Zetia increases risk for heart attacks!

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

BMBiology

temporarily banned~!
Removed
20+ Year Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2003
Messages
8,860
Reaction score
3,420
Study Reveals Doubt on Drug for Cholesterol

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/15/business/15drug.html?pagewanted=2&_r=1&hp

By ALEX BERENSON
Published: January 15, 2008

A clinical trial of a widely used cholesterol drug has raised questions both about the medicine's effectiveness and about the behavior of the pharmaceutical companies that conducted the study, cardiologists said Monday.

Merck and Schering-Plough, which make the drug, Zetia, and a pill that contains it, Vytorin, said Monday morning that Zetia had failed to benefit patients in a two-year trial that ended in April 2006.

Merck and Schering repeatedly missed their own deadlines for reporting the results, leading cardiologists around the world to wonder what the study would show. At the same time, millions of patients have continued taking Zetia and Vytorin.

The drug companies blamed the complexity of the data for the delay. Now, barely a month after news articles noted the delay and Congress pressured the companies to disclose the study's findings, the results are out.

In a press release, Merck and Schering said that not only did Zetia fail to slow the accumulation of fatty plaque in the arteries, it actually seemed to contribute to plaque formation — although by such a small amount that the finding could have been a result of chance.

Dr. Steven E. Nissen, the chairman of cardiology at the Cleveland Clinic, said the results were "shocking."

"This is as bad a result for the drug as anybody could have feared," said Dr. Nissen, a widely published researcher and senior consulting editor to the Journal of the American College of Cardiology. Millions of patients may be taking a drug that does not benefit them, raising their risk of heart attacks and exposing them to potential side effects, he said. Patients should not be given prescriptions for Zetia unless all other cholesterol drugs have failed, he said.

Both companies' shares fell Monday. Sales of the two drugs were $5 billion in 2007, and they are important contributors to Merck's and Schering's profits.

The House Energy and Commerce Committee, which is investigating the delay, said in a statement Monday that the negative results added to suspicions that the companies had deliberately sat on their findings from the study, which was known as Enhance.

"In light of today's results, which were released nearly two years after the Enhance trial ended, it is easy to conclude that Merck and Schering-Plough intentionally sought to delay the release of this data," Representative Bart Stupak, Democrat of Michigan, said in the statement. Mr. Stupak is chairman of the committee's Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations.

Dr. Harlan M. Krumholz, a cardiologist at Yale, said drug companies had a responsibility to release all their trial findings, positive or negative, as quickly as possible — even if the results might hurt sales.

"People may have been on this drug without the ability to know that there was additional data that may have thrown into question its effectiveness," Dr. Krumholz said. "That's extremely unfortunate, and that's an understatement."

Lee Davies, a spokesman for Schering, said the delay was unrelated to the negative findings and that the companies had not known the results until two weeks ago.

Dr. John Kastelein, a Dutch cardiologist who had conducted the Enhance trial for Merck and Schering, did not return calls or reply to an e-mail message seeking comment. Mr. Davies said that Dr. Kastelein would not comment until he formally presented the results at a cardiology conference in March.

In the trial, patients received either Zocor — an older cholesterol drug — or a combination of Zocor and Zetia, in the pill form known as Vytorin. About 60 percent of patients who take Zetia do so in the Vytorin form, which like Zetia is jointly marketed by Merck and Schering.

Worldwide, about one million prescriptions are written for Zetia and Vytorin each week, and about five million people are now taking the drugs worldwide.

The trial covered 720 patients and lasted two years. While it was relatively small, cardiologists have been were eager to see its results because they have far less data on Zetia than on other cholesterol-lowering medicines.

Statins like Zocor and Lipitor have been shown to lower cholesterol by 35 to 60 percent in most patients and have also been proved to reduce heart attacks. Zetia, which works by a different mechanism, reduces cholesterol 15 to 20 percent, but it has never been proved to reduce heart attacks.

The Enhance trial was meant to prove that Vytorin's combination of Zetia and Zocor would reduce the growth of fatty plaque in the arteries more than Zocor alone. Instead, the plaque actually grew almost twice as fast in patients taking the combination.

Reducing plaque growth is crucial, because plaque formation — known as atherosclerosis — can lead to the blockages and blood clots that cause heart attacks and strokes, said Dr. Howard N. Hodis, a cardiologist at the University of Southern California. That is why the trial's finding is worrisome, Dr. Hodis said.

"Clearly, progression of atherosclerosis is the only way you get events," Dr. Hodis said. "If you don't treat progression, then you get events."

The results of the trial require further investigation, Dr. Hodis said. "That just can't be ignored."

Dr. Michael Davidson, a cardiologist in Chicago who has conducted clinical trials of Zetia for Merck and Schering, said the Enhance results did not necessarily mean the drug did not work. Many of the patients in the trial may have been on statins for many years before the trial began, so adding Zetia may have had only marginal benefits compared with its use in a population not as extensively treated for cholesterol, he said.

Still, he said, patients should generally receive a statin before getting Zetia.

Beyond the Enhance trials, Merck and Schering recently began two large clinical trials intended to test whether the combination of Zetia and statin drugs actually reduces heart attacks and strokes when compared with statins alone. But the data from those trials will not be available until at least 2011.

Merck and Schering share profits from their joint marketing of Zetia and Vytorin. The drugs are important contributors to both companies' profits, but more so to Schering, which is smaller and less profitable than Merck. Analysts estimate that about 70 percent of Schering's earnings depend on Zetia and Vytorin .

Merrill Lynch on Monday reduced its rating on Schering's stock from buy to neutral, warning that some doctors might move away from Zetia. Schering's share price fell 8 percent , while Merck's dipped 1.3 percent.

Because Zetia reduces cholesterol in a different way from statins like Lipitor and Zocor, doctors often prescribe it as an additional therapy for patients whose cholesterol remains high even after they are already taking statins.

But even before Zetia was introduced in 2002, some cardiologists argued that statins have positive cardiovascular effects that go beyond their ability to reduce cholesterol, and that Zetia lacks those effects.

The Enhance trial covered patients who have a gene that causes them to produce high levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, commonly called LDL or bad cholesterol. Patients in the trial had LDL levels of about 320 milligrams per deciliter at the beginning of the trial, about three times the level cardiologists deem acceptable.

Over the two years of the trial, patients who took Zocor alone reduced their LDL by 41 percent on average, while patients who took Vytorin reduced their cholesterol by 58 percent. Yet despite the larger cholesterol reduction, patients taking Vytorin actually had more growth of fatty plaque in their carotid arteries than those on Zocor.

Members don't see this ad.
 
Haha...they always interview that meddling Nissen d-bag from Cleveland.

First person to hunt down and post a copy of the study gets a virtual cookie....
 
I predict the following:

(1) Mds would be too worried to prescribe Zetia and d/c it in their pts
(2) PBMs will take it off the formulary
(3) Zetia and Vytorin on my pharmacy selves will expire :mad:
 
Members don't see this ad :)
Avandia and Actos both got a black box warning after that study came out. I forgot to add:

(4) FDA will "investigate" and conclude that a drug that is supposed to reduce the risk for a heart attack but actually increases it should be taken off the market.
 
I can just hear the calls rolling in tomorrow from people just freaking out.....it's going to be a great day in the pharmacy!
 
This trial masterfully demonstrates the problem with allowing the pharmaceutical industry to have control of the "evidence" that is supposed to form the basis for clinical decision making. It is important to point out, that in ENHANCE, the PRIMARY INVESTIGATOR did not have access to his own data and had no clue the primary endpoint was being changed (allegedly)! I am deciding whether there is a presidential candidate who will be able to grasp the depth of this issue and use some executive power to take back science, which has essentially been hijacked by the industry. At this point only John Edwards has made a strong impression, but the media is slowly pushing him out of the race in favor of Hillary and Barack.

Merck and Schering Plough are going to spend the next several months doing damage control, stating that this trial doesn't mean anything, and that they have more relevant ones on the way. Well, why the hell did they conduct this trial then? They claim the data has been concealed for TWO YEARS AFTER THE CONCLUSION OF THE STUDY because the endpoint was difficult to assess. Well, why did they choose the endpoint that they did? I think it became "difficult" and "confusing" when they started seeing their drug didn't do what they needed it to do (i.e. reduce the carotid intima-media thickness). Now all of the sudden there are all sorts of problems, and meanwhile they felt they had no obligation to patients on this drug to let them know it may actually be hurting them....In my opinion, there is absolutely no justification to use this drug until it is shown to improve some clinically meaningful endpoint (which, by the way, ENHANCE still would not have given us, as carotid intima-media thickness should still be considered somewhat surrogate, and makes me inclined to believe the drug companies thought they had the answer to their question before they conducted the trial; now that is what I call science!!). I'd encourage anyone in my family to discontinue it if they were prescribed ezetimibe.
 
Has anyone been able to get ahold of the actual trial? Only thing I have found is the press release.
 
I don't think the study is available. I'm not too excited about it until I know more information. I'm not telling anyone to stop taking it yet - there is no difference for better or worse. The "more growth of fatty plaques" statement in the posted article is quite misleading, both groups had thickening and the difference between the groups was not significant. Pretty much everything about this study is not significant. Nothing like a media freak-out to make our lives interesting :rolleyes:

I do agree the concealment and study design is very fishy.
 
The "more growth of fatty plaques" statement in the posted article is quite misleading, both groups had thickening and the difference between the groups was not significant. Pretty much everything about this study is not significant.

The part that is significant IS the fact that nothing was significant in the study. Ezetimibe therefore is a drug with no proven clinical benefit with no long term safety profile. Don't even get me started on cost. Anyone can answer me this: why would you advocate patients remaining on ezetimibe when it cannot even satisfy a surrogate marker of efficacy? And, I do not accept the "the primary endpoint was not significant" story; if this is true, then WHY WAS IT A PRIMARY ENDPOINT IN A HIGH PROFILE STUDY? If the result was positive, do you think we'd dismiss it, maybe. But, you better know that Merck and Schering Plough would have used a positive result to justify Zetia over simvastatin as first line therapy. So, I am turning the table, they made their bed by designing this trial, and then drawing attention by CONCEALING data and delaying the reporting of results. No ezetimibe until it is deemed clinically relevant by way of rigorous, unbiassed scientific evaluation.

And there is no published manuscript, it took a congressional investigation to get the blood suckers to even give us this information.
 
The part that is significant IS the fact that nothing was significant in the study. Ezetimibe therefore is a drug with no proven clinical benefit with no long term safety profile. Don't even get me started on cost. Anyone can answer me this: why would you advocate patients remaining on ezetimibe when it cannot even satisfy a surrogate marker of efficacy? And, I do not accept the "the primary endpoint was not significant" story; if this is true, then WHY WAS IT A PRIMARY ENDPOINT IN A HIGH PROFILE STUDY? If the result was positive, do you think we'd dismiss it, maybe. But, you better know that Merck and Schering Plough would have used a positive result to justify Zetia over simvastatin as first line therapy. So, I am turning the table, they made their bed by designing this trial, and then drawing attention by CONCEALING data and delaying the reporting of results. No ezetimibe until it is deemed clinically relevant by way of rigorous, unbiassed scientific evaluation.

And there is no published manuscript, it took a congressional investigation to get the blood suckers to even give us this information.

:thumbup: Exactly...

This is interesting too:

http://www.forbes.com/2008/01/10/merck-schering-vytorin-biz-cx_mh_0111enhance.html?feed=rss_news
 
Whats funny is my preceptor is out of the office tomorrow and we are supposed to analyze the new data out about Zetia/Vytorin and give a presentation to the docs on Friday. Is the ENHANCE trial the only negative to have come out recently?

Amen to the thoughts of the person above in regards to drug companies having control over whether these trials see the light of day.
 
Members don't see this ad :)
Something interesting here for people to have a look
http://www.merck.com/newsroom/press_releases/product/2008_0114.html

I read somewhere yesterday that the population used in this study is not typical due to their very-high LDL according to NCEP guidelines.
Nevertheless, statin drugs are still considered first-line therapy anyway. This incidence appears to be just another chance for the press to inflame the fact that drug companies trick pt for the profit motives. The news on tv yesterday was pretty disturbing when one of the MD's interviewed saying the drug company had misled everyone. :scared:

What do you, practicing pharmacists, tell pts--the innocent, ill-informed, access-limited-- regarding this issue? I'd love to hear in case I get asked. ;)
 
Wow I must have been living in a hole for the past couple of days. I just went back to work after 4 days off and was bombarded with questions about this new study, and I had no idea what to say about it. Of course we have no internet access at work, so I told patients I would take a look at the study and get back to them. Now I realize the actual study isn't out there to look at, yuck.
 
Wow I must have been living in a hole for the past couple of days. I just went back to work after 4 days off and was bombarded with questions about this new study, and I had no idea what to say about it.

Umm ya... had the same bombardment. I think vytorin should get a larger study done on it. Might not be possible to do a new one now, but they might be able to pull together a multi-national meta-analysis.

Side note: Funny how the news media pulls the arm-chair quarterback routine. The drug companies spend millions in investigating new products only to get shived in the back by the media...

By the way, any LTC pharmacists out there?
 
I think it is outrageous that Merck had this study results completed in April 2006 and has only now released the results (after considerable prodding) to the public.
Crazy. That cover-up represents 6-8 *billion* dollars of wasted healthcare money in the past year.
 
study results completed in April 2006 and has only now released the results... That cover-up represents 6-8 *billion* dollars of wasted healthcare money in the past year.


Yikes i missed the 2006 part. ya, that just makes the drug companies look worse. can anyone smell centralized healthcare comming... Uhh ohhh... :scared:
 
For any of you turkeys who care/are interested (although I am guessing anyone who cares already knows this information), the ENHANCE study manuscript is now available at www.nejm.org. The results were officially released/discussed at the American College of Cardiology meeting this weekend in Chicago.

At this point you are able to view it, as well as some accompanying articles, free of charge.
 
For any of you turkeys who care/are interested, the ENHANCE study manuscript is now available at www.nejm.org. The results were officially released/discussed at the American College of Cardiology meeting this weekend in Chicago.

At this point you are able to view it, as well as some accompanying articles, free of charge.

I saw that...thought the editorial was interesting. Funny how PC everyone's trying to be to cover their a***s.

I guess Zetia's officially moved to the bottom of the list:

Until such data are available, it seems prudent to encourage patients whose LDL cholesterol levels remain elevated despite treatment with an optimal dose of a statin to redouble their efforts at dietary control and regular exercise. Niacin, fibrates, and resins should be considered when diet, exercise, and a statin have failed to achieve the target, with ezetimibe reserved for patients who cannot tolerate these agents.
 
One other thing I just noticed that is pretty cool (if you ask someone such as myself), is one of the accompanying articles to ENHANCE, which has been anxiously awaited by the medical community for months, is a "Special Article" titled "Use of Ezetimibe in the United States and Canada."

What is so cool about it you ask? Well, I haven't actually read it yet, but the lead author is a Pharm.D. Pharmacists who show up as the lead author on pre-release papers in the New England frickin Journal of Medicine just impresses me.

That is all.
 
One other thing I just noticed that is pretty cool (if you ask someone such as myself), is one of the accompanying articles to ENHANCE, which has been anxiously awaited by the medical community for months, is a "Special Article" titled "Use of Ezetimibe in the United States and Canada."

What is so cool about it you ask? Well, I haven't actually read it yet, but the lead author is a Pharm.D. Pharmacists who show up as the lead author on pre-release papers in the New England frickin Journal of Medicine just impresses me.

That is all.

very :cool:
 
Top