Pt has a script for Zolpidem 10mg PRN Qty 21/D.S. 21. The pt requested a refill on the 21st day since the last fill, yet I still got this rejection: "Plans limits exceeded. Check qty and days supply."
Called Medco, and apparently they only allow 31 pills per 24 day period. I explained the pt only got 21 as that is the qty on the script, and is for 21 days. Rep explained that we could submit and dispense for a qty of 10 to make 31, but that would start a new 24 day period (what?). Despite the fact that doc specifically stated on the script "21 days," Medco is saying it doesn't matter what the doctor intended, as each time we fill a qty of equal to or less than 31 pills of zolpidem the pt has to wait another 24 days for insurance to pay (or in this case apply to the pt's deductible).
This seems really weird to me. Zolpidem isn't even an expensive drug. What's the point in making the utilization rules so strict? So now I have a patient who's paying out of pocket retail price for 3 days of zolpidem when the pt is legitimately out of the med prescribed, took it as prescribed, while the insurance is waiving it's disapproving finger.
Am I missing something here?
Called Medco, and apparently they only allow 31 pills per 24 day period. I explained the pt only got 21 as that is the qty on the script, and is for 21 days. Rep explained that we could submit and dispense for a qty of 10 to make 31, but that would start a new 24 day period (what?). Despite the fact that doc specifically stated on the script "21 days," Medco is saying it doesn't matter what the doctor intended, as each time we fill a qty of equal to or less than 31 pills of zolpidem the pt has to wait another 24 days for insurance to pay (or in this case apply to the pt's deductible).
This seems really weird to me. Zolpidem isn't even an expensive drug. What's the point in making the utilization rules so strict? So now I have a patient who's paying out of pocket retail price for 3 days of zolpidem when the pt is legitimately out of the med prescribed, took it as prescribed, while the insurance is waiving it's disapproving finger.
Am I missing something here?