I don't believe this has been posted before. A Washington Post article on Avera E-Care. "The most remote emergency room"
Think teleradiology morphing to tele-icu morphing to tele-emergency medicine.
I am reluctant to make prophecies about the future of emergency medicine, since I have seen enough to know that 99% of those turn out to be false, but I would be very surprised if this did not become a significant part of the landscape. At least for critical access locations. Why pay to have a NP/PA on-site 24/7 when you can get a BC EM physician when you want and essentially don't pay for downtime? (Yes, there is a fixed fee but the number's quoted work out to minimal coverage.)
As a disclaimer, I have no affiliation with these companies in any way whatsoever. Except for the fact that I proposed something similar to this about 2 am on a boring night about 25 years ago...
(The article may be subscription, but there are a number of free views a month, I believe.)
Think teleradiology morphing to tele-icu morphing to tele-emergency medicine.
I am reluctant to make prophecies about the future of emergency medicine, since I have seen enough to know that 99% of those turn out to be false, but I would be very surprised if this did not become a significant part of the landscape. At least for critical access locations. Why pay to have a NP/PA on-site 24/7 when you can get a BC EM physician when you want and essentially don't pay for downtime? (Yes, there is a fixed fee but the number's quoted work out to minimal coverage.)
As a disclaimer, I have no affiliation with these companies in any way whatsoever. Except for the fact that I proposed something similar to this about 2 am on a boring night about 25 years ago...
(The article may be subscription, but there are a number of free views a month, I believe.)