- Joined
- Sep 15, 2011
- Messages
- 457
- Reaction score
- 212
MDT has great reps where I am in CA, but WC doesn’t cover SCS for FBSS; CA sucks
WC stim success rate is dismal. Avoid at all.costs
MDT has great reps where I am in CA, but WC doesn’t cover SCS for FBSS; CA sucks
I'm not looking for a pills for poke model or cuts for weaning. Either way, they come off if indicated.
The system I'm in incentivizes me to try, but failure is an option and I'm happy to explant a device.
I just feel it's inappropriate to remove treatments from a treatment algorithm because it's too hard or scary for me, but I agree, I don't see as many clean wins as you might. I sleep better knowing I'm trying, but it is wearing me down.
If it's safe, testable, and approved by insurance, lets kick the tires and light the fires big daddy
my experience, limited tho it may be - out of the albeit limited number of implants I set up per year, 99% of those that get explanted are either Medicaid or WC.
s
how about auto injury patients? in the same category as WC when it comes to stim?
I am not aware of data on that topic.
In my area, stims only work in auto cases while the patient is concurrently being prescribed opiates and while the case is still open. When the case closes/settles, the stim stops working once they get placed on Medicaid and/or the opiates stop.how about auto injury patients? in the same category as WC when it comes to stim?
The push back against Medicaid is more problematic for me to understand. I get that those patients have more comorbid disease and demographically are more likely to be lower-income. Colloquially I hear talk about them 'failing at life' as compared to the private insurer population. While the deck is stacked against them, I have not seen data suggesting they're more likely to fail a therapeutic avenue if they get access to it.The effect of workers’ compensation on outcome measurement methods after upper extremity surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Patients who receive workers’ compensation (WC) often display worse surgical result such as prolonged pain or reduced functional ability. The outcomes of surgery can be assessed using a variety of surveys, assessments, and measurements. It is ...www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
It may seem strange, but whichever system has the best support setup with reps. This stim isn't worth much if the reps ignore the patient.
MRI compatibility, high freq, and burst capabilities are a plus. However, if someone has primarily a radic with mostly leg pain, you can cover that with most any system. Keep in mind that we covered those patients with ancient Quad Plus leads.
You just unlocked the key to all of neuromodulation.I've had excellent outcomes with both Medtronic and Boston Scientific WW. Medtronic's latest IPG is excellent and so is their local rep support here.
How does one company feel about you whoring for other companies?
When I see multiple disclosures, i ignore any clinical content from that person. Their bias makes me not believe a word they say.