Hey just wanted to get everyone's input on the future of confocal microscopy and other forms of in-vivo microscopy. What are some realistic expectations as to how this technology will be embraced by clinicians and affect anatomic pathologists? From what I hear, it should ideally reduce, but not eliminate, the need for biopsies by allowing more targeted biopsies.
An obvious strength of the technology would be to allow a more rapid diagnosis. However, barriers to implementation appear to be no formal training in this activity by the vast majority of practicing GIs, high cost of implementation, no formal reimbursement, potentially more timely procedures, and more liability for the clinicians.
Yes, some of the big academic centers are working with this, but when do you see this being practiced out in the community, and if so, how do you feel that it would affect your local pathologist in terms of the volume you send him/her. Thanks for your input
An obvious strength of the technology would be to allow a more rapid diagnosis. However, barriers to implementation appear to be no formal training in this activity by the vast majority of practicing GIs, high cost of implementation, no formal reimbursement, potentially more timely procedures, and more liability for the clinicians.
Yes, some of the big academic centers are working with this, but when do you see this being practiced out in the community, and if so, how do you feel that it would affect your local pathologist in terms of the volume you send him/her. Thanks for your input