years ago and had to accept a lot of FMGs to fill their spots, and evidently, you are seeing the remains of the damage. But, I can assure you that I doubt Columbia's new anesthesia residents are FMGs or incompetent AMGs. They are probably solid medical students from solid medical schools. I don't mean to bash FMGs, but overall, as a group, they are not as good as AMGs. But, I also say that some of the smartest doctors I have known are FMGs. So, Columbia, like other top notch anesthesia programs, will see vast improvements in the quality of their residents, and subsequently anesthesia care, in the next few years.

I hear that some surgery residents liked working w/ (i.e. crappying on and telling FMGs what to do) FMG anesthesia residents b/c of the language barrier and an overall more meek personality by many of them b/c of their status. Have you run into any of that? I just hear about this through the rumor mill. These same surg residents don't like AMGs as much b/c they are more independent and noncompliant (...simply b/c these AMGs are doing what they think is best for the pt) to the demands of the surgery teams. Just out of curiosity...no malaise intended.

I won't bring up any more dirt on the CRNA issue b/c there is virtually no way for an anesthesiologist or anesthesiology resident like myself to win on it.
 
•••quote:•••Originally posted by gasdoc:
•I won't bring up any more dirt on the CRNA issue b/c there is virtually no way for an anesthesiologist or anesthesiology resident like myself to win on it.•••••And herein lies the fundamental problem. As the ASA sees it, giving any ground, compromise on any point constitutes a total loss. This is true in spite of the readily apparent facts. CRNA's are practicing independently, and doing so safely. Patients cared for by CRNA's receive no less quality of care. Bottom line? It's not a win/lose situation, until some greedy members of the ASA become involved. The reality is that there are, and will be for the foreseeable future, some places that anesthesiologists won't go. These places are covered by independent CRNA's.

For proof, look no further than the "distant supervision" proposal. The basic idea was to bring CRNA's in rural areas under the "distant supervision" of an anesthesiologist in another area. Supposedly, this anesthesiologist would be available for phone consultation in the event of a problem with a patient. Come on! We all know that when things are going bad in the OR, the last thing anyone has time to do is make a phone call. This was an obvious attempt by some anesthesiologists to increase billing revenue with no real concomittant increase in workload. As an added benefit, the anesthsiologists' lobby would see an increased level of self importance, by making all CRNA's everywhere subservient to them. Unfortunately for the ASA, the AANA saw through this ploy, and so did most legislators. States are opting out of the medicare supervision rule at a pretty rapid rate. The more rural the state, the more quickly they opt out.

To use the immortal Rodney King's words, "Can't we all just get along?" Given the facts, its readily apparent that the ASA wants to increase MDA incomes, which is fine. A very understandable goal, we all want more money. But the ASA wants to do it, even if doing so means undercutting CRNA's. They thought as nurses, we would simply roll over and take whatever they wanted to dish out. But the AANA lobby was a little stronger than they expected.

Make no mistake. The position of the AANA is NOT that anesthesiologists are not needed. In fact, the AANA is of the position that should the AANA and the ASA become a team and work together, everyone will benefit, particularly the patient. Some of you have predicted that increased numbers of MDA's will, in the near future, push CRNA's out of the market, or at least drive down CRNA salaries. That's not going to happen. In fact, both CRNA and MDA numbers are falling, and probably will continue to do so for the immediate future. Why? Because CRNA's and MDA's are retiring at a higher rate than CRNA schools and MDA residency programs can put them out. THAT'S the immediate crisis we all face.

We will all be working longer and longer hours in the near future as more surgeries are scheduled, with fewer anesthesia providers to cover those cases. I'm seeing that happen already. Personally, I think the problem will be worse for MDA's. I see more an more anesthesia groups that are having to include in their contract to CRNA's a guarantee that the CRNA will be required to work no more than 40 hours a week, with the salaries you all find so distasteful. No such guarantees are made to MDA's. It's not uncommon around here to see MDA's working 60-80 hours a week. Anesthesiologists are not going to go away because CRNA's push them out of the market. But they might go away due to burnout. We (MDA's and CRNA's) must work together to fix this problem, rather than fight these silly squabbles among ourselves. That's been my real point all along.

Kevin McHugh, CRNA
 
Here here Kevin,
Finally a I see a post on this topic that is mature, well natured, and I think addresses the points. MDAs and CRNAs should be forming team approaches to anesthetic care, rather that the me verse you.. I agree, as us surgeons have to perform more and more cases, there will be a shortage in the near future, and I do see a number of MDAs logging in some serious hours.
 
•••quote:•••Originally posted by ICUDOC:
•Here here Kevin,
Finally a I see a post on this topic that is mature, well natured, and I think addresses the points. MDAs and CRNAs should be forming team approaches to anesthetic care, rather that the me verse you.. I agree, as us surgeons have to perform more and more cases, there will be a shortage in the near future, and I do see a number of MDAs logging in some serious hours.•••••(Hear,hear!) ICUDOC,

Sorry to have to say this, but you DO sound condescending. Maybe you could use one of the instant Gremlins like <img border="0" alt="[Wowie]" title="" src="graemlins/wowie.gif" /> if words fail to express how you really feel. Maybe you're just really condescending, who knows?? (No malice intended :D )

Anyway, towards my main point, let's give credit where credit is due (to Kevin McHugh) for telling it like it should be :clap: I agree that that was the real point from the beginning.

Having read all the posts on this thread, let's try to move back to what started this thread in the first place! "CRNA's making too much money 120k -180k" posted by some disgruntled?? (student doctors??).

I don't think it was ever "me versus you", it was more like you being wrong about us in the first place.

ICUDOC, thanks for nod.

RYO-OHKI:

If you need some help with your response (to McHugh's post) ...your up and coming next 20 years in med school will ensure you will have the record longest amount of training in the history of medicine.

Cheers to all the excellent "REAL" docs out there.

'course I'm a nurse.
 
Now,now,now, no need to have a cow, my fellow medical friends. I am a pre-med student, and I currently work in a local hospital's surgery depot. Yes, we use many crna's, we have to because the MDA group in my town, say they are to busy to give sufficent coverage, but actually it is more politics than anything. THere is plenty of room for both crna's and MDA'S. I have complete confidence in mda's as well in crna's. In our hospital there are certain cases a crna can't touch./ As long as they put patient safety first and know their limits, I don't see a problem.
 
stupid question, whata is crna? :)
 
•••quote:•••Originally posted by Olly5:
•stupid question, whata is crna? :) •••••Not stupid if you don't know. CRNA - Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetist. A registered nurse who has obtained a master's degree and provides anesthesia care for patients. Trained in the full range of the anesthetic practice.

Kevin McHugh, CRNA
 
For those of you who think nurses are so stupid...I assume you stay at the hospital and carry out all of the orders you write, since the nurses would be too dumb to understand...
 
Hey!

What happened to this thread? Dying out already? Man, and it was so entertaining... like watching the Osbournes...
 
Top