Why do podiatry get paid as high as some surgeons

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

surag

kobayashi
10+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2006
Messages
610
Reaction score
2
Just out of curiosity why do pods get paid as much as some surgeons?

I've heard that the avg salary for a podiatry foot ankle doctor can get paid as much as 200k a year.

Are they as qualified as an MD + the 7 year or 8 year residency? Why the high pay? Would this be a viable model for other surgical procedures, hand surgeons etc.?

Also, looking it from a different perspective, should ortho surgeons be paid less?

Why would an orthopedic surgeon even bother to go into FA surgery when pods are getting paid nearly as much with less time in training etc?

Members don't see this ad.
 
The average tends to be a little lower than that for one thing. There is a residency they go through for surgical stuff. Procedures tend to get reimbursed higher with the current system. A podiatrist can crank out tons of procedures, as well as do some pretty serious surgeries on the foot and ankle. It is just a different pathway. They are well trained (some schools have classes with the med school).
 
Around here, Ortho Foot/Ankle gets paid twice that. There aren't a lot of people who want to or know how to deal with the foot.

It's only 6 years of post-grad training after med school, not 7 or 8. Whether a dpm is as good as a fellowship trained orthopedic surgeon is debated. In general, I would rather have a orthopedic foot/ankle surgeon than a dpm, not that most dpms aren't qualified within their scope.

No, orthopedic surgeons should not be paid less.

It is not a viable model for hand surgery. Feet need to be able to bear wear and allow walking. Toes can be fused, midfoot can be fused, the foot can be mangled and still be somewhat functional. Most F/A surgery I've seen tends to be based on biomechanics. Hands need to retain dexterity, flexibility, sensation, etc. Hand surgery combines techniques from plastics, orthopedics, neuro, and microvascular surgery. It takes more than 2-3 years to master that stuff.

Orthopedic surgeons go into F/A usally because they enjoy it. I think the pay is easily much more than a dpm, at least in my area.
 
Members don't see this ad :)
The average tends to be a little lower than that for one thing. There is a residency they go through for surgical stuff. Procedures tend to get reimbursed higher with the current system. A podiatrist can crank out tons of procedures, as well as do some pretty serious surgeries on the foot and ankle. It is just a different pathway. They are well trained (some schools have classes with the med school).

Ahh, I see...interesting. you mention training...from what I understand residency is about 2 or 3 years...which is understandable seeing as how their 4 years of education is probably about FA as well. However, if this is the case...why would an MD ever choose ortho and then a FA fellowship?

Also, is this fair, in general for surgeons? Couldn't this be used as a bargaining chip for higher pay, considering how many more hours/years training the spend working/learning? I mean much higher pay than the 200-300k they earn now.
 
Ahh, I see...interesting. you mention training...from what I understand residency is about 2 or 3 years...which is understandable seeing as how their 4 years of education is probably about FA as well. However, if this is the case...why would an MD ever choose ortho and then a FA fellowship?

Also, is this fair, in general for surgeons? Couldn't this be used as a bargaining chip for higher pay, considering how many more hours/years training the spend working/learning? I mean much higher pay than the 200-300k they earn now.

I'm not sure if I completely understand your Q, but MD's pick ortho because they're MD's. You pick the MD route first, then ortho. Sometimes you know before-hand, but most don't, and even if they do, everyone has to be open to the possibility of a different field if they don't match.

After an ortho residency, you have the opportunity to pursue other sub-specialties. If feet are your thing, they're an option. That's why MD's pick this route. Others prefer hands, hips, trauma, peds, etc.

The pay thing isn't an issue. Good fellowship-trained orthopods make double what podiatrists make. 200-300 would be a very low number. Double it.
 
I'm not sure if I completely understand your Q, but MD's pick ortho because they're MD's. You pick the MD route first, then ortho. Sometimes you know before-hand, but most don't, and even if they do, everyone has to be open to the possibility of a different field if they don't match.

After an ortho residency, you have the opportunity to pursue other sub-specialties. If feet are your thing, they're an option. That's why MD's pick this route. Others prefer hands, hips, trauma, peds, etc.

The pay thing isn't an issue. Good fellowship-trained orthopods make double what podiatrists make. 200-300 would be a very low number. Double it.

I dunno dude...everyone I hear from says that the avg salary for an ortho+fellowship is b/w 250-350. maybe I'm wrong because these are academic centers? I dunno...still I just think that pods salaries are unfairly high compared to what MDs have to go through. I'm also afraid of saying anymore because then it'll turn into a flame war....yes?
 
I dunno dude...everyone I hear from says that the avg salary for an ortho+fellowship is b/w 250-350. maybe I'm wrong because these are academic centers? I dunno...still I just think that pods salaries are unfairly high compared to what MDs have to go through. I'm also afraid of saying anymore because then it'll turn into a flame war....yes?

F/A orthos and pods both can make a ton of money. It just depends on the practioner. Some pods make 500k a year. Some make 80k. I'd say it's easier for a F/A ortho to make better money but it can be done in both professions with hard work.

As far as it being "unfair" for pods to make 200k, I don't see why you have an issue with that. With seven years of training focusing on the foot/ankle, I think we're qualified to do what we do. I'm not going to get into the debate about who is better between pod/FA ortho, as that's more dependant on the individual practioner/experience rather than the degree one has.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
F/A orthos and pods both can make a ton of money. It just depends on the practioner. Some pods make 500k a year. Some make 80k. I'd say it's easier for a F/A ortho to make better money but it can be done in both professions with hard work.

As far as it being "unfair" for pods to make 200k, I don't see why you have an issue with that. With seven years of training focusing on the foot/ankle, I think we're qualified to do what we do. I'm not going to get into the debate about who is better between pod/FA ortho, as that's more dependant on the individual practioner/experience rather than the degree one has.

Well I only think its unfair compared to what a OB/Gyn does/ a urologist does etc. All these physicians are facing far more risk and difficulty yet the current market doesnt reward them that much more if at all. Thats my only concern about it. They face greater risk as well as are in greater demand than say a FA pods.
 
Most podiatrists are primarily concerned with peddling orthotics. No matter what your problem is, they attribute it to 'overpronation' and prescribe orthotics. Planter fasciitis? Overpronation. Shin splints? Overpronation. Knee pain? Overpronation. Back pain? Overpronation. They have no concept that pronation could be a normal mechanical event and that the foot is well suited to pronate without the support of orthotics. The whole speciality desperately needs an ideological overhaul. They are just like the psychiatrists who see everything in terms of mental illness.
 
hmm...i'm afraid that over generalization may lead to a flame war...which i really don't want.

That said, why do you believe that? have you had experience alongside podiatrists?

Also, will their income fall significantly in the near future much like physician income is expected to?
 
hmm...i'm afraid that over generalization may lead to a flame war...which i really don't want.

That said, why do you believe that? have you had experience alongside podiatrists?

Also, will their income fall significantly in the near future much like physician income is expected to?

I doubt it, you can consider them primary foot care. Someone has to look at those disgusting diabetic feet and cut their disgusting diabetic toe nails. Proper foot care can prevent an amputation down the line which is the epitome of primary care/preventative medicine. If anything I expect them to get a boost.

Also it looks like they are getting a 6% boost under the new redistribution of reimbursement model.
 
I doubt it, you can consider them primary foot care. Someone has to look at those disgusting diabetic feet and cut their disgusting diabetic toe nails. Proper foot care can prevent an amputation down the line which is the epitome of primary care/preventative medicine. If anything I expect them to get a boost.

Also it looks like they are getting a 6% boost under the new redistribution of reimbursement model.

thats stupid....IMO. lol. I think its unfair that they want to cut down the reimbursement rates to entertain the populist idealism and then give increases to certain groups. Will Chiropractors get increases as well? Just ridiculous. I'd rather see physician income increase in reimbursements or at least put that money for RNs, PAs...
 
Members don't see this ad :)
thats stupid....IMO. lol. I think its unfair that they want to cut down the reimbursement rates to entertain the populist idealism and then give increases to certain groups. Will Chiropractors get increases as well? Just ridiculous. I'd rather see physician income increase in reimbursements or at least put that money for RNs, PAs...

Chiropractors look like they are getting a 5% increase.
CRNAs are getting a 2% increase and they already make more than the average FP, IM, and Peds MD with fewer hours worked and less training.
NP and PAs are getting increases.
Social workers are getting cut by 6% and they probably save more healthcare dollars than anyone on that list by getting people placement and out of the hospital.

The logic behind the changes makes no sense and is very obvious that money talks in politics. Groups that give lots of money to the government for various legal battles, did well; those who don't did not. Examples (CRNAs +2% vs Anesthesia +6%) (Ophtho +11% vs Optometry +12%) (NPs +7% vs Primary Care +8%) You know who doesn't have a strong lobby, social workers.

Now this is just the proposed changes, but since it costs nothing to just shuffle around the reimbursements, I would not be surprised if something similar to this current proposal goes through.
 
where are these numbers coming from?
 
From the "Medicare plans to cut specialist' payments" thread in the general residency forum.

http://forums.studentdoctor.net/showthread.php?t=642824

Half way down the first page Taurus has a post that highlights the main points with a link to the actual document. The link used to work but it looks like they took it down.
 
I dunno dude...everyone I hear from says that the avg salary for an ortho+fellowship is b/w 250-350. maybe I'm wrong because these are academic centers? I dunno...still I just think that pods salaries are unfairly high compared to what MDs have to go through. I'm also afraid of saying anymore because then it'll turn into a flame war....yes?

There's nothing to debate here. There are plenty of online sites with average figures for doctor salaries by specialty. Check them out and quit wasting our time.
 
Just out of curiosity why do pods get paid as much as some surgeons?

I've heard that the avg salary for a podiatry foot ankle doctor can get paid as much as 200k a year.

Are they as qualified as an MD + the 7 year or 8 year residency? Why the high pay? Would this be a viable model for other surgical procedures, hand surgeons etc.?

Also, looking it from a different perspective, should ortho surgeons be paid less?

Why would an orthopedic surgeon even bother to go into FA surgery when pods are getting paid nearly as much with less time in training etc?

You are wrong. F/A orthos easily make twice as much as an average pod and that's just fresh out of residency. We have to work hard a few years out to even reach 200K. You guys got it good. Most pods work in private or group practices. And since our field is highly procedural, if you're a good business man, you'll make money. End of story. Just look at the pod forums.

We are very qualified at what we do for the Foot & ankle considering all 7 years of our training involves foot & ankle. At some of our schools we take exact basic science courses w/ the med students plus/minus a few classes like lower extremity anatomy for us or psychiatry for you guys. And then the clinical years are completely different.

A F/A orthopod went through medical school, orthopedic residency...and at most a 12 month fellowship focusing on F&A. You decide for yourself who is more qualified to treat your feet.
 
Most podiatrists are primarily concerned with peddling orthotics. No matter what your problem is, they attribute it to 'overpronation' and prescribe orthotics. Planter fasciitis? Overpronation. Shin splints? Overpronation. Knee pain? Overpronation. Back pain? Overpronation. They have no concept that pronation could be a normal mechanical event and that the foot is well suited to pronate without the support of orthotics. The whole speciality desperately needs an ideological overhaul. They are just like the psychiatrists who see everything in terms of mental illness.


Are you just speaking out of your ass? I've treated HUNDREDS of patients this year in my training and only had to cast for orthotics a total of 2 times so far. Sure, it's a quick way to make a few bucks but we only prescribe it if indicated. Most of the time, patients already have good built in arch support in their running shoes or already come in with their own pre-fabricated orthotics...so we see no reason to prescribe more.

We desperately need an ideological overhaul? dude, we're not chiros. our treatments are evidence based. yenno..the kinds supported by data and peer reviewed literature? I suppose you think we blame fungal nails on overpronation too?

btw, the term "overpronation" is so general that my attendings would probably scratch their eyeballs out if I ever used it in one of my charts. We are very specific in podiatry...posterior tibial tendon dysfunction...talipes planovalgus....flexible forefoot valgus or supinatus...and more. Each can manifest the same symptoms but with different etiologies and would require different approaches in surgery. never "overpronation."
 
Last edited:
We are very qualified at what we do for the Foot & ankle considering all 7 years of our training involves foot & ankle ... You decide for yourself who is more qualified to treat your feet.

Good thing podiatry patients are only lower extremities and the rest of their body and state of health is irrelevant to their treatment...:p
 
Good thing podiatry patients are only lower extremities and the rest of their body and state of health is irrelevant to their treatment...:p

Yea I always wondered about that. There might as well be only hand and wrist doctors and elbow doctors and thigh doctors.

I think its mostly because foot injuries are more common and thus a viable and economic model exists. I mean, who actually goes into podiatry with the intent of...yeaa I want to be a podiatrist.

these sort of things need to be overhauled. I have no question that a podiatrist is a well qualified individual. But if this career path is chosen over an MD because its easier to get into/cheaper or because there are less number of years involved when you can start practicing then it no doubt adversely affects the cost of medicine.

I'll bet the charges an F and A doctor who is a podiatrist are about the same as a ortho for the same procedures. Which is why a pods can make as much as 200k. The fact of the matter is, as long as such overspecialization exists then we will have such high costs for medicine.

Again, pods are legit doctors...I have no issues with it, just the way this all is set up. If anything, podiatry should have become a part of medicine and taught through residency or a longer fellowship like everything else is.
 
avg salary for F&A orthopaedist - $400
avg salary for a pod - $160

I have recently run across a podiatrist that has gone through an orthopaedic F&A fellowship program (can anyone enlighten me on this possibility?). He will probably make more out of the gates...
 
avg salary for F&A orthopaedist - $400
avg salary for a pod - $160

I have recently run across a podiatrist that has gone through an orthopaedic F&A fellowship program (can anyone enlighten me on this possibility?). He will probably make more out of the gates...

This is an exception, not a rule for the reason that it really doesn't serve much of a point. If you didn't get a lot of rearfoot/ankle trauma and reconstruction in podiatric residency, then it may be beneficial. Otherwise, we do three years of foot and ankle surgery so another six months to a year probably wouldn't add much. I suppose it wouldn't hurt if you were looking to go in with an ortho group either.

I think for some of the ortho foot and ankle fellowship programs, they just want to fill the slots which isn't so easy these days. I do know a few guys that have done it but most don't.
 
This is an exception, not a rule for the reason that it really doesn't serve much of a point. If you didn't get a lot of rearfoot/ankle trauma and reconstruction in podiatric residency, then it may be beneficial. Otherwise, we do three years of foot and ankle surgery so another six months to a year probably wouldn't add much. I suppose it wouldn't hurt if you were looking to go in with an ortho group either.

I think for some of the ortho foot and ankle fellowship programs, they just want to fill the slots which isn't so easy these days. I do know a few guys that have done it but most don't.

Hmm Exception, I highly contest that. The compensation is for a F&A ortho pod is substantially higher than that of a podiatrist. F&A orthopods can take general ortho call and treat fractures proximal to the ankle where as pods cannot. This is a huge revenue generator.
Also simple stastistic, if the AVERAGE compensation is 400k for a F&A orthopod vs 160 for a podiatrist, how is this an exception?
 
Hmm Exception, I highly contest that. The compensation is for a F&A ortho pod is substantially higher than that of a podiatrist. F&A orthopods can take general ortho call and treat fractures proximal to the ankle where as pods cannot. This is a huge revenue generator.
Also simple stastistic, if the AVERAGE compensation is 400k for a F&A orthopod vs 160 for a podiatrist, how is this an exception?

What? I was answering the previous posters question about pods doing foot and ankle fellowships after residency. I said nothing about salary and am really not sure how you got that out of my post. :D
 
Last edited:
There's nothing to debate here. There are plenty of online sites with average figures for doctor salaries by specialty. Check them out and quit wasting our time.

those so called salary figures are complete BS and you can pick three different figures and see that they're all different.
 
Last edited:
I doubt it, you can consider them primary foot care. Someone has to look at those disgusting diabetic feet and cut their disgusting diabetic toe nails. Proper foot care can prevent an amputation down the line which is the epitome of primary care/preventative medicine. If anything I expect them to get a boost.

Also it looks like they are getting a 6% boost under the new redistribution of reimbursement model.

That may have been the case a decade or two ago but nowadays we go through 4 years in schooling and 3 years of surgical residency - By the end of my training, I will be trained in reconstructive foot and ankle surgery. Not every podiatrist is training to become the "epitome" as you've eloquently mentioned, in primary/preventative foot care. Yes there is a demand and place in treating diabetic foot ulcers, toenail and skin infections, but there is an even greater demand for managing diabetic foot infections (i.e. gas gangrenes), neuroarthropathy management, foot/ankle reconstruction especially in patients with neurological conditions i.e. Cerebral Palsy, Charcot Marie Toothe, and post-CVA, etc. The list can go on, but the point I am making is that our training has adjusted over the recent years to fill these voids and as a result, there is a growing demand for surgically trained DPM's. This explains the trend for our recent graduates to join multispecialty MD groups and of course Orthopedic groups.

As for your previous statement regarding the overprescription of Orthotics, again I respectively disagree. Our current training based on allopathic philosophy and evidence based medicine - in fact, a significant portion of our residency is invested at off-service rotations that include Internal Medicine, Infectious Disease, Vascular Surgery, and Plastic Surgery amongst other MD/DO rotations as well. While on these services, we round on that respective service's patients, write orders, prescriptions, and essentially function as any other resident on that service. Point here is that our training and education is scientific and evidence based in nature. I can't speak for every podiatrist of course, but I am merely speaking from the perspective of a new DPM in-training.
 
That may have been the case a decade or two ago but nowadays we go through 4 years in schooling and 3 years of surgical residency - By the end of my training, I will be trained in reconstructive foot and ankle surgery. Not every podiatrist is training to become the "epitome" as you've eloquently mentioned, in primary/preventative foot care. Yes there is a demand and place in treating diabetic foot ulcers, toenail and skin infections, but there is an even greater demand for managing diabetic foot infections (i.e. gas gangrenes), neuroarthropathy management, foot/ankle reconstruction especially in patients with neurological conditions i.e. Cerebral Palsy, Charcot Marie Toothe, and post-CVA, etc. The list can go on, but the point I am making is that our training has adjusted over the recent years to fill these voids and as a result, there is a growing demand for surgically trained DPM's. This explains the trend for our recent graduates to join multispecialty MD groups and of course Orthopedic groups.

As for your previous statement regarding the overprescription of Orthotics, again I respectively disagree. Our current training based on allopathic philosophy and evidence based medicine - in fact, a significant portion of our residency is invested at off-service rotations that include Internal Medicine, Infectious Disease, Vascular Surgery, and Plastic Surgery amongst other MD/DO rotations as well. While on these services, we round on that respective service's patients, write orders, prescriptions, and essentially function as any other resident on that service. Point here is that our training and education is scientific and evidence based in nature. I can't speak for every podiatrist of course, but I am merely speaking from the perspective of a new DPM in-training.

I never said anything about orthotics... I also never said that a pod's practice is limited to primary foot care or that they couldn't do surgery. I was simply posing a rationale for them getting a reimbursement increase under Obama's proposal (because they are not only specialists, but they can also be considered primary care). Nothing more.
 
I never said anything about orthotics... I also never said that a pod's practice is limited to primary foot care or that they couldn't do surgery. I was simply posing a rationale for them getting a reimbursement increase under Obama's proposal (because they are not only specialists, but they can also be considered primary care). Nothing more.

my apologies, the orthotics response was meant to be directed to another poster but i tagged your post by mistake.
 
I dunno dude...everyone I hear from says that the avg salary for an ortho+fellowship is b/w 250-350. maybe I'm wrong because these are academic centers? I dunno...still I just think that pods salaries are unfairly high compared to what MDs have to go through. I'm also afraid of saying anymore because then it'll turn into a flame war....yes?


yah please do elaborate on why do u think its unfair!!?? have u attended Podiatric medical school and graduated with a 4.0? and got into the top Podiatric surgical residency?? and u thought that it was just a piece of cake??????????????
 
yah please do elaborate on why do u think its unfair!!?? have u attended Podiatric medical school and graduated with a 4.0? and got into the top Podiatric surgical residency?? and u thought that it was just a piece of cake??????????????

Hate to put it this way but orthopedic surgeons are the pre-meds who were at the top of their class and went to medical school. Podiatrists were the pre-meds at the bottom of their class and couldn't get into medical school.
I can see your point that getting into a "top podiatric surgical residency" can be difficult, but you can also keep in mind that your competition in podiatry school is at a lower standard than competition students in medical school face.
 
Toledo has a number of podiatrists. I would find it hard to believe that the busiest makes anywhere close to 200k. Toledo also has only 1 F&A fellowship trained ortho. He makes >400k.

My wife who is in her third year of practice makes the same as my residency salary + moonlighting ~ 115k. Granted she works 4 days a week but I think 200k for a podiatrist is the exception and not the rule.

I don't particularly care if they make 500k. Id rather them deal with hallux valgus and disgusting diabetic feet than me.
 
Hate to put it this way but orthopedic surgeons are the pre-meds who were at the top of their class and went to medical school. Podiatrists were the pre-meds at the bottom of their class and couldn't get into medical school.
I can see your point that getting into a "top podiatric surgical residency" can be difficult, but you can also keep in mind that your competition in podiatry school is at a lower standard than competition students in medical school face.
Yeah..........those crazy podiatrists and their 4 years of podiatric medical school after undergrad and their residency to completely specialize in treating the lower extremity that includes reconstructive rearfoot, forefoot, and ankle surgery............goofy guys.........how dare they as premeds consider any other field and THEN have the gall to consider themselves doctors.

The "bottom of the premed barrel" podiatrist who removed my bilateral accessory navicular bones and reattached the tendon to the real navicular bone sure did a pretty good job at the hospital OR.

The "top of his class" orthopedic surgeon said to just let it go and don't worry about it. He didn't seem to care that I was in constant pain.

Oh, and those silly podiatrists fixing club feet and doing reconstructive surgery on ankles in orthopaedic practices are just SO SILLY!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
I think 200k for a podiatrist is the exception and not the rule.

A simple gov BLS search or any other website shows that the average is around 200k. This includes pods that make low 100's in the middle of nowhere, and pods that make 300+ in densely populated areas.
 
I just want to say that who ever started this post has an ample of time in their life!!! Which they should waste it on another career and forget about medicine.! Bc aS soon as you start taking about money issues in medicine, the people listeing to your BS can tell that you ain't serious!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
I dunno dude...everyone I hear from says that the avg salary for an ortho+fellowship is b/w 250-350. maybe I'm wrong because these are academic centers? I dunno...still I just think that pods salaries are unfairly high compared to what MDs have to go through. I'm also afraid of saying anymore because then it'll turn into a flame war....yes?

This post demonstrates a misunderstanding of the way a market economy works. Salaries are not directly related to how hard your job is or how much training you had to go through to get the job. Supply and demand. If the value of a DPMs work was identical to that of a F/A orthopod, the salaries and compensation of the two professions would also be identical.
 
A simple gov BLS search or any other website shows that the average is around 200k. This includes pods that make low 100's in the middle of nowhere, and pods that make 300+ in densely populated areas.
Ok.
 
If the value of a DPMs work was identical to that of a F/A orthopod, the salaries and compensation of the two professions would also be identical.

Anyone who denies the excellent training of today's podiatric residency grads, simply has his/her head in the sand. The argument that orthopods are more qualified is simply obsolete.

Orthopedic foot and ankle surgeons are certainly well trained and should be highly respected. Their fellowship in foot and ankle is 1 year, and it's well documented that their foot and ankle exposure during residency is minimal (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12921364 and http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20067716). Today's podiatric residency grads spend 3 years (some 4), predominately on the foot and ankle, and some also do a fellowship in addition. After I graduate from a three or four year residency + fellowship, I'll have the numbers that the orthopods simply won't have (and I am *only* talking with regards to rearfoot, forefoot, and ankle surgery, nothing more). I don't know about you, but when it came to my surgery as I mentioned in one of my posts above, I wanted someone who simply did the procedure more than anyone else. In my case, this guy happened to be a podiatrist. I have been pain free for years.

There is equality in foot and ankle training, whether some want to admit it or not.
 
Last edited:
Anyone who denies the excellent training of today's podiatric residency grads, simply has his/her head in the sand. The argument that orthopods are more qualified is simply obsolete.

Orthopedic foot and ankle surgeons are certainly well trained and should be highly respected. Their fellowship in foot and ankle is 1 year, and it's well documented that their foot and ankle exposure during residency is minimal (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12921364 and http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20067716). Today's podiatric residency grads spend 3 years (some 4), predominately on the foot and ankle, and some also do a fellowship in addition. After I graduate from a three or four year residency + fellowship, I'll have the numbers that the orthopods simply won't have (and I am *only* talking with regards to rearfoot, forefoot, and ankle surgery, nothing more). I don't know about you, but when it came to my surgery as I mentioned in one of my posts above, I wanted someone who simply did the procedure more than anyone else. In my case, this guy happened to be a podiatrist. I have been pain free for years.

There is equality in foot and ankle training, whether some want to admit it or not.


Seriously? I'll bite. I am responding because I am tired of podiatrists coming onto an ortho forum touting how they are superior in routine and complex F/A and that we as orthopedic surgeons should give up treating the foot and ankle disorders due to lack of experience. How about the 5 years of doing routine cases in foot and ankle during our residency. Maybe this skipped your rudimentary math, but 5 years >3 years. "Anyone who denies the excellent training of today's podiatric residency grads, simply has his/her head in the sand." This comment is so far off I don't even know what to tell you. What planet are you from? At our program, the PODs pick up scraps from the ED to fulfill residency requirements. The orthopedics department probably does on average three times as many foot and ankle cases a week as the podiatrists perform. Don't kid yourself. Yes, we all aren't going into F/A but I assure you as orthopods our training (at my institution) is FAR superior that what the podiatrists receive. Don't make generalizations. Why does it take our podiatrists two and half hours to do simple bimal fractures when we bang these out in 30 minutes? Experience. They don't use AO principles and quite honestly, they don't know what the hell they are doing and this is dangerous. If I showed you post-op X-rays you would laugh (maybe YOU wouldn't). That is with them triple scrubbed. Its a joke. At my program, you aren't better trained. Not even close. Maybe other programs are different, but don't paint with such a large brush. It appears that you aren't even in "residency" yet, so maybe you can make some generalizations once/if you match. If you are in "residency" then good luck once reality stares you in the face. Don't knock what orthopedics does, as quite frankly, you have no idea what you are talking about and you are just making yourself look ignorant. The people with their head in the sand are the ones who think that their "residency" is in actuality legitimate. In the state in which I practice podiatrists can't admit patients, they can't do H&Ps, they can't see workers comp, they can't field routine floor calls, they don't take trauma call, they have no privileges to ankle and foot fractures and quite honestly we are left cleaning up what they mess up. Their residency is in essence diabetic foot wash outs and bunionectomies that come through their attending's office. If that is superior training then you yourself might want to pull your own head out of the sand. No one cares about your personal problems or ailments, really we don't care. Honestly, no one cares. Results are what count, and saying that a podiatrist has more training and is a far superior surgeon is stupid and only exemplifies how ignorant you are. I am writing this to stop you guys coming onto our forum trying to prove yourselves. You can't, won't, and will not convince people you are better trained; so stop. It is getting old and you look desperate. I am tired of reading your comments on our forum. Live with the reality and move on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Oh my goodness, the unrelenting ego is strong with you. Such bravado. Such straw men arguments that give me the impression of a simian banging his chest shouting "I'M BETTER. I'M BETTER. RAWR." Is this the mentality of every orthopedic surgeon? Obviously not, but this post was so hilariously off base and inaccurate that I could not pass the opportunity to respond.

How about the 5 years of doing routine cases in foot and ankle during our residency. Maybe this skipped your rudimentary math, but 5 years >3 years.

Please refer to the pubmed sources I linked above. Orthopedic surgeons train in all aspects of musculoskeletal disorders, and not just the foot and ankle. I made this very clear in my initial post. What exactly is hard to understand, here? It is well documented that those in an orthopedic surgery residency do not receive adequate foot and ankle training, period. You will most certainly need a fellowship if you hope to specialize in that area. Your orthopedics residency program routinely takes on complex foot and ankle cases? Are you sure you aren't in a podiatry residency? :laugh:


"Anyone who denies the excellent training of today's podiatric residency grads, simply has his/her head in the sand." This comment is so far off I don't even know what to tell you. What planet are you from?

The thing is...you don't. This is all you say. Nothing to back it up. I'm not reading an actual argument here other than a thinly veiled attempt of an insult. Essentially, more straw-men. Strong work. :thumbup:

At our program, the PODs pick up scraps from the ED to fulfill residency requirements. The orthopedics department probably does on average three times as many foot and ankle cases a week as the podiatrists perform.

I can't figure out where you are practicing but I can tell you that this mentality is largely limited to that area. Your last sentence is simply false for the rest of the developed country/world. If anything, I will be sure as h*** to avoid your residency program, as it is clearly one of malignancy and superiority complexes. Again, do you actually have sources that directly compare and contrast the number of foot and ankle cases a podiatrists performs over the 7-9 years of training they receive versus an orthopedic surgery resident? :laugh:

Don't kid yourself. Yes, we all aren't going into F/A but I assure you as orthopods our training (at my institution) is FAR superior that what the podiatrists receive.

This was the case 10-15 years ago. When one of my attendings graduated, there was one residency slot for every 4 students. But residency was not required. By law, it now is.

Especially in the last decade, podiatry has evolved largely into a surgical sub-specialty. Now, the only residencies available are surgical residencies. The majority of students now do 3 or 4 year surgical residencies in addition to a fellowship.

By contrast, foot and ankle orthopedists, before deciding that's what they wanted to sub-specialize in, do, at most, 3 to 6 months? Not even a full year. Just for clarification though, we are still solely talking about foot and ankle training, and not general orthopedics. Let me reiterate: we are still solely talking about foot and ankle training, and not general orthopedics. You seem to be a bit rather slow in that regard.


Don't make generalizations. Why does it take our podiatrists two and half hours to do simple bimal fractures when we bang these out in 30 minutes? Experience.

I have been all over the nation and, in fact, have not been to a hospital (Level one and two) where ortho touched below the knee. I will agree that there are pods out there that probably shouldn't be doing some of the things that they are doing. But that can be said about a lot of different docs. You're touting everything you're saying as if it is a fact. This is careless and, in my opinion, dangerously misinformative.


At my program, you aren't better trained. Not even close. Maybe other programs are different, but don't paint with such a large brush.

Your program is probably terrible, sorry to say. Not all podiatry residencies are created equal, and this has been known.

In the state in which I practice podiatrists can't admit patients, they can't do H&Ps, they can't see workers comp, they can't field routine floor calls, they don't take trauma call, they have no privileges to ankle and foot fractures and quite honestly we are left cleaning up what they mess up.

F&A orthos get good training but in no way is it superior to the training that pods have been getting for the last 10 years. Generally speaking in reference to training, pods will perform more foot and ankle procedures in their residency as compared to orthos, F&A ortho included.

And I definitely agree that as the well trained pods continue to take over the field, the way podiatry is viewed will change. This is already being seen in many parts of the country as pods are now chief of medical staff, chief of surgery, etc. In the city that I am currently in, the major hospitals have just changed policy to include podiatrists as medical staff with full admitting privileges. So, slowly but surely, it is coming to pass.


Their residency is in essence diabetic foot wash outs and bunionectomies that come through their attending's office.

Incorrect. And dangerously misinformative once more.

I am writing this to stop you guys coming onto our forum trying to prove yourselves. You can't, won't, and will not convince people you are better trained; so stop. It is getting old and you look desperate. I am tired of reading your comments on our forum. Live with the reality and move on.

I've said it in the past and stand by it, in the end, it just really doesn't matter. In this day and age, there are definitely more similarities than differences in the education. Especially the first couple of years. For the sake of argument, podiatrists find themselves in a very different perdicament than most other health care professionals. Because of their schooling/training, in most cases they end up in the same place as their MD/DO colleagues with the exception that they chose foot and ankle surgery from the beginning and MD/DO's decide towards the end of their schooling.

Podiatrists have admitting privileges and medically manage patients. Podiatrists have full rx rights. Podiatrists are surgeons and take ER/Trauma call, as well as hospital floor call. They are consulted and work with many of their MD/DO counterparts. Podiatrists can be found as hospital CMO's and even Chief of Surgery. How is this any different than an MD/DO specialist?

I've got buddies that are general surgeons, orthopedic surgeons, hospitalists, anesthesiologists, etc and they all practice within their given scope and do a much better job than I would do. I'll practice within my scope and do a better job than any of them. And in the end, we all sit in the Physicians Lounge and make fun of each other. Except for you...maybe you're "that guy" whom everybody in the hospital hates because he has such a chip on his shoulder and a god complex larger than Bono.
 
Last edited:
:stop:

Gigantron is a pre-med/pre-pod.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
:stop:

Gigantron is a pre-med/pre-pod.
If we're going to point fingers, then Hanky is a resident, yet his post reeks of the premed elitism I only see on pre-allo. :\
 
Last edited:
Wow, sounds like an arrogant elitist. I have a relative who had a five year odyssey that began with a misstep on a curb, ending with a severely broken ankle and five years of hell and two orthopods that created a surgical mess. It was problems with a plate, the pins, scar tissue, blah blah, blah! This woman suffered chronic pain and swelling, inability to bear weight, infection, and the list goes on. She had been a former registered nurse who was reduced to being immobile, eventually addicted to pain pills, depressed and was seeing a psychiatrist, and whose weight ballooned-she was a total mess. I told her she should consider seeing a podiatrist. She thought chiropractors and podiatrists were not real medical professionals. After getting the run around, considered a lawsuit, but found that the orthpods would not throw each other under the bus for what had transpired, and out of shear desperation she went to see a podiatrist. It's been three years since he went in a fixed what two orthopods had royally screwed up! She is now fully ambulatory, foot and ankle have finally healed and she has been able to lose some weight. She has a whole new opinion about the skill and expertise of a podiatrist and their highly specialized surgical expertise-she knows first hand who was able to fix her ankle and foot issue- it was podiatrist.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
I'm currently an MSIII at an allopathic school that will be applying to ortho next year. This obviously does not qualify me as an ortho guru, but I've done my fair share of research/clerkship/studying ortho to know more than the average Joe. My brother is a podiatry intern in the same city I'm in medical school. I feel like this gives me a unique perspective into both fields. Here are a few observations my brother and I have made and talked about along the way.

1. Types of people that go into podiatry:
There are generally 3 types of people that go into pod school. (1)A lot of podiatry students do go into podiatry because they couldn't get into med school. Whether the average MCAT is lower for pod students is because they know this going in and therefore don't study as much, or because they just couldn't crack the 30 mark is individual for each person. (2) Others pods are attracted to the dentist-like lifestyle it has traditionally had, while still being able to be surgeons. (3) The third group genuinely enjoys podiatry and were able to put their egos behind them and deal with the onslaught of assaults that they knew were awaiting them and their future profession.

2. Podiatry school is no joke:
Many pod schools legitimately take all of their first and second year classes with the DO students. Instead of taking OMM classes, they take biomechanics/anatomy/etc of the F/A. He was just as stressed as me during my first two years. There are many differences though, mostly during 3rd and 4th year. Examples: (1) My brother took a P/F boards test vs Step 1, which is a scored (and therefore a more stressful) exam. (2) He also never had anything equivalent to a shelf exam after a clerkship. Occasionally the students would return to his campus for a test, but according to him, he wishes podiatry would have shelf-like exams. (3) He didn't do all of the same rotations I've done, which is alright. He may not need to be able to deliver a baby or do a full psych eval, but if pods are expect to admit and manage their own pts, it might be in pods' best interest to do more IM/gen surg (also according to my bro).

3. Podiatry has come a long way from its past, but still has some room for improvement:
The podiatrists these days aren't like the podiatrists of previous generations. Many of them are trained very well in surgery. Many are not. They all do the required 3 year residency. However, this new surgical residency requirement has also created some HUGE problems within the field such as massive residency shortages. There were many (1/6ish) pod grads that failed to match this last cycle and it doesn't seem too bright in the near future (just read the pod blogs). Fixing this, along with making the pod education similar across all schools, will go a long way to making the specialty look better.

Therefore, be nice. Everyone just be nice. We can all get along. We don't have to try to destroy the other field to make ourselves look better. Each field has its attributes that they bring to the field. I look forward to potentially opening a practice with my bro in the future and doing this. I'm sure he'll be better at certain procedures than me and vice versa. Plus we should both hopefully do pretty well financially, although I would love to double his salary!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
She thought chiropractors and podiatrists were not real medical professionals.

I never really understood why people always lumped chiropractors with podiatry. It's like comparing apples to oranges. One clearly functions under evidence based medicine and science while the other just...doesn't.

Therefore, be nice. Everyone just be nice. We can all get along. We don't have to try to destroy the other field to make ourselves look better. Each field has its attributes that they bring to the field. I look forward to potentially opening a practice with my bro in the future and doing this. I'm sure he'll be better at certain procedures than me and vice versa. Plus we should both hopefully do pretty well financially, although I would love to double his salary!

Agreed. Honestly, any and all credibility hanky had was immediately thrown away when he described a PM&S residency like so:

-"Their residency is in essence diabetic foot wash outs and bunionectomies that come through their attending's office."

^ This is 100% false. Plain and simple.

In addition to a bunch of other gems that are axiomatically incorrect:

-"In the state in which I practice podiatrists can't admit patients, they can't do H&Ps, they can't see workers comp, they can't field routine floor calls, they don't take trauma call, they have no privileges to ankle and foot fractures and quite honestly we are left cleaning up what they mess up."

-"Why does it take our podiatrists two and half hours to do simple bimal fractures when we bang these out in 30 minutes?"

-"The people with their head in the sand are the ones who think that their "residency" is in actuality legitimate"

I had a good belly laugh after reading it, for sure.


As for the residency situation, I'm sure current pod students or even residents could chime in but from what I've gathered on the pod boards here, the residency situation will be improving. Just slowly.
 
I want to start by saying that as a current podiatric surgery resident, Pinnacle Health has an exceptional orthopedic department/residents, and having been a patient with OIP myself I've had nothing but exceptional interactions with their department. With that said, I am thoroughly shocked that you would take the time to post such things about our program and podiatry in general.

I feel the need to defend our program from the very "ignorance" that compelled you to post such things in the first place. If only to paint a more accurate picture for potential ortho/podiatry students reading this, it's worth my time.

At our program, the PODs pick up scraps from the ED to fulfill residency requirements. The orthopedics department probably does on average three times as many foot and ankle cases a week as the podiatrists perform. Don't kid yourself...

Don't kid yourself, indeed. If anyone should be commenting about the quality/case volume of each others F/A surgery, it should be ME (since we actually rotate on your service, and are in the OR with your attendings). You do not see our entire case volume, as most of our FA that does not come through the ED are done at surgery centers where you do not operate.

Why does it take our podiatrists two and half hours to do simple bimal fractures when we bang these out in 30 minutes? Experience.

The correct answer as to why our cases typically take longer (2.5 hrs is nonsense, btw, the one we did last week was 45m skin to skin) is that when WE do ankle fractures, it's the RESIDENT operating for most of the case. We never triple scrub, and our attendings are more than qualified so rest assured the patient's "safety" is not in jeopardy.

In the state in which I practice podiatrists can't admit patients, they can't do H&Ps, they can't see workers comp, they can't field routine floor calls, they don't take trauma call, they have no privileges to ankle and foot fractures and quite honestly we are left cleaning up what they mess up.

If that state is PA , then you should know we do all of the above at Pinnacle.

Although it seems you have a lot of insecurities and are GROSSLY misinformed about our profession, I hope you will educate yourself rather than spread the same level of ignorance that fueled your post.

Best,
GSR
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
There is no fundamental law of economics that states "more education equals more salary." I wish there was, but there isn't. Heck, an "adolescent medicine" physician who spends six years in residency/fellowship probably earns less than a number of nurses at her hospital. Let alone the 12 year old actress who earns more in a month than most surgeons earn in a year.

You are worth what the market is willing to pay you. Even when pay was determined on a supposedly "logical" basis in the Communist countries, physicians were paid less than factory workers.
 
The 'new' podiatrists are surgeons so I am not sure why they should not be paid as such. I work with these guys/gals in the OR and they are VERY good at what they do. Heck... They should get paid more IMO.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
The 'new' podiatrists are surgeons so I am not sure why they should not be paid as such. I work with these guys/gals in the OR and they are VERY good at what they do. Heck... They should get paid more IMO.
Now that's the truth
 
Marketing and filling a need for a lower price than competitors.
 
Top