Most pathology residents I have talked to are really interrested in teaching. Is this a common trend?
tennik said:Most pathology residents I have talked to are really interrested in teaching. Is this a common trend?
i personally don't feel that teaching is the primary motive for a person to go into pathology. many fields in medicine afford themselves to teaching. medicine is all about mental masturbation...and teaching.tennik said:My question is really: do people go into pathology to teach. Also, is a major motivation to go into pathology to ensure a life of learning.
tennik said:Gotta love those dead people. Just wondering, are you going into Path?
When a pathologist talks about research are they typically referring to population studies, or basic sciece?
I would say that the American Journal of Pathology has a good mix of clinical and translational research articles. Cancer Research is a bit more translational but that's just my take on things. My background has more emphasis on basic science research so that's my bias.flindophile said:Can you give a couple of examples of what you consider clinical and translational research in pathology? Can you recommend a journal or two that focus on these areas?
tennik said:Most pathology residents I have talked to are really interrested in teaching. Is this a common trend?
In other words... clinico-pathologic studies?AndyMilonakis said:Translational research attempts to bridge the two.
xanthines said:Hey hey! Careful how you use that word around here, fella!
From the Oxford English Dictionary:
academic (Murray: ækade.mik)(IPA: æk'dmIk), a. and sb. [ad. med.L. academic-us, Fr. académique.]