I work in an ortho spine group with 3 spine surgeons and 4 PM&R Pain
This model could not work out better for me, some of the hasty generalizations of spine surgeons on this thread are certainly warranted (even saw this on the academic side of things during fellowship) thankfully I work with very conservative surgeons, no multilevel spine fusions for 23 year old females with slight disc dessication (puke)
All of us take "all comers" and meet somewhere in the middle, some of the surgeons will order injections and "manage" patients that aren't surgical others will refer to the physiatry and vice versa for patients's that are surgical, no one expects large take-overs or dumps of opioids, all of us see "difficult" patients, this comes with the territory we tread in
We do weekly spine conference, all are open to all therapies and approaches. Again, very conservative.
I am a newbie (less than a year), guarantee first year, very acceptable, (partner at one year), buy in for everyone is same, year one to two eat what you kill, year 2+ eat what you kill plus proceeds from ASC, this keeps buy in relatively low. Have seen books, all do very well including the doc who has been there three years and still building his practice.
It is not one sized fits all for this practice set up, you have to ask very pointed questions and also "go with your gut" If it doesn't feel right or the set-up in tenuous or you work with one of those famed surgeons who multi fuses the young and impressionable or doesn't buy in to multidisciplinary treatment of spine/pain patients you will be up ****s creek with a turd for a paddle
But it certainly works in some cases