Why don't more psychiatrists accept Medicare?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

reca

Full Member
7+ Year Member
Joined
Jan 9, 2017
Messages
256
Reaction score
424
I've been exploring the business end of things this year as I haven't had much exposure to it during residency. I feel like I'm missing something because I've been told by many attending psychiatrists that if you go into private practice, it's not feasible to accept Medicare. Also been told that it's impossible to have a therapy based practice if you take insurance.

However, when I look up the Medicare fee schedule, the lowest reimbursement for a 99213 + 90838 is relatively high. These are the codes for weekly therapy, right? $70 + $115. Doing the math, it comes out to over 250k/year for a normal practice.

Am I missing something?

Members don't see this ad.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Medicaid is a much lower payor than Medicare and definitely off the table in my state. Medicare has more strings attached than commercial plans, but it generally pays easier. It often reimbursed less than commercial plans though.

How are you calculating your $250k?

$185/hr is terrible pre-overhead. Most people wouldn’t start a pp with those numbers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Medicaid is a much lower payor than Medicare and definitely off the table in my state. Medicare has more strings attached than commercial plans, but it generally pays easier. It often reimbursed less than commercial plans though.

How are you calculating your $250k?

$185/hr is terrible pre-overhead. Most people wouldn’t start a pp with those numbers.

Hmm, I was doing 185 (dollars/hour) * 40 (hours/week) * 48 (weeks/year)= 355,200. I was figuring 20% overhead, so comes out to around 284k.
 
Members don't see this ad :)
Hmm, I was doing 185 (dollars/hour) * 40 (hours/week) * 48 (weeks/year)= 355,200. I was figuring 20% overhead, so comes out to around 284k.

20 percent overhead is quite optimistic
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Hmm, I was doing 185 (dollars/hour) * 40 (hours/week) * 48 (weeks/year)= 355,200. I was figuring 20% overhead, so comes out to around 284k.

If you are doing 40 clinic hours with insurance:
Billing company -7%
credit card processing - 2-3%

You’ve almost hit 10% overhead by the time you collect $0.01. That doesn’t include staff to fill 40 clinic hours. Even with few therapy patients, you’ll be weeding through dozens of prospective patients over the phone, verifying insurance, and collecting paperwork. Staff are also needed for PA’s patient problems, refills, etc. Then you have rent, utilities, EMR, licensing fees, malpractice, supplies, furniture, advertising costs, computers, etc.

Overhead is a lot more than people think.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users
I am employed, so I hope more PP people answer. I love getting their insights on these questions (I will probably join them in the PP world one of these days).

Doing some quick math, presuming:

$185/hr
x 6 hours per day
x 5 days per week
x 46 weeks worked per year =

$255,300 gross income

I chose 6 hours per day as what I believe to be an optimistic number of hours you could bring in. If you are billing Medicare I believe no-shows are just lost income (you can't charge for the missed time). To get higher than 6 per day, you would need to basically fill all available time slots all the time, with virtually no no-shows. Those assumptions seem unrealistic to me, so I adjusted down to the (still optimistic) 6. As TexasPhyisican mentioned above, you have to do a lot of other logistical / practice management stuff, so I think 6 clinical hours 5 days per week would feel like full time (and maybe more).

I factored in 46 weeks per year presuming four vacation weeks plus random holidays and sick / other personal leave. Keep in mind you are employing yourself, so there is no such thing as sick leave, ducking out while someone covers for you, leave for jury duty, etc. etc. I think 46 weeks worked is probably realistic.

So you would be working effectively full-time, making $255k (optimistically) with NO health insurance, retirement plan, disability insurance, malpractice insurance, life insurance, or overhead including any billing, office space, EMR, tech equipment, etc. Working for an employer all the stuff I just mentioned is typically included (or for things like disability and life insurance at least available at better rates). Presuming you could pay for all of that stuff with 20% of your gross income is way too optimistic I think, but that brings you down to almost $200k in pre-tax income. This of course does not factor in hiring any actual staff; you would be handling everything on your own (or at most contracting it out).

So at that point you are making $200k working what is really full-time in your solo practice. On the one hand, you get to do things your way; set your hours when you want, do only one-hour followups, and keep a very small panel. On the other hand, you could walk into even many part-time jobs making well over that, and have things like overnight call coverage, CME, colleague interactions etc. built in. I think the bottom line is that a Medicare psychotherapy practice might be doable, but many employed positions would be more attractive to the large majority of psychiatrists.

With that said, if you mix things up a bit and bill some 30 minute E&M + psychotherapy add-on visits (basically doing shorter visits with brief psychotherapy built in) then I would bet the numbers start to look considerably better. I suspect if you are careful you could accept Medicare, but it will likely undershoot the kind of hourly income you end up wanting to bring in and you will have to adjust to make more during your other hours, either by higher volume or better payors (cash or higher-paying insurance policies).

But for any PP people who made it through this giant wall of text, please keep weighing in! I (and the OP and others in our similar situations) would love to hear what we might be missing before we make the leap.
 
I know multiple psychiatrists that do only 1 hour appointments with therapy +/- meds. 0 take insurance.

All bill $225+/hr, accept no insurance plans so they can manage billing themselves, and use a form of online scheduling to keep admin costs down. These are significant cost savings. $185/hr from Medicare will be around $140/hr net after overhead. Most Medicare patients are not excited about no-show fees. You will have a lot of turnover, or you will be forgiving. 6 of 8 hours showing up = $105/hr.

In my pp experience, people 65+ with Medicare hate online scheduling. They call and bill with my staff.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
What I think OP is also forgetting here is the facility fee part of things for hospital systems. When you're part of a hospital system working in a clinic seeing mostly Medicare patients, the hospital is also billing a facility fee to Medicare (which you can't bill if your'e solo if I'm remembering correctly). So the hospital can afford to pay you 250K with benefits because you end up bringing in more than that overall with your professional + facility fee (which offsets things like the billing department, front office staff, etc).

Also remember that hospitals will allow a bit of loss in order to provide a service that they really need in the system and will just make up for it with higher billing procedures/specialities. So if they need geri-psych or a psychiatrist that takes medicare cause they have a bunch of patients being referred from primary care with nowhere to go, they''ll take a little bit of a loss to recruit someone for these patients.

So yes, in short it's much more feasible to work for a larger system taking Medicare than trying to carve that out on your own.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
1) You have to hire a clearinghouse to bill Medicare, which will increase overhead.

2) You’d be well served to look at the legal industry’s information about how many in office hours become billable hours. Being in the office for 40hrs does not equate to billing for 40hrs. Pre-auths, billing inquiries, patient communications, forms, phone calls, bathroom breaks, business management, staff management, and general life hassles will destroy how many hours you can actually bill for, and get paid. Even if you’re a god, and write down every instance of 99080, and get paid for that.

3) The population base is inherently prone to behaviors that will mess up your hourly average. The elderly will reschedule at the hint of inclement weather, or the hint of family activities. The cognitively impaired can complain to Medicare that you’ve never seen them, which can trigger an audit. The truly disabled will have some hospitalizations and/or transportation difficulties that interfere with care. The “disabled” will have something better to do.

4) Medicare prohibits sending someone to collections, which can mess up your take home. You can ask, you can beg, but you can’t do much else. Which wouldn’t seem so bad, until you realize that since Medicare is a governmental agency, so violations are felonies, not civil matters.

5) Medicare is notorious for stopping all payments when you move offices. They move slow in processing the paperwork. So you can sit around, paying staff, hoping that your huge check arrives in the next couple months.

6) Carefully look at the provider enrollment agreement. There are MANY requirements that you would never suspect.

Edit: 7) remember that in PP your own health insurance (but NOT your own occupation disability insurance) goes into your overhead. That complicates how you estimate that.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 12 users
Something to consider is Medicare often involves older patients, which entails similar enmeshment issues to child psych. But instead of 2 parents, you may have to deal with multiple adult children, spouse, and/or multiple adult siblings. More phone calls, more miscommunication/fights between relatives, and a rotating cast of new relatives at each visit to whom you have to explain the plan as if it were the first time.

Plus older patients have the dreaded 10 page med rec, along with numerous med changes, health changes, hospitalizations. Older patients may also have dementia, joint problems, CVAs or other issues that affect communication, ability to navigate technology (telepsych delays), and mobility. Have you seen how long it takes for an elderly morbidly obese person with COPD to arise from their chair in the waiting room and walk to your office? I've had patients where I fear they may collapse and die walking to/from my office.

Most of a 20-30 minute follow up can easily be consumed by all of the above, leaving just a few minutes to address psych issues. Most of these patients really need 60 min visits but you'd make negative dollars because Medicare/insurance financially disincentivizes anything longer than 15-30 minutes. We have a small % of Medicare patients in our program but no way will I be taking Medicare.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
$70 + $115.
Most people who do private practice clear FAR beyond $185 an hour. To put things in perspective, in a high psychiatrist density area such as Boston the pp rates I've seen are anywhere from $300-1000. And that's cash for 45 min WITHOUT the hassle of working with insurance companies.

Oh and their waiting lists are weeks to months.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Most people who do private practice clear FAR beyond $185 an hour. To put things in perspective, in a high psychiatrist density area such as Boston the pp rates I've seen are anywhere from $300-1000. And that's cash for 45 min WITHOUT the hassle of working with insurance companies.

Oh and their waiting lists are weeks to months.

But at the same time, we have colleagues in this forum opening PPs and not doing nearly so well. Where is the catch? I'm genuinely asking that because I am still curious about how is the reality of psychiatry here in America. I have a feeling I will get disappointed and find the same problems I had in Brazil, but hopefully, I am wrong. I also heard dozens of stories like that before graduating there, just to learn that those were 1-2 professionals in each city that were not the best ones, but in most cases the sketchiest ones.

Bottom point, how feasible it is to open a cash PP and charge 300-400$ an hour?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
If you are doing 40 clinic hours with insurance:
Billing company -7%
credit card processing - 2-3%

You’ve almost hit 10% overhead by the time you collect $0.01. That doesn’t include staff to fill 40 clinic hours. Even with few therapy patients, you’ll be weeding through dozens of prospective patients over the phone, verifying insurance, and collecting paperwork. Staff are also needed for PA’s patient problems, refills, etc. Then you have rent, utilities, EMR, licensing fees, malpractice, supplies, furniture, advertising costs, computers, etc.

Overhead is a lot more than people think.
And don't forget the 35% no show...
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Members don't see this ad :)
But at the same time, we have colleagues in this forum opening PPs and not doing nearly so well. Where is the catch? I'm genuinely asking that because I am still curious about how is the reality of psychiatry here in America. I have a feeling I will get disappointed and find the same problems I had in Brazil, but hopefully, I am wrong. I also heard dozens of stories like that before graduating there, just to learn that those were 1-2 professionals in each city that were not the best ones, but in most cases the sketchiest ones.

Bottom point, how feasible it is to open a cash PP and charge 300-400$ an hour?

There are at least two child psychiatrists in my metro who are cash-only and charge rates like this. They are not quite as ludicrously full as their insurance-accepting counterparts but they still have waitlists. Child is a whole 'nother thing, though.

Adult-wise $300-350 an hour seems like the standard-ish cash rate around here. I am not privy to exactly how full the various cash-only psychiatrists are around here but some have been at it for a while and seem to still be making a go of it. I will see is that folks in this area tend to expect to be able to use their insurance but that's fine because the better insurances end up reimbursing pretty close to that rate with appropriate use of add-on codes.

That major difference is how quickly you will fill. There is a reason "take a part time job and build PP on the side" is a classic, takes the time pressure off a bit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
But at the same time, we have colleagues in this forum opening PPs and not doing nearly so well. Where is the catch? I'm genuinely asking that because I am still curious about how is the reality of psychiatry here in America. I have a feeling I will get disappointed and find the same problems I had in Brazil, but hopefully, I am wrong. I also heard dozens of stories like that before graduating there, just to learn that those were 1-2 professionals in each city that were not the best ones, but in most cases the sketchiest ones.

Bottom point, how feasible it is to open a cash PP and charge 300-400$ an hour?

There's a lot of variables this depends on . Region of the country, socioeconomic status of the area the practice is in, how much you're going to vet patients before accepting them, how quickly you want to be charging $300-400/hr, your connections to other professionals/organizations in the area, etc. Someone in my area who completed a CAP fellowship at my program could probably open a cash-only practice, charge $300/hr, and fill in 6 months or less as there's a massive shortage for child psych in our area, especially for certain areas (getting an autism eval with a specialist was a 14 month wait last time I checked). Try opening a cash practice in BFE, Montana then you better have a lot of cash at your disposal, the best business plan possible, and crazy connections to start something like this up.


And don't forget the 35% no show...

And that's the best part of cash only (financially). The guy I rotated with in med school charged full price for no-shows unless the appointment was cancelled at least 48 hours in advance. Because of this he typically would have 0 or 1 no-show per day and retained a lot of great patients who had a good sense of personal responsibility. I'm not sure about if this is feasible with insurance (if anyone with experience knows, I'd love to hear about it), but definitely can't do this with medicare/medicaid.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
And that's the best part of cash only (financially). The guy I rotated with in med school charged full price for no-shows unless the appointment was cancelled at least 48 hours in advance. Because of this he typically would have 0 or 1 no-show per day and retained a lot of great patients who had a good sense of personal responsibility. I'm not sure about if this is feasible with insurance (if anyone with experience knows, I'd love to hear about it), but definitely can't do this with medicare/medicaid.

I currently charge a late cancellation fee (less than 24 hours notice) and for no-show charge a fee equivalent to full cash rate for the appointment for out of pocket and insurance clients alike. All the therapists at the group I am working with do the same with their insurance clients. Typically everybody gets one freebie and if someone is extremely regular and dependable (and who generally are immediately reaching out to reschedule) I probably won't be charging either but it does cut down quite a lot on no-shows. My show rate is probably north of 90%.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
I currently charge a late cancellation fee (less than 24 hours notice) and for no-show charge a fee equivalent to full cash rate for the appointment for out of pocket and insurance clients alike. All the therapists at the group I am working with do the same with their insurance clients. Typically everybody gets one freebie and if someone is extremely regular and dependable (and who generally are immediately reaching out to reschedule) I probably won't be charging either but it does cut down quite a lot on no-shows. My show rate is probably north of 90%.

So are the patients paying that full rate for the no show? I’d be surprised if insurance reimbursed for services not rendered.
 
Insurance certainly does not. This is a fee patients are paying. I do not see people until they have completed our intake paperwork, which involves a) signing an agreement about the terms and conditions of these fees and b) getting a credit card number to put on file. Thus, it is fairly easy to collect these agreed-upon fees when necessary, which is rarely. It also makes it much easier to deal with situations where initial consultations find out they have a deductible to meet after our first appointment and just disappear.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Another problem with Medicare is that most patients have secondary insurance, which increases the complexity of billing. Also, Medicare patients will frequently switch to Medicare advantage plans, which can create even more problems
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Try opening a cash practice in BFE, Montana then you better have a lot of cash at your disposal, the best business plan possible, and crazy connections to start something like this up.
Supposedly only one psychiatrist in eastern montana and she charges cash ($200/hr which is reasonable for the state): The State With the Highest Suicide Rate Desperately Needs Shrinks

as an aside, montana actually has a disproportionate number of tech billionaires and venture capitalists.
 
And don't forget the 35% no show...
if you have a no show rate of 35% you are doing something wrong. I have a no show rate of less than 10% and I do see some medicare pts.
Also telemedicine really helps cut down on no-shows. Even before COVID I would convert office visits to video for pts who were "too sick" or had transport issues.
You also need to select appropriate patients. My patients are very respectful of my time. I give out my direct line, my email and they can message through the EMR and no one abuses this. Patients offer to pay for missed sessions. The system really favors psychiatrists right now so you can select patients who want treatment and are respectful of your time. And I would argue that we have an ethical obligation to focus on patients who are most able to benefit from our care. I assume all patients have reasons to be invested in their illness and address this in the first session. if they are not ready to get better, that is okay and I wont continue seeing them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6 users
if you have a no show rate of 35% you are doing something wrong. I have a no show rate of less than 10% and I do see some medicare pts.
Also telemedicine really helps cut down on no-shows. Even before COVID I would convert office visits to video for pts who were "too sick" or had transport issues.

Something I noticed as well during the latter part of residency. tele-med really improved compliance and treatment of the sickest patients and shows how under-utilized it's been in psych. For some, it should be the preferred option regardless if they can realistically make it to the appt or not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Supposedly only one psychiatrist in eastern montana and she charges cash ($200/hr which is reasonable for the state): The State With the Highest Suicide Rate Desperately Needs Shrinks

as an aside, montana actually has a disproportionate number of tech billionaires and venture capitalists.

But those billionaires and venture capitalists probably think nothing of flying to SF to see their super fancy shrinks, I am not sure they are looking for local talent.
 
Supposedly only one psychiatrist in eastern montana and she charges cash ($200/hr which is reasonable for the state): The State With the Highest Suicide Rate Desperately Needs Shrinks

as an aside, montana actually has a disproportionate number of tech billionaires and venture capitalists.

Agreed. It is possible to open a cash practice almost anywhere. People will come for good care. Now the rates may vary quite a bit. $600 for an eval in NYC wouldn’t surprise me. Neither would $175 in South Dakota. Obviously cost of living is vastly different. Psychiatrists may make more money doing insurance in some areas over cash only, but life isn’t all about money. With high deductible plans, cash only psychiatrists can be cheaper than insurance based psychiatrists.

Marketing, advertising, etc is more important with a cash practice, but it isn’t excessive either.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
if you have a no show rate of 35% you are doing something wrong. I have a no show rate of less than 10% and I do see some medicare pts.
Also telemedicine really helps cut down on no-shows. Even before COVID I would convert office visits to video for pts who were "too sick" or had transport issues.
You also need to select appropriate patients. My patients are very respectful of my time. I give out my direct line, my email and they can message through the EMR and no one abuses this. Patients offer to pay for missed sessions. The system really favors psychiatrists right now so you can select patients who want treatment and are respectful of your time. And I would argue that we have an ethical obligation to focus on patients who are most able to benefit from our care. I assume all patients have reasons to be invested in their illness and address this in the first session. if they are not ready to get better, that is okay and I wont continue seeing them.
Thanks for sharing this. Can you also share how you identify patients who are not ready to get better and how the discussion to discharge them from your clinic usually goes? I don’t have the ability to discharge patients because I am still a resident, so it is nice to hear how things are done outside of this setting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Supposedly only one psychiatrist in eastern montana and she charges cash ($200/hr which is reasonable for the state): The State With the Highest Suicide Rate Desperately Needs Shrinks

as an aside, montana actually has a disproportionate number of tech billionaires and venture capitalists.

Okay, aside from some of the states with literally single digit psychiatrists (I think WY also has this situation), cash practice is harder to maintain in rural area and I’ve never actually met any cash only rural psychs despite knowing quite a few.

I can see this changing with the rise of telemedicine, but I’ve mostly lived in what people consider flyover states and the only docs I’ve met able to sustain cash only are in cities/suburbs. Maybe it’s a geographical thing, maybe people just don’t do it here, idk. Interesting about all those 1%ers having homes in Montana though. I’m going to have to look into their tax laws up there.
 
Okay, aside from some of the states with literally single digit psychiatrists (I think WY also has this situation), cash practice is harder to maintain in rural area and I’ve never actually met any cash only rural psychs despite knowing quite a few.

I can see this changing with the rise of telemedicine, but I’ve mostly lived in what people consider flyover states and the only docs I’ve met able to sustain cash only are in cities/suburbs. Maybe it’s a geographical thing, maybe people just don’t do it here, idk. Interesting about all those 1%ers having homes in Montana though. I’m going to have to look into their tax laws up there.
I heard Kanye West was building a huge mansion in Wyoming, and it may have just been a flight of an idea but he was talking about opening up some sort of Christian commune I think.

Facebook for whatever reason suggested a house to me in Montana that was 15 million. Was sort of like a castle. And it was one of the ugliest things I've ever seen. I mean obviously a lot of money spent, but spent so poorly. The siding looked like a castle designed for a cheap amusement park. And it had an indoor gun range in the basement. But that wasn't the ugly part.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
I've been exploring the business end of things this year as I haven't had much exposure to it during residency. I feel like I'm missing something because I've been told by many attending psychiatrists that if you go into private practice, it's not feasible to accept Medicare. Also been told that it's impossible to have a therapy based practice if you take insurance.

However, when I look up the Medicare fee schedule, the lowest reimbursement for a 99213 + 90838 is relatively high. These are the codes for weekly therapy, right? $70 + $115. Doing the math, it comes out to over 250k/year for a normal practice.

Am I missing something?
Conceptually before I started my practice, this was where I started. You want a number to help with projections. A worst case scenario and this was what I prepared for - a medicare only practice. The tricky thing for this is it takes time to build your practice, so what's the rate of growth to get up to this point with a 100% medicare practice? More feasible if you are the geriatrician who targets 20-60% of their practice with rounding in nursing homes. As others have pointed out this GROSS value of 250K is the well with which you draw from to then pay all your overhead. Your lease, you EMR, your phone bill, your liability insurance, business cards, computer cost, office furniture, website creation, website maintenance, etc. To get an idea of what overhead is really like for an insurance based practice, click on my thread:
Post #221 has a decent snap shot of what overhead can look like for a 3 month period (a quarter).

Its not impossible to have a therapy only practice if you take insurance - those doctors are wrong - it will likely mean you will make less per hour than what a more med check focused practice could achieve. Are you prepared to make less money for this model of an insurance based therapy practice? Perhaps you can skew things in your favor and only take the top paying insurance in your local area - assuming they actually pay more than medicare. But now that you limited your insurance panel, how long will it take you to fill with just Orange Crescent Moon insurance? Then again, how saturated is your market? How many ARNPs and Psychiatrists in your area, or perhaps even NDs?

That 250K, after you subtract your overhead (mine is currently about ~80K) will then need to subtract your health insurance. Do you have a family? For me and my family my health insurance + HSA contribution comes out to about ~20K per year, purchased directly from an insurance company. So that brings you to (250K - 80K overhead - 20k health insurance = 150K), which will need to subtract retirement so multiply by 0.8 (20% to SEP-IRA we'll say), which brings this (150K to 120K). Now you need to pay taxes on that 120K, which also is about 20%, leaving you with (120K x 0.8 = 96K). 96K divided by 12 months comes out to about 8K/month NET.

Medicaid is a much lower payor than Medicare and definitely off the table in my state. Medicare has more strings attached than commercial plans, but it generally pays easier. It often reimbursed less than commercial plans though.

How are you calculating your $250k?

$185/hr is terrible pre-overhead. Most people wouldn’t start a pp with those numbers.

I actually dove in head first with my practice with projections of $180/hr.

What I think OP is also forgetting here is the facility fee part of things for hospital systems. When you're part of a hospital system working in a clinic seeing mostly Medicare patients, the hospital is also billing a facility fee to Medicare (which you can't bill if your'e solo if I'm remembering correctly). So the hospital can afford to pay you 250K with benefits because you end up bringing in more than that overall with your professional + facility fee (which offsets things like the billing department, front office staff, etc).

Also remember that hospitals will allow a bit of loss in order to provide a service that they really need in the system and will just make up for it with higher billing procedures/specialities. So if they need geri-psych or a psychiatrist that takes medicare cause they have a bunch of patients being referred from primary care with nowhere to go, they''ll take a little bit of a loss to recruit someone for these patients.

So yes, in short it's much more feasible to work for a larger system taking Medicare than trying to carve that out on your own.

Facility fee billing is diminishing. Some places are being called out on this, and some patients are paying attention and putting their foot down. I believe Medicare also is doing away with facility fees for outpatient services. Better health/hospital systems see the value in Psychiatry and are willing ro run some loss in the department for greater population management. Scat filled Big Box shops - which is is the increasing trend - are less likely and willing to axe psych departments / staff, or having shady medicare reducing intake processes. I know of one organization that limits by county/parish/borough - which is not permitted by medicare.

Facility fee billing is not an option for private practice doctors.

1) You have to hire a clearinghouse to bill Medicare, which will increase overhead.

2) You’d be well served to look at the legal industry’s information about how many in office hours become billable hours. Being in the office for 40hrs does not equate to billing for 40hrs. Pre-auths, billing inquiries, patient communications, forms, phone calls, bathroom breaks, business management, staff management, and general life hassles will destroy how many hours you can actually bill for, and get paid. Even if you’re a god, and write down every instance of 99080, and get paid for that.

3) The population base is inherently prone to behaviors that will mess up your hourly average. The elderly will reschedule at the hint of inclement weather, or the hint of family activities. The cognitively impaired can complain to Medicare that you’ve never seen them, which can trigger an audit. The truly disabled will have some hospitalizations and/or transportation difficulties that interfere with care. The “disabled” will have something better to do.

4) Medicare prohibits sending someone to collections, which can mess up your take home. You can ask, you can beg, but you can’t do much else. Which wouldn’t seem so bad, until you realize that since Medicare is a governmental agency, so violations are felonies, not civil matters.

5) Medicare is notorious for stopping all payments when you move offices. They move slow in processing the paperwork. So you can sit around, paying staff, hoping that your huge check arrives in the next couple months.

6) Carefully look at the provider enrollment agreement. There are MANY requirements that you would never suspect.

Edit: 7) remember that in PP your own health insurance (but NOT your own occupation disability insurance) goes into your overhead. That complicates how you estimate that.

As PsyDr pointed out Medicare patients take more time, energy than non-medicare patients. This eats into the bottom line. I currently take medicare because my original plans to do ECT. I'm not doing ECT as things happened to unfold. I will eventually by opting out of Medicare which will allow me to take cash for medicare patients. The young patients who are on medicare for disability are often more consuming or complex and require more time than just whats scheduled for appointment. Get a call or message, 'oh, by the way doctor crisis X just happened and I'm suicidal again' or 'my eating disorder is worse, I'm passing out, barely able to stand but no, I won't go to the hospital or do another eating disorder residential program.' Or your patient is willing to do chemical dependency treatment or go to an eating disorder clinic [needs higher level of care] but you can't find any facility to take medicare. Or they need a psychologist, because well you are the med check Psychiatrist, and none of the psychologists take medicare or are full and not accepting new clients. Or you get medicare patients who are pissed at their adult children, but don't want to do any therapy of there own or really work on themselves - which is fine if they are stable - but when they routinely have exacerbation of mood symptoms +/- SI, its frustrating that they don't want to do any PHP/IOP and even if they did, unlikely to get approved - let alone see a psychologist. Medicare, even for your 20yo on disability, requires a prior auth for ridiculous meds like vistaril. Medicare has difficult to understand EOB statements with "sequestration" deductions in them. To top it off, medicare requires you to have CMS Fraud and abuse training yearly. You know those institutional bureaucratic pointless training modules you do every year? Many of those are because of Medicare/CMS. Medicare patients, are prone to also poorly select their advantage plans, so they end up on an HMO!!!!! Not only are they limited already with medicare they doubly worse it by picking the HMO variety - but have no clue what they, or more likely the health care broker had just selected for them. My only patient that won't do telemedicine visits, is medicare aged patient - so I lose money because these are billed as phone call encounters. The differentials expand tremendously with geriatric patients, for instance I have one now that likely has some form of cancer, that I have been coordinating the atypical nature of symptoms with their PCP, to do more substantial work ups on, and low and behold has clots of unknown origin now... Trying to coordinate with PCPs is pain at some places because they just list their institution phone number that requires 5 minutes of navigating their Scat phone trees - instead of being professionally courteous and say here is my cell phone, call me at 5PM on my drive home from work. Oh, and we haven't even touched upon the interpreter needs of a Medicare beneficiary - which come out of your pocket... Medicare patients also struggle the future that is here and now, online scheduling, online portals, passwords, emails/portal messages, online bill pay, etc.

No thanks... I'm ready to opt out as of yesterday.

I've been called on my after hours phone twice in the past 2 years. Once by a patient who thought their cold was serotonin syndrome, and once by a geriatric patient who didn't understand what the after hours phone was for.

Another problem with Medicare is that most patients have secondary insurance, which increases the complexity of billing. Also, Medicare patients will frequently switch to Medicare advantage plans, which can create even more problems

Yeah, this is a pain. Exciting for my assistant at first to learn and figure out but even with the several months it took us to understand nuances, including one insurance you have to wait 30 days for the primary medicare to post its EOB, before submitting to the secondary - otherwise they deny it - completely adds extra time for support staff which means mone, higher overhead.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Scat filled Big Box shops - which is is the increasing trend - are less likely and willing to axe psych departments / staff, or having shady medicare reducing intake processes.
Do you mean big box shops are less likely to close psych, or they are more willing to close psych depts? And if the latter, have you seen this happen and how does it go down? Feel free to PM me if you don't want to derail the thread.
 
Do you mean big box shops are less likely to close psych, or they are more willing to close psych depts? And if the latter, have you seen this happen and how does it go down? Feel free to PM me if you don't want to derail the thread.

Our hospital system just shut down multiple inpatient psych units, accounting for almost 20% of inpt MH beds statewide. They've also lost a handful of psychiatrists over the past 3 years in one hospital and have almost exclusively replaced them with NPs. Not sure how it's looking elsewhere, but not great here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
I feel they are more likely to close down. My local area one Big Box shop axed their whole department at a main site. Small comparatively, but they had just invested in 1-2 years prior in a TMS line. It goes down by getting an email that says they are going to close things down at this date in the future and your services will no longer be needed.

I previously had worked at a Big Box shop that year after year was neglecting the growth of the department. I did my part and started 2 different service lines, but even after my exodus they aren't expanding - despite community need - and they aren't changing their ways to improve retention of Psychiatrists, or even the ARNPs.

Its rare to have quality management in a Big Box shop health system to see the utility and importance of quality Psychiatry for overall community improvement, health outcomes, resource utilization reduction, etc, etc. Even an HMO like Kaiser which somewhat gets it, still ticks their employees off and you usually see the Mental Health departments are the ones striking at various locations in the country.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Our hospital system just shut down multiple inpatient psych units, accounting for almost 20% of inpt MH beds statewide. They've also lost a handful of psychiatrists over the past 3 years in one hospital and have almost exclusively replaced them with NPs. Not sure how it's looking elsewhere, but not great here.

Almost the opposite with the biggest system in these parts. The psychiatry department itself is a research behemoth pulling vast sums in NIMH/NIH/NSF dollars so it will never be in serious danger, but if anything the people who fancy themselves leadership would expand inpatient beds if anything. Every few years they have to be talked down from axing all outpatient services because they are not nearly as profitable and in some cases are being subsidized heavily by revenues from IP.
 
Almost the opposite with the biggest system in these parts. The psychiatry department itself is a research behemoth pulling vast sums in NIMH/NIH/NSF dollars so it will never be in serious danger, but if anything the people who fancy themselves leadership would expand inpatient beds if anything. Every few years they have to be talked down from axing all outpatient services because they are not nearly as profitable and in some cases are being subsidized heavily by revenues from IP.

Probably a difference in patient population. This specific population serves mostly low income, medicare, medicaid. Ever since a merger several years back, they've wanted to shuffle off a lot of these services as they were hemorrhaging money. They used the COVID pandemic as a way to do it without taking as big of a PR hit.
 
There are at least two child psychiatrists in my metro who are cash-only and charge rates like this. They are not quite as ludicrously full as their insurance-accepting counterparts but they still have waitlists. Child is a whole 'nother thing, though.

Adult-wise $300-350 an hour seems like the standard-ish cash rate around here. I am not privy to exactly how full the various cash-only psychiatrists are around here but some have been at it for a while and seem to still be making a go of it. I will see is that folks in this area tend to expect to be able to use their insurance but that's fine because the better insurances end up reimbursing pretty close to that rate with appropriate use of add-on codes.

That major difference is how quickly you will fill. There is a reason "take a part time job and build PP on the side" is a classic, takes the time pressure off a bit.
My theory is it's all about economics.

In a city like Boston, there are wayyyy more rich patients with the need to find celebrity-tier psychiatrists than providers available. You could flood the city with another 500 MH providers (psychiatrists, SWs, psychologists, psych NPs) each year and the rates won't even budge.

Whereas imagine if you have a PP clinic out in middlewhere America, it doesn't matter if you're the only psychiatrist in 100 mile, if there's not enough wealthy clientele then your clinic won't thrive.
 
Top