- Joined
- May 13, 2014
- Messages
- 8
- Reaction score
- 2
Hard to rank my list after my #1. What are ya'll prioritizing?
Sick patients, opportunities for procedures, fit for myself and my family...similar to a lot of what other people have said in their listsHard to rank my list after my #1. What are ya'll prioritizing?
Hard to rank my list after my #1. What are ya'll prioritizing?
Most of what most people think is important is not, you will find that out no matter where you match.
Really liked this program for a lot of different reasons. Right in the heart of SF, barring COL (admittedly a very big thing to overlook), has to be amongst the best locations for anyone looking to live in an urban environment. Residents split their training at three different hospitals, Parnassus – which is primarily a tertiary, community based population; SF General – which was originally the city’s county hospital; and Mission Bay – which is a dedicated children’s hospital. The new General hospital was built in 2016 and it is absolutely amazing. Out of all the EDs I saw, this one was probably the nicest one I saw, definitely in the top 2 or 3. Patients have individual rooms the size of ICU suites and the entire layout feels very open and sleek. It’s named after Zuckerberg, who funded the new building, which is a little weird but I suppose he’s not necessarily the worst person it could have been named after. It does fit the SF tech image as well.
As the only trauma center in the entire city, SF General sees a deceptively high amount of trauma and is the safety net for the innumerable indigent population who often have severe pathology. The academic aspect of UCSF can’t be overstated but it also offers a much more solid county experience than would be expected. Combined with cadaver sims, most interns had finished most of their procedures by the first year. Due to these sites, UCSF can be considered a solid blend of county, community, and academic. Residents seemed very happy and are close even outside the hospital, are on first-name basis with attendings, and I felt that I had a good connection with them. The residents stated that teaching on shifts was very good and all the attendings were enthusiastic about resident education. The program also has mini-fellowship tracts called Areas of Distinction which provided small groups and faculty mentoring which is great if you are interested in side academic pursuits. As someone interested in academics and fellowships, this is a perfect arrangement of opportunity and mentors to further that pathway.
Cons: Two big negatives, COL and newness of the program. Housing prices in SF are absurd, though the program offers 12k/year in location stipend which is really generous, offsetting what is amongst the lower salaries of the all the places I interviewed at. Almost certainly you are going to be living with roommates in a cramped apartment. Also, the residency is only 10 years old so it’s still in the process of carving out its role in a powerhouse hospital system. Whereas in other hospitals EM is by far the dominant residency, that is very much not the case here. Though the residents did mention that they have very good relationships with other services and don’t have conflicts with admissions/consults. They still are not 100% responsible for trauma airways as anesthesia is in charge of higher level traumas. The EMR at General is also apparently terrible, while they use EPIC at the other hospitals. This is also a 4-year program, which is unfortunate, especially since you’d probably be considering fellowships if you choose to go here.
Comments: Only other thing I would mention is that while SF is a cool city, it’s not for everyone. It’s a big plus for me, but could be a negative for a lot of other people. This also applies to NYC which is where a lot of my other programs are. They are both very populous cities which means that there are a lot of people that must like living there, but you do need to be sure that you’ll be the type of person that likes living there. SF has fairly bad public transportation given how difficult having a car is. Homelessness is also a big deal so small crime is a problem; apparently if you ever leave a bike outside it will definitely be stolen. You also literally walk over people sleeping on the streets in the area around the hospital. There are certainly a lot of positives to the city, but I’m just clarifying that just because I think that being in SF is a huge plus, I can easily see how many other people would hate it.
For me, this was the easy #1 as it is a well-regarded program in a city I would love to live in, incredibly strong faculty and research/fellowship opportunities matching my own specific interests, high emphasis on teaching, residents I got along well with, among the nicest hospitals, and in general was the place I felt like I wanted to be most. I’m still not super happy about it being 4 years, on top of the fact that I think I want to do a fellowship afterwards, but the rest of the program seems like such a great fit that another year of destitute poverty seems bearable.
Somewhat of a low key program but definitely has its strengths. A very well-known and respected program for both clinical and academics with alumni all over. Residents here were really open and easy to get along with and seemed to really like the program as well as the faculty. The PD didn’t interview us, but spent the entire interview portion of the day in the waiting room with the applicants just chilling and conversing with us. He was very personable and approachable, though I do admit it would have been nice to have the opportunity to have more serious discussion with him about the stereotypical residency topics.
Clinical training is certainly solid with residents spending time at both the university hospital and at Kaiser. The main hospital was the previous county hospital of the region (Sacramento County Hospital) and still serves a similar role in the area. Spending a good amount of shifts at Kaiser is great networking for those looking to go straight to a community job. The hospital is located in Sacramento, which is much more urban and livable than the city of Davis as the name implies. Sacramento has the feel of a large city but isn’t crowded and you can actually drive around downtown. COL is reasonable, especially if you are willing to commute and it’s a very bike-able city with (we were told) great restaurants. You’ll still hit farmland once you’re outside the city, which apparently is what allows the city to call themselves the “Farm to Fork” capital.
This year, the residency program is partnering with the Air Force to provide 5 additional residency spots per class, raising the class size from 15 to 20. It wasn’t too clear how this would change the program but faculty were fairly confident there wouldn’t be any effect for the regular residents other than having a bigger class. About 25% of the graduating classes go onto fellowships, which is a bit lower than some other academic programs, and I think more a reflection of the type of people coming here than an inability to get positions. The emphasis on community medicine and the location in a more rural-ish place probably lends itself more towards community type residents.
Cons: Felt that the trauma load was lower than some other programs and while Sacramento seemed good, after you leave the city, it’s all farmland until you hit SF. During the tour, the physician work areas seemed smaller, and the entire ED had a dull lighting which made it feel a lot more claustrophobic. Residents didn’t seem to like conferences though I don’t remember why, just have that jotted down in my notes.
Comments: Very strong program with excellent clinical and academic exposure. Felt like a very good fit as well, but just wasn’t quite as fitting as UCSF. COL is so much better here though, so my wallet and bank account may be happier about me matching here 5 years down the line if things go down that road.
Came in thinking I wouldn’t like this program as much due to the much smaller patient load and bougie location. They do a good job selling the fact that they have a much smaller residency class so each resident is responsible for much more patients than they would be at other programs with much busier EDs. Some other reviews of the program seem to agree that residents here are busy. Some interviewees who had rotated here additionally confirmed that the residents were always pretty busy, so I was willing to buy that argument. Also, despite being located in Orange County and literally down the road from Disneyland, they have a good mix of acuity and trauma. They have an elective rotation at a community hospital on Catalina Island which sounds pretty interesting as you have to balance out medical concerns with the necessity of airlifting or boating out patients you want to admit to the mainland.
Of course UCI is known for being a powerhouse of ultrasound research and they had an absurd number of them in their ED compared to everywhere else I’ve rotated. Research would definitely be a strength and emphasis here, regardless of whether you wanted to do it in ultrasound or not. They also offer faculty mentoring for people who have identified areas of interest, but there is no formal system. Conferences seem more interesting as they try to do more interactive lessons than straight lectures. The day of my interview, they were doing a jeopardy-style competition. Lastly, the hospital is gorgeous; it felt like I was pulling up to a hotel as I was driving around the outside on a nice sunny day in what would otherwise be winter. The surrounding area is likewise really nice and there are relatively cheaper places to live within a reasonable commuting distance.
Cons: It’s a smaller residency class so it’s harder to get to know your fellow classmates and it seemed like they weren’t quite as close as other programs were. Residents said that you tend to know the residents in other classes better than your own because you work with them more often. I also am not sure I believe how good their acuity and trauma is, especially if you compare it to much more urban programs. They also rotate at 5 different hospitals in the Orange County region, though some of them look like they’re about an hour drive away from the main hospital. Compared to other 8-10 hour programs, UCI does slightly more shifts (20/20/17) which could help determine a tiebreaker for some.
Not a con, but despite the fact that peds rotations were at CHOC, the residents didn’t seem to think that it was a big plus to the program. So anyone who assumes the peds experience here is going to be one of the best just because of the big name children’s hospital should do a little more research into it. It’s not a priority for me so I dropped my inquiry once I realized the residents weren’t as excited about it as I thought they would be.
Comments: This program started much lower on my initial pre-interview list but greatly crept up after coming here. I really liked the feel of the residency program and the faculty here, just feel that the clinical experience here may not be quite as good due to the patient population and high socioeconomic location. I really wanted to bump this up to #2 because I like the location much more than Sacramento, but I really felt the clinical experience at Davis was better so I couldn’t justify the swap.
Every review you read about Loma Linda mentions the strength of the peds experience and they certainly hype it up in their presentation. A part of me wonders if it’s still as far ahead of other programs as it used to be, seeing as how integrated peds shifts are now the standard at other places. But all the faculty and the residents did state that they felt very well prepared to handle kids so there’s probably still something to the claim. They have a large catchment area, though it’s relevant to note that UCR just started their residency program and is located just 10 miles away. My interviewers didn’t seem concerned by this and didn’t think that there would be any change in the LLEM experience. Residents rotate at both Loma Linda University Medical Center and Riverside County (not associated with the other Riverside residency). Residents described being very independent during their county shifts and having much more responsibility, partially due to the attendings there being much more hands off. There is a good amount of rural medical problems such as snakebites, drug use at raves, etc. It’s worth noting that I felt the most comfortable with the residents here – not that I didn’t get along with residents at other programs, but the ones here felt the most like people I’m already friends with.
Everyone knows about the Seventh Day Adventist aspect of the hospital and the caffeine/meat ban but it is a little overstated. While undergrad and medical students are expected to refrain from tobacco/alcohol/drugs, my impression is that none of this applies at the residency level. The cafeteria does not serve coffee or meat, but you are free to bring it in yourself. There is a vending machine in the ED that has energy drinks, and there’s a Keurig in the staff room. The residency programs themselves seem very detached from the religious affiliation and the only difference you would see is Bible verses on the walls. I personally don’t drink coffee and hopefully won’t be eating at the cafeteria too often so I don’t care much about this aspect.
Cons: San Bernardino is pretty out of the way. When a program cites being close to a bunch of major cities as a positive (Los Angeles, San Diego, Las Vegas), that’s usually a sign that the area itself isn’t that great. However, the area itself isn’t terrible and definitely closer to Los Angeles than other places. If coffee is a necessity, you can bring your own in a thermos, but it won’t be available in the cafeteria in a pinch. The religious affiliation, though probably not a huge deal for the residency, does still exist and some might see this as a yellow or red flag.
Comments: I’m not thrilled with the location, but I do think the program is solid and the residency class is one that I would gel well with. It is still driving distance away from some family and friends so it still feels like it’s in a reasonable area for me. The name brand here is weaker than other programs at this place on my list, but as I’d be looking to stay in the region regardless, I don’t think it’s a huge concern.
I highly regret having to rank so low because I felt it was absolutely amazing and their PD has a huge passion for resident education. There are a lot of really cool things going on with their clinical exposure as the PD is dedicated to constantly changing things around and optimizing the experience while still making space for electives and allowing residents the opportunity to pursue more advanced careers despite being at a 3 year county program. He’s a little quirky but in a fun way and he definitely cares a lot about the resident experience. The burn ICU rotation seemed incredible in terms of the severity of patient conditions and the responsibility residents have to take on there. The residents told us stories of all the crazy things that happen there and the extreme levels of acuity that can come in at any time. As a county hospital, the other services a bit weaker meaning EM runs the show here even on many of the off-service rotations. This can be a good and a bad thing as your MICU and trauma senior will actually be an EM senior resident but it does mean the classic didactic learning might not be as good. They also get 3 blocks(!!) of electives which is an insane amount for a 3-year program. As a result, though this is a 3-year county program, residents have gone on to some pretty great places in fellowship and other research opportunities. The residents here seemed to be the closest and have the most fun outside of the hospital of any program I was at. Copa Pride is absolutely a thing and very apparent in all the resident interactions. They had pictures from a bunch of group trips to whitewater rafting, annual reimbursed conference trips, and overall seemed pretty happy. They also block together an entire month of overnight shifts with all golden weekends, which allows for minimal overnights during the normal ED blocks.
As a side note, they are partnering with Creighton University and Dignity Health St Hospital, effective this year. This was sold to us as a means of acquiring a university affiliation and provide support for research. None of the hospitals have an EM program, so there won’t be any new residents added by a merger and there won’t be any changes in faculty. I don’t know what effects this will actually have on the residency education but with some time to think about it, it seems pretty minor. The biggest potential downside to me would be if the hospital had to change its name to Creighton which no one had asked about so I don’t know if that’s already been decided one way or the other.
Cons: Phoenix is hit or miss from what I could tell and based on the experiences of friends who have lived in the area. The city is much smaller than I thought it would be and the thought of summers nearing 120 degrees is terrifying. As you might expect, the patient population is hugely Spanish-speaking, and though there are in-person translators available, as a non-Spanish speaking person, while I would love the opportunity to learn, I don’t like the thought of drowning myself in it. A lot of the off-service rotations are at different hospitals, requiring commuting, though driving in Phoenix is pretty low stress. They also had plans to change the format of their conferences because they didn’t like them very much, but this change was planned for April.
Comments: This is the first program I had to bump down because of location as I strongly want to match in California. If location were not a factor, it would be a strong contender for my top 1. The fact that it’s still on the west coast and no snow made it very easy to rank here right at the border of my west coast and east coast programs.
A solid, well-known program in western Brooklyn. They are notable for the diversity of their patients as they are situated at the intersection of numerous ethnic communities (ex. Asian, Hispanic, Caribbean, African, Russian, Greek, Jewish). They also have a very strong pediatric experience as they are both a pediatric trauma center and see many sick kids. They are the only pediatric trauma center in Brooklyn, though some brief research shows that other facilities seem to frequently gain and lose accreditation so it just so happens they are the only one during this application cycle. Needless to say, the diversity of pathology and patient population here is probably amongst the best around. The ED also immediately sends patients to a bed to wait rather than sit outside in the waiting room, so they are absolutely swamped with beds inside. It’s pretty overwhelming to see patients literally double and triple stacked but I’d imagine you could get used to anything in time. Residents work a combination of 8-12 hour shifts which averages out to 45-50 hours/week. This is a nice contrast to the solely 12 hour shifts that the majority of other NYC programs work.
Another aspect they pushed heavily during the interview day was the event medicine moonlighting available. Residents cover events at Madison Square Garden and Yankee Stadium. From how they described it, the job is pretty low stress and you end up being able to watch the game or concert for most of the event. They also travel for various music festivals so if that’s something you’re into, the opportunity is abundantly available. The current PD seems to love covering music events so that’s the reason for the current emphasis on this.
Residents can get housing that is down the street from the hospital, and it is much cheaper than equivalent apartments elsewhere in Brooklyn. From pictures residents showed, they were really nice and much cheaper than market price. The residents seemed pretty low key and easy to get along with.
Cons: Compared to other similar programs in the area, it probably doesn’t see quite as much adult trauma. The reputation is not quite as well-known as a household name like Sinai or NYU. And while the diversity of patients is a plus, it also means you’ll have to use a translator phone for a huge proportion of your shifts. A resident said they once went an entire shift without an English-speaking patient.
Comments: The combination of an extremely diverse patient population, strong clinical exposure without the program trying to kill its residents, and lots of event medicine opportunities made this a big standout for me. I’m a big fan of the culture of NYC so with all my NY programs, I tried to emphasis living closer to the fun parts of the city as a tie breaker.
As I alluded to earlier, NYC is a great city but not for everyone. It’s a very polarizing place – you’ll either love it or hate it. I can certainly understand someone deciding they never want to live there while others may see it as their dream destination. So for anyone deciding on a NYC program but have never been to the city before, I’d highly recommend spending a day just wandering around, using the subway and taking a look at the grocers and restaurants. It’s really unlike any other place in the US. For people who have never lived there or worked at any NYC hospital, there are some factors which will be common to all programs in the city: high COL, small apartments, dirty and crowded neighborhoods, tougher work-life balance, NYC nurses. If you were not aware, there is a very strong nursing union in NYC which means, for lack of a more PC way to phrase it, they do less work. Residents are responsible for putting in their own IVs, draw labs, and may even have to push their patients to radiology. Each hospital is on a spectrum in terms of how bad this is, but it definitely exists in every NYC program. You could see this as a plus as you’ll graduate from residency being very confident putting in lines, but I can imagine it gets old a few years in.
The current Hofstra residency is the combination of two EM residencies (North Shore and Long Island Jewish), with this being the second year of integration. NS was a 3-year program while LIJ was a 4-year, with the current combined program being a 3-year. It seemed like there were some hiccups and logistical kinks to work out the first year but the residents felt like these problems have mostly been smoothed over. There are still some lingering signs of the merger, for example the prior PDs of each program were retained on faculty and serve in what is essentially an APD position under the ‘super’ PD, but still retain a title without the word ‘assistant’. The older residents are still somewhat divided into NS and LIJ residents, and it seems like the current PGY3 class of LIJ residents will still have to do a fourth year. Weekly conferences are also hosted at each hospital on alternating weeks, though they are only 10 minutes apart by car so it’s not a hassle to attend them. I don’t know if there would be any residual friction from the merger that would affect my residency, but the residents and faculty all seemed pretty happy and enthusiastic so I don’t think it’s much of a big deal now.
The best description of the residency program is ‘bountiful’. Putting aside the salary (btw highest in the nation at 71k PGY1), the program has a lot of money resulting in them having a separate sim building (which unfortunately we were unable to tour but apparently is really nice), fresh cadaver sims, discounted resident housing on campus, and fairly nice facilities (the EDs look a little dated but the rest of the hospital looks great). Also, due to having access to both hospitals, the off-service rotations are arranged to choose the best educational experience of the two choices, resulting in a superior training than either program had alone. Though the hospitals are located in essentially the same neighborhood, they serve very different patient populations. NS sees a much higher socioeconomic, suburban population from Long Island while LIJ sees mainly uninsured and underserved patients from the Queens/NYC regions, allowing residents to practice in both types of environments. They do still rotate for a month at Shock Trauma so I’d imagine that means the main sites don’t see much trauma, and that would be expected for Long Island.
The last interesting note about Hofstra and last residual sign of the merger of two different education system is their “3+1” track. It was a little confusing at first but as far as I understand it, they offer mini-fellowship tracks during the normal 3-year curriculum then at the end of the 3-year residency, you have the option of staying for an additional 4th year but it may or may not be an accredited fellowship. It didn’t make sense to me and it seems like you’d be better served just doing a real fellowship, so this may be an afterthought that will be better defined in the coming years as subsequent classes all choose to not take the extra year.
Cons: While close to NYC, it still isn’t quite in an urban setting and the level of trauma they see reflects that. Residents do rotate at Shock Trauma for a month but I think it’s important to have the possibility of a severe trauma coming in at any time during your normal rotations. As mentioned earlier, there seems to be some residual logistical questions from the merger, so while it isn’t the same as a completely new program, you may run into similar issues as they continue to optimize their program. The residents mentioned that rotating at two different hospitals makes it difficult to form relationships with the ancillary staff as quickly.
Comments: My rank list up to this point was very easy to create and I never had any headaches about how to rank my 1-6. #7 was where I first began to constantly switch things back and forth and debate each program. My dilemma was what order I wanted to put Hofstra and Downstate as each had very different strengths. I’ll discuss what made me put Downstate further down in its own section but Hofstra felt like a good mix of academic, patient diversity, and wellness. Though this program is on Long Island, I didn’t mind the location as it has easy access to Queens and other large population centers in western Long Island.
This was the most difficult program for me to rank as it has very prominent strengths and weaknesses so it’s difficult to really pin down how I feel about it. First with the advantages: Kings County is a very busy ED with a lot of trauma and pretty severe pathology. There is a large Caribbean population and at times patients will fly from the island to NYC and come straight to the ED with medical issues that have never been addressed by another medical professional in decades. Residents have a lot of autonomy and come out of their 4th year very well trained. While a heavy county program, many of the residents also go onto fellowships. As one of the largest residency program in the country (this year they are the largest), they have a correspondingly large alumni network. I noticed that a lot of the faculty at other NYC programs trained at Downstate. The APDs I talked to mentioned that they specifically look for applicants who have strong passions in extracurricular interests so that they can balance out their country environment with academic achievements.
The hospital is located a little south of Downtown, so it’s pretty close to the major parts of the borough. The residents seemed to like each other and regularly have class hangouts after conferences. During the dinner, they were all really fun and it was definitely a good time. As I noted before, a lot of their residents go onto fellowships and leadership positions in other programs so it seems like they do a good job training leaders here. And they certainly are well known for their level of trauma so you certainly would come out well trained and ready and handle anything. And though it is a county program in an inner-city type area, there is a stronger emphasis on academics than you would expect. They offer mini-fellowships mentored by various faculty members to help residents explore areas of interest beyond clinical skills.
Cons: A 4-year county program in NYC where they do all 12 hour shifts for the first two years is pretty rough. Once you get to your third year, you start mixing in 8 hour shifts, but you have to get through the first half of residency first. Compared to other residencies, the residents do a lot more of the scutwork which would be a drag given they have to see so many patients. They have a reputation of being one of the more hard worked residencies. Despite this, they seemed to not have a huge focus on resident wellness during the presentation, though that doesn’t necessarily mean they don’t have it at all.
Comments: All in all, a lot of good things here, but ultimately didn’t feel like a great fit. The residents felt more on the bro-y side which I would be fine with but isn’t a natural match with me. Though given how big the residency is, there probably is some group of people that you can get along with regardless of personality. I was ultimately turned off by the 4 years, heavy shift schedule, and my overall gut feeling that I wouldn’t enjoy it as much as other places. I still ranked it higher than other programs due to the strength of the clinical experience and the reputation, but being a 4 year really hurt its placement for me.
A newer residency started in the last 10 years, Staten Island and LIJ are associated with Hofstra University, but Staten Island’s relationship seems currently to only be by name. While LIJ is near the Hofstra medical school and is one their main rotation sites, Staten Island is pretty much a standalone institution but they do get the benefit of the Northshore salary. I didn’t get the sense that there was as strong of an academic/research backing though the PD seemed to indicate he hoped that the Hofstra support would eventually boost this aspect of the program. The PD was really enthusiastic and seemed to really care about developing the program and educating the residents. As for the residents, they seemed to get along well and really liked the program. The vast majority of them lived in Staten Island as commuting from the other boroughs is a hassle. If you’ve never been to Staten Island, be aware that it is COMPLETELY different from the rest of NYC. SI is very suburban and more car reliant with no subways. A lot of the residents lived nearby so they could walk or bike to the hospital. Staten Island is also heavily Republican in contrast to the rest of the deeply blue NYC. Not that politics should be a reason to choose a residency, but that’s just another aspect that highlights how different it is from every other borough.
The program itself is really solid, and I think I’ve seen it posted elsewhere on SDN as a hidden gem and I would agree with that sentiment. The faculty is very invested in the residents and as a newer program, they are very willing to change things up based on residents’ feedback. They rotate at two different hospitals (btw there are only three hospitals total on the island), one of which is the trauma center and the other a tertiary community setting. We only toured the main trauma center hospital, which has a large and clean ED, which is a big deal as EDs in NYC are generally crap holes. There’s also an absolutely gorgeous new administration section where they have their sim labs and do their conferences. Though the population and density of Staten Island is much lower than the other boroughs, there are only two trauma centers on the entire island and of those two only this one has a residency program. As a result, the residents I spoke with said that they get a reasonable trauma exposure and had done a good amount of procedures by this point in the year.
Cons: As a newer program, it doesn’t have quite the name recognition of other places. Also, living on Staten Island is much different than living in the rest of NYC. Personally I felt it was not as interesting or convenient as western Long Island. They also work 12 hour shifts with smaller class sizes, making me think you wouldn’t know your fellow residents as well. There isn’t much established academics though hopefully they’ll get there in the near future.
Comments: Though I did think this program had a lot of strengths and would provide a solid education, what turned me off was the lack of reputation and being located on Staten Island. As there isn’t a train to get to the rest of the city, it seems like you’d always be faced with the irony of actually living in NYC while still being so inconveniently separated from all the fun parts of the city.
This was a program that was artificially held up much higher on my rank list for quite a while solely because it is located in California. There were a lot of things about it that didn’t match what I was looking for, so over time it has steadily dropped. That being said, positives of the program are a large catchment area comprising most of the Central Valley, significant trauma load, resident independence, COL, and high acuity.
Bakersfield is pretty infamous in California for being in the middle of nowhere and while this is fairly accurate, this also means that there aren’t competing trauma centers. There are a good amount of rural-type injuries and pathology which come into the ED and not many competing residencies in the hospital so the ED gets to manage a lot of the patient care. The hospital is only a level 2 trauma center, but I’ve been reasonably convinced that this isn’t a big deal for the EM experience, especially if there aren’t any other options in the area. They have an affiliation with UCLA, but I wasn’t sure if this changed anything for the residents as they are too far away to be able to take advantage of any of the university’s resources. Cost of living is very cheap though it’s probably a bit more expensive than an equivalent type of location in the Midwest. Everything is a little more expensive in California, even if it’s in the middle of nowhere. It was pretty obvious talking to the residents that they didn’t love living in the area even if some of them didn’t explicitly say it out loud.
The program itself sees a lot of pathology and high acuity on account of the rural catchment area. It seems like the residents have a lot of responsibilities and there are a lot of procedures to go around. There are very few other services or consultants available, so the ED has to be responsible for much more of the patient care than they would at a more resource-heavy academic center. Though the ED only sees 50k patients a year, they also only have 24 residents, so similarly to UCI, the division of work still ends up with a high number of patients per resident. I don’t doubt that residents from this program end up very competent and having seen a good mix of acuity and pathology. They stated that residents didn’t have much problems getting into fellowships, though most graduates do choose community.
Something I observed during my interview day is that everyone in the program is strongly focused on moonlighting. Both residents and faculty put a lot of emphasis on moonlighting when at most other programs, it was only given a yes/no answer if someone asked about its availability. Even the PD moonlighted at locums and talked about it during his presentation. I don’t think there’s anything intrinsically wrong with this interest, but it came off very weird to me especially as I hadn’t seen anything like it anywhere else.
Cons: Most notably, it is a 4-year program in a very undesirable location. While I would be willing to go to a 4-year program I otherwise loved, going to a city I don’t want to be in for that long is a pretty hard no. While it is still on the west coast and in California, it’s hard to really describe how out of the way it actually is (yes a two hour drive is out of the way for me). I would be much, much happier in a larger city regardless of where it is in the US. And while there is an association with UCLA, I feel like the degree of academic support would be minimal which does not line up with my career goals. Salary is also the lowest of any other program I interviewed at (47k) which admittedly, isn’t quite as terrible given the COL, but at a certain level I feel like there’s a degree of respect shown in how much of that sweet, sweet GME funding the hospital is willing to allot to its residents.
Comments: As mentioned, the biggest draw for me was technically being located in California. Compared to Staten Island, the 3 vs 4 year was a tiebreaker that led me to lower my ranking for Kern from 9 to 10. Even though I’m sure that the clinical exposure here is great, I really just wasn’t feeling it for this place. I realize there might be a disconnect with how highly I rate Loma Linda and how low I rate Kern despite both being in less desirable parts of California, and it comes down to me liking the feel of Loma Linda’s program much better, 3 vs 4, academics, and Bakersfield being much worse to me than San Bernardino. Looking back, the most difficult part of my rank list was how far I wanted to keep dropping Kern due to my initial west coast bias.
I wasn’t sure what to expect of this program coming here as there’s not a lot of info on the place. The program is certainly noteworthy for some high-profile faculty and they push that aspect quite heavily during the presentation. It felt a little heavy-handed to me as it felt like they were hanging their hat on a very narrow aspect of their program, but it definitely is intriguing to have the opportunity to work closely with big names in the field and the residents emphasized the benefits to working alongside such faculty on their shifts. The ED itself is huge and much nicer than any of the other New York facilities I toured. The city itself is pretty far into Long Island (it took me over an hour to get there from NYC), so it’s incredibly suburban which is strongly reflected in the patient population. The program is expanding residency spots and will be fully expanded after next year, which has allowed them to shorten shift lengths, which are now a combination of 9s and 12s. Residents seemed pretty chill and happy. Per them, they don’t suffer from nursing issues and a lot of the other NYC stereotypes don’t apply. COL is also seems more manageable than NYC and you’d be able to live in a house or larger apartment compared to the shoeboxes you’d have to settle for in the city. You may still need roommates though so it’s not dirt cheap. On top of the 55k salary, they also provide 5.5k in additional stipends which I’d imagine would help a lot with housing.
This program didn’t do a typical pre-interview dinner but instead held a single weekly dinner at Dave and Busters for all the applicants that week and then used the lunch during interview day as the resident-only conversation time. It was definitely the most fun ‘pre-interview’ event though it’s hard not to be when you’ve got unlimited free arcade games for the night.
Cons: Location for two different reasons – 1. Long Island is very aptly named, as it is really LONG. It’s so far from NYC that it’s unrealistic to expect that you can casually travel there often. You could probably live in-between to cut the commute but you wouldn’t want to make your work commute too long either. The area around the hospital seemed pretty sparsely populated and not as interesting as a bigger city. Some of my fellow interviewees mentioned how much they loved the area, most of whom were from more rural regions, so your mileage may vary on this point; 2. The patient population is very suburban and I wouldn’t expect you would see much of a trauma load. They do rotate at Shock Trauma for a month, but I think it would be nice to be at a program where you could expect to see trauma on any shift. As far as I have it in my notes, they also have graduated responsibilities, which I’m not sure if I myself, consider a plus or a minus yet.
Comments: Overall, this was a program that I was much more impressed with than I was expecting. I imagine that the reason it doesn’t have as notable of a reputation is for the same reason I’m ranking it so lowly, namely where it’s located. If it was located anywhere in an area that I wanted to live and with a correspondingly less suburban patient population, I’d have to give them a much harder look in terms of how to rank them. The program itself is strong enough and has at least established a name in the EM world that I still rank it above the next places. My last great debate of my rank list was whether I wanted to switch Stony Brook with Kern. Though SB is a 3 year, location seemed out of the way enough that I was now okay going to Bakersfield for 4 years.
This is a new program, started 2 years ago so this incoming class will be the first time all three years are filled. There’s very little information available about this program, due to their website being a very low priority, so I will expand a bit more about mundane details as I’m aware this may be one of the only sources of information available about them for a while.
The program was started in 2016 as a 3-year program in eastern Brooklyn at Brookdale Hospital, which was used as a trauma rotation site for a few other NYC residencies. The founding PD (aka the infamous PD of last year's rank list thread) left in November 2017 with the interim chair Dr Borenstein stepping in as the new PD. Borenstein has a lot of prior experience starting new residencies throughout the country and this seems to be his new project. The replacement chair is a current PD at another NYC program who will be transferring over. I don’t recall exactly who it was so I don’t want to be more specific than that in order to not spread any misinformation. The original PD was the former PD at Maimonides so when he came over, a bunch of the younger attendings came over with him while the older faculty at Brookdale were cleared out in order to make room. There isn’t a list of who the residents are but my impression was that a large proportion of them were from Caribbean schools.
The curriculum is pretty standard, since the people designing it have had a lot of experience with other programs, with most of the off service occurring in house. Peds ED is done at Maimonides due to the better pathology, and once a month conference is conducted jointly at Maimonides during their peds conference. They have a 4 weeks international rotation during pgy3 but as they haven’t had a third year class yet, there weren’t many details on where they had contacts. Otherwise, residents have expressed that they see a lot of trauma (as indicated by the fact that other programs came here for trauma rotations) and as there are no midlevels, each resident is responsible for a large patient load. Particularly in the first years, residents were probably overworked, but even now with a full cohort, you will probably have to work really hard here. Shifts are 12 hours, with 18/17/16 shifts in each year. Residents stressed that they generally left on time as the last hour was usually spent finishing up notes and not taking on new patients. They are considering changing to shorter shifts in the future once they have filled all their residency spots, but no definitive plans as of yet.
The area is a bit more residential than the rest of Brooklyn however there isn’t a nearby subway stop so many residents do commute by car. There are buses and apparently the program may cover taxis from the subway but I didn’t ask about this. The ED does see a lot of penetrating trauma so that’s probably a reflection on how the surrounding area is. Salary is approximately 58k PGY1, 4wk vacation.
Comments: Overall, I was much more impressed with the program than I was expecting to be. The hospital certainly has a very impressive patient load (100k for 24 residents) with a patient population that has a large amount of trauma and other serious medical complications. The residents have a very large exposure to procedures and seemed very competent due to the high demands of the ED. They stated that they perform a good amount of chest tubes and even some thoracotomies and finish up their required quota incredibly quickly. The program faculty also seem very engaged and though the program may be new, the leadership has a lot of experience behind them. Borenstein in particular seems very resident-focused and has a pretty good vision for the program as well as the resume to back up his plans. The residents seemed to really enjoy their jobs and felt they were given a very fortunate opportunity to be given a thorough education. However, I had a hard time relating with him and I didn’t feel like I clicked very well with him. Since he’s basically the mastermind behind the entire program and has such a strong vision for what he’s trying to create, I feel like not being in sync with him is a much bigger negative than it would be with another PD at a different program.
Ultimately, I am ranking them low because I have strong priorities for location and potential for an academic career. I was not a huge fan of eastern Brooklyn as you would have to travel a decent amount (and not even by subway) to reach the rest of the boroughs. And while I do feel the trauma and patient exposure here is actually amongst the top of the programs I interviewed at, I still am biased against going to a new program with no name value and which hasn’t even graduated a class yet. I’m not interested in being part of growing a program from the ground up even if the people guiding it are well versed in the process. I’m definitely being shallow in my judgment here as I really do feel like this is going to be an underrated program with a lot of great advantages, and if I were able to overcome my internal love of name brand I might have ranked this much higher.
In retrospect I probably shouldn’t have interviewed here, mainly because I knew that I would be ranking it very low and instead I ended up taking away an interview spot from my fellow applicants. As many people are likely aware, the program has been under probation multiple times over the years, though currently it is not. The reasons for it being under probation most recently were a poor board pass rate (~66% if I remember correctly) and inadequate emphasis on academics/education. A few years ago they brought in a new PD as well as a lot of new faculty and from what they said during the presentation, they revamped the residency education to account for the probation points. I believe they said they had a 100% pass rate the previous year and have maintained over 90% since the new faculty has come in. During the interview itself, the PD seemed very focused on wellness and supporting the residents. Unfortunately, I didn’t have a chance to go to the dinner and there were not many residents at the interview day so I met essentially none of the residents my entire time there. Many people would say to consider this a red flag, and for me, this was probably the nail in the coffin for a program that I already was coming into a little skeptical.
That being said, I do believe they are on the up and up due to their new influx of faculty and reemphasis on resident education. Having a fresh and enthusiastic program is a good thing in my book and as many of the new faculty are Brooklyn Hospital alumni, I think they are very motivated to improve the residency. During the interviews, the faculty were friendly and felt easy to get along with. Most of the leadership, including the chair and PD, are women, which doesn’t matter one way or the other to me, but a few of the female interviewees expressed that this was a big selling points to them. While I think the program is now much better than the reputation it has and will be better in the coming years, I’m not interested in being a part of that upswing. As for the program itself, residents rotate at different sites for some rotations, namely trauma at Brookdale and peds at Kings County. However, because of the new residency at Brookdale (see above) they are getting kicked out of that trauma rotation and were looking to rotate at Elmhurst. Meanwhile they are also trying to hire more PEM trained attendings to allow their residents to rotate in-house, but they weren’t able to give an estimated timeline or guarantee that this would happen. Currently, because they have off-site ped rotations, they do not incorporate integrated peds shifts throughout the year. For me, especially because I interviewed at those sites, I am not a fan of having to go to other hospitals to get training as I could just match at those residencies and train there directly.
Cons: Pretty straightforward, 4-year program at does all 12 hour shifts, without much or any academic focus, and doesn’t have the best reputation with history of poor board pass rates and probation. As I wrote above, I think the last part of that sentence is less relevant for future classes, but it’s always safer to go with a proven commodity. The random hospitals you have to rotate at for various rotations also felt like a big negative to me due to both the commute and I think I’d have a chip on my shoulder rotating at more well-known residencies.
Comments: During the interview day, nothing really felt like it fit with what I was looking for, but I admit this may be due to my preconceptions walking in. I still am ranking it though because while it didn’t fit me well, I do think that the quality of the education was good enough that I would greatly prefer it over going unmatched. I think that EM has done a very good job of overseeing resident education to where you’ll graduate from pretty much any program well trained to work in an ED so it’s more a matter of all the peripheral benefits. Looking at my list, it is very heavily weighted for location and reputation. Though related, neither of those things are directly a measure of the actual education you’ll receive. If I could somehow completely remove those two factors from consideration, I’d be very curious as to how my list would change.
Your interview haul was incredible with what seems to be a fairly average app. Well done.Submitted anonymously via Google Form.
Applicant Summary:
Step 1: 210s, Step 2: 230s
EM rotation grades: High Pass/High Pass/ High Pass
Inducted into Alpha Omega Alpha: No
Medical school region: Midwest
Anything else that made you more competitive: Great SLOE's despite not so great Step 1 improved Step 2. Research. Held several leadership positions on campus.
Main Considerations in Creating this ROL: Diversity amongst the residents, faculty, pt population. County/Academic
1) Emory University School of Medicine
I loved my interview day, the residents and program leadership were down to earth. I truly felt at home and that I would fit in. Loved that most of the time is spent at Grady.
2) University of Chicago Medicine
Pros: Great residents, Loved the PD. Felt like a lot like my number 1. Only 2 because I ready for a change in location. Excited about the new trauma city and what that will provided to the Southside of Chicago.
3) Washington University St. Louis/Barnes-Jewish Hospital
Loved the faculty, the PD/APD gave a great sale of the program. 4 years seem worth it. Not graduated responsibility like some of the other 4 year programs. They are the safety net hospital for STL.
Cons: residents not as diverse as I would like.
4) University of Michigan
Great program, strong 4 years. Residents well treated, so you can focus on being a resident. Different training sites, ICU in ED.
Cons: College town, not as diverse of patient population as I wanted.
5) University of Illinois Hospital - Chicago
Pros: Love the PD and APDs. Strong clinical training from various sites throughout the city.
6) Case Western Reserve University/University Hospital Cleveland Medical Center
Pros: Love this program, PD was awesome and is working hard to continuously improve it. Cleveland was a surprise in terms of what it has to offer.
7) Ohio State University Medical Center
Pros: Great clinical training, strong research program. Columbus is a great city.
Cons: Much more academic than I wanted.
8) Louisiana State University - New Orleans
Pros: Loved the residents, the vibe of the interview day was one of the most relaxed I had attended.
Cons: Like to visit New Orleans, but did not think I could live in NO.
9) HealthPartners Institute/Regions Hospital
Pro: Everyone was super friendly, would get great clinical training. The most wellness focused residency. If I had a family and a significant other this program would be way higher on my list.
Cons: Just not in a family vibe way yet in my life.
10) John H. Stroger, Jr. Hospital of Cook County
Pro: Strong EM program, large alumni network, has the pt population, diverse residency class.
Ranked lower because I had an odd interview day and pre interview dinner.
11) Boston Medical Center
pro: Loved the mission of the program, all the resources they provide for their patients. The training is great.
Cons: just did not feel like i fit in, COL in boston is too high which I knew when I applied but was willing to overlook.
Anything else to add?
As you can see I did not have the strongest Step 1 score. However I worked hard to improve on Step 2 and I made sure to knock my away rotations out of the park. I was told because of my numbers that I should apply to 60+ programs. I ended up applying to 68 and received 29 interviews and was waitlisted at 3. It truly seems that SLOEs really helped someone in my position. I am so grateful. So remember get at good SLOE, because even with excellent Step scores a bad SLOE can do damage. Also I for sure released interviews as quickly as possibly if I knew I did not want to attend.
Applied to:
University of Alabama Birmingham, Yale, George Washington, Georgetown, Christiana Care, Jackson Memorial, UF Jacksonville, UF Gainesville, Emory,Rush, University of Chicago, University of IL Chicago, Advocate Christ, UIC-Peoria, Southern IL University, Cook County, Presence Resurrection, University of Kansas- Kansas City, University of Louisville, University of Kentucky, LSU-New Orleans, Boston Medical Center, Mass General, John Hopkins, University of Maryland, Central Michigan University, Detroit Receiving, Henry Ford, Michigan State- Spectrum, Michigan State- Sparrow, William Beaumont, University of Michigan, Hennepin, Regions Health Partners, Mayo, UMKC, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis University, Wake Forest, UNC-Chapel Hill, Hackensack, Cooper, Rutgers Newark, Jacobi/Montefiore, NYU-Metro, NYU Presbyterian, NYU, Stony Brook, SUNY-Downstate, NYU-Queens, The Ohio State, Wright State, Case- University Hospital, Case- Metro, Drexel, Allegheny, UPMC, Thomas Jefferson, Medical University of South Carolina, Vanderbilt, UT- San Antonio, UT-Houston, Baylor, John Peter Smith, Virginia Commonwealth, Medical College of Wisconsin,
Invited to interview, but declined:
UT- Houston, Baylor, Jacobi/ Montefiore , Yale, Hackensack, Cooper, UMKC, University of Kansas, William Beaumont,UAB, Christiana Care, UF Gainesville, Presence Resurrection, William Beamont, Allegheny,
Rejected by:
UPMC, Thomas Jefferson, Vanderbilt, UT-San Antonio, John Peter Smith, Virginia Commonwealth, Medical College of Wisconsin, Wright State, NYU- Queens, Case- Metro Health, Drexel, Stony Brook, NYU Presbyterian, NYU Metro, Rutgers NJ, UNC-Chapel Hill, Wake, St Louis University, Mayo, Hennipin, Sparrow and Spectrum- Michigan State, Henry Ford, Detroit Receiving, Mass Gen, University of Maryland, University of Kentucky, University of Louisville, UIC-Peoria , Advocate Christ, UF Jacksonville, Jackson Memorial, George Washington, Georgetown, Northwestern( Waitlist), Hopkins( Waitlisted), NYU (Waitlisted)
This can't be true.13) Geisinger Medical Center
Second year resident said that she had yet to do a central line or an a-line.
This can't be true.
This can't be true.
I was surprised by this as well. I just can't see how that could happen.
Submitted anonymously via Google Form.
13) Geisinger Medical Center
Didn't vibe with the facutly here well. Was asked over and over again about where I was interviewing. PD had nothing but negative things to say about everything I said in the interview. Second year resident said that she had yet to do a central line or an a-line
I interviewed there and didn't get this impression at all. The PD was one of the more friendly and conversational directors I met and the residents seemed more than capable and confident. Maybe you didn't sleep well the night before or ate too much at the pre-interview dinner....mmm chocolate Oreo cake....
Should be Lakeland, not Ocala.Minor corrections from above rank lists: Robert wood johnson is a 3 year program (it was said to be 4 above); florida hospital orlando doesn't come to ocala for trauma (although UCF North Florida does)