What's the reason that people do so well in Post Bacc programs when they didnt do as well (as they wanted) in Undergrad. Did some of you guys who got 2.sumthin or low-mid 3.sumthin not do too well in undergrad science b/c you had trouble in science or is it b/c maybe you understand science relatively well but maybe you procrastinated or something?
I ask because I am not that great in science but I really want to be a dentist. Im considering to apply to Academic Enhancer Post Bacc.(ie Barry Univ or UMNJ). I think my weakness is in labs. If I dont have a good partner to help me in labs I would probably fail. Do people get really good grades in Post Bacc b/c the instructors do a really great job of helping you and make you understand the courses even when you are not so great in science?
What makes the learning and/or teaching methods in Post Bacc different from Undergrad that have so many doing so well in Post Bacc (as opposed to how they did in undergrad??)
Appreciate any help!Thank You!
I ask because I am not that great in science but I really want to be a dentist. Im considering to apply to Academic Enhancer Post Bacc.(ie Barry Univ or UMNJ). I think my weakness is in labs. If I dont have a good partner to help me in labs I would probably fail. Do people get really good grades in Post Bacc b/c the instructors do a really great job of helping you and make you understand the courses even when you are not so great in science?
What makes the learning and/or teaching methods in Post Bacc different from Undergrad that have so many doing so well in Post Bacc (as opposed to how they did in undergrad??)
Appreciate any help!Thank You!