- Joined
- Oct 4, 2007
- Messages
- 84
- Reaction score
- 0
I'll try to keep this short and as non-rambling-like as possible. (And I'm sorry, my tenses will be all over the place. )
So we had a relative of a client that was in the other day, and one of the vets asked her if she wanted the nails trimmed on the dog she had brought in. Typically she has them done whenever she comes in, but the nails had been cut about a month ago, and she said no. None of us are really sure why, but the doctor preceded to cut them anyway. So, the tech decided that it wouldn't be fair to charge for it. Later that day, about 20 min before we closed, the client calls asking to bring the dog in again to see the doctor because the area around the dewclaw is swollen and seems painful. She explained that the dog had been fine that morning, and this is something that she had seen a vet for previously. (Apparently not at our clinic -- she sees 2 other vets in the area.) We offered her an appointment for the next day, explaining, after she asks, that there will be a recheck exam fee. She questions why, stating she would understand if this had arisen on its own, and in a roundabout way, insinuating the situation is our fault. After my attempts at answering her questions fail, she speaks to the owner/chief veterinarian. They come to an agreement that if it is something caused by the nail trim there will be no charge, but if it is unrelated there will be a fee. Fast forward to the appointment... Neither the original doctor nor the owner are in the office, so a different doctor, understanding the situation, does the appointment. It turns out the dewclaws were removed some time ago. Periodically the area gets infected and swells; she has seen a [different] vet about it twice in the past. When the doctor mentions that there will be a recheck fee, the client assures her that she and the other doctor had spoken and agreed that she would be seen at no charge. Not wanting to call her an outright liar, the vet sends the client on her way without the fee.
Was this the appropriate response? The actions of the original vet aside (since none of us are exactly certain what went on in the room), what would you do in this situation?
Personally, I don't know what I would do in the situation. I know that it could be a misunderstanding, and my feelings on the matter may not be in the right, but I feel terribly irked by this woman.
So we had a relative of a client that was in the other day, and one of the vets asked her if she wanted the nails trimmed on the dog she had brought in. Typically she has them done whenever she comes in, but the nails had been cut about a month ago, and she said no. None of us are really sure why, but the doctor preceded to cut them anyway. So, the tech decided that it wouldn't be fair to charge for it. Later that day, about 20 min before we closed, the client calls asking to bring the dog in again to see the doctor because the area around the dewclaw is swollen and seems painful. She explained that the dog had been fine that morning, and this is something that she had seen a vet for previously. (Apparently not at our clinic -- she sees 2 other vets in the area.) We offered her an appointment for the next day, explaining, after she asks, that there will be a recheck exam fee. She questions why, stating she would understand if this had arisen on its own, and in a roundabout way, insinuating the situation is our fault. After my attempts at answering her questions fail, she speaks to the owner/chief veterinarian. They come to an agreement that if it is something caused by the nail trim there will be no charge, but if it is unrelated there will be a fee. Fast forward to the appointment... Neither the original doctor nor the owner are in the office, so a different doctor, understanding the situation, does the appointment. It turns out the dewclaws were removed some time ago. Periodically the area gets infected and swells; she has seen a [different] vet about it twice in the past. When the doctor mentions that there will be a recheck fee, the client assures her that she and the other doctor had spoken and agreed that she would be seen at no charge. Not wanting to call her an outright liar, the vet sends the client on her way without the fee.
Was this the appropriate response? The actions of the original vet aside (since none of us are exactly certain what went on in the room), what would you do in this situation?
Personally, I don't know what I would do in the situation. I know that it could be a misunderstanding, and my feelings on the matter may not be in the right, but I feel terribly irked by this woman.