- Joined
- Oct 11, 2005
- Messages
- 1,654
- Reaction score
- 5
So I was exploring some the arguments that Dr Stephen Barrett MD makes against acupuncture. And while I think that there are a lot of things on Quackwatch that correctly point out downright frauds that should be avoided, I was sort of thinking about Dr Barrett's stance on acupuncture and wondering what you guys on SDN think.
In case you don't know what Quackwatch is, it is a website dedicated to exposing medical frauds and people who exploit the general public. I think a lot of the information is good.
The main website: http://www.quackwatch.org/
And the satellite website on acupuncture: http://www.acuwatch.org/
So I visited "Acupuncture Watch" and I was surprised by the papers he has listed on there. For the most part they argue that acupuncture is relatively useless.
Now I'm taken back by this, because I'm one of those people who think, "well if they've been doing it in China for 5,000 years then there's got to be something good about it"
So does anyone on SDN here practice acupuncture? And can you tell us what you think after reading the links?
Honestly my opinion is very bias because my dad does acupuncture for free -and every now and then we get a phone call to our house asking for free acupuncture. Further more, I have a grandfather who tells me he use to have violent sweats and breakouts due to malaria - but after visiting a Buddhist monk and receiving acupuncture from the monk, says to me that he hasn't had any trouble for years. (Allright that was a little bit to far for me, however my grandfather isn't all mentally there)
I did appreciate one of the papers on Quackwatch that pointed out that the National Institute of Health (NIH) did a poor job at examining acupuncture. The NIH panel wasn't extensive enough.
Stephen Barrett also points out that there are not any good studies showing that acupuncture works. And he also points out that there have been studies that show that acupuncture does nothing but harm the patient.
Now granted Barrett does promotes allopathic medicine over anything else in general - and I think in a very few cases he goes to far, but for the most part I think he's right on the ball. But on acupuncture...now I'm having some mixed feelings about his writings.
So what do you think? Is acupuncture just a fashion statement in America? Have I been brainwashed by the alternative medicine camp as Barrett argues?
In case you don't know what Quackwatch is, it is a website dedicated to exposing medical frauds and people who exploit the general public. I think a lot of the information is good.
The main website: http://www.quackwatch.org/
And the satellite website on acupuncture: http://www.acuwatch.org/
So I visited "Acupuncture Watch" and I was surprised by the papers he has listed on there. For the most part they argue that acupuncture is relatively useless.
Now I'm taken back by this, because I'm one of those people who think, "well if they've been doing it in China for 5,000 years then there's got to be something good about it"
So does anyone on SDN here practice acupuncture? And can you tell us what you think after reading the links?
Honestly my opinion is very bias because my dad does acupuncture for free -and every now and then we get a phone call to our house asking for free acupuncture. Further more, I have a grandfather who tells me he use to have violent sweats and breakouts due to malaria - but after visiting a Buddhist monk and receiving acupuncture from the monk, says to me that he hasn't had any trouble for years. (Allright that was a little bit to far for me, however my grandfather isn't all mentally there)
I did appreciate one of the papers on Quackwatch that pointed out that the National Institute of Health (NIH) did a poor job at examining acupuncture. The NIH panel wasn't extensive enough.
Stephen Barrett also points out that there are not any good studies showing that acupuncture works. And he also points out that there have been studies that show that acupuncture does nothing but harm the patient.
Now granted Barrett does promotes allopathic medicine over anything else in general - and I think in a very few cases he goes to far, but for the most part I think he's right on the ball. But on acupuncture...now I'm having some mixed feelings about his writings.
So what do you think? Is acupuncture just a fashion statement in America? Have I been brainwashed by the alternative medicine camp as Barrett argues?