Ziehm 5000

[Doctodd]

i just got a lead on a model year 2002 C-arm....ziehm 5000....anyone know of any pros/cons on this machine?

thx....really need the help cuz opening day is a couple of weeks away and i need a c-arm.

T

---

Members don't see this ad.

 

[Ligament]

this is prob. of no use, but I just worked on a ziehm 7000 and was very impressed, even though it is an older unit. ziehm seems to be a solid company!?

 

[Doctodd]

yes....my mistake...it is a ziehm 7000. Im looking at getting one and would appreciate any comments.

T

 

[Ligament]

yes....my mistake...it is a ziehm 7000. Im looking at getting one and would appreciate any comments.

T

The 7000 was VERY quiet. Image quality was at least as good as an OEC 9800. Collimators where smooth and easy to adjust. C-arm itself was well balanced and seemed to stay put without needing to use locking mechanisms, however a tech operated the c arm during procedures. True lateral looked easily possible though I can't remember specifics.

Software interface was a little slower than the 9800. Menu driven. No touch screen.

Image processing was limited. This unit did not have DSA.

Overall for an older machine I really liked it. Very quiet 10/10, well balanced 8/10, nice image quality 7/10 . Would buy it as discount machine.

Owner was very happy with reliability over at least 3 years of use.

 

[spinepain]

We had an Exposcop 7000 in fellowship. It was reliable, very fast, well balanced and easy to position as Ligament has described. Very nice if you position the C-arm yourself.

Image quality was far inferior to the newer hirez machines though. I think that 7000 was ~ 500 lines analog. A side by side comparison with a GE 9900 was striking.

The same machine with 1k digital rez would be great.