DOWannaBe,
The curriculum at a DO school is essentially the same curriculum as an MD school, with the added component of OMM/OPP, so I don't see how you can make the assessment that the DO curriculum is any harder than the MD curriculum. You can say that, well, we DOs have to learn OMM/OPP, but from other threads, it seems that many schools don't even emphasize OMM/OPP all that much. So what's the "big burden?"
MD schools also have "clinical courses" and "doctor-patient"-type courses, so that's not an exclusively DO thing. I'm saying all of this to get the message across that the curricula really share more similarities than differences.
That's COMLEX, not COMPLEX. You must study for the two exams because they're entirely different, and according to "First Aid for the USMLE Step 1," use different language. COMLEX uses more osteopathic terms and USMLE uses more standard terms. Not all DO students take both COMLEX and USMLE; that's more a personal choice. Why do you feel the need to take both if the DO curriculum is supposedly more difficult? Won't residency directors be impressed by the mere fact that your curriculum is more difficult, and thus no matter how you do on the USMLE, you'll be a far superior candidate?
But that's exactly it. Residency directors all feel that the curricula are essentially the same. You guys learn OMM/OPP. That's great, but it doesn't necessarily make it harder.
Alternative Medicine isn't for everyone. I happen to like OMM/OPP, but I'm not in an osteopathic school. I don't consider myself at a loss, however, since there are plenty of programs out there that train MDs, DMDs, DDSs, and other health professionals OMM (particularly at MSU-COM). So if I choose to learn some OMM/OPP, I'll learn it later in life after I graduate from medical school.
MD schools generally touch on the topic of alternative medicine, but don't go into much detail. Despite what you may think, not everything "alternative" is great. I happen to think that many forms of alternative medicine are a crock of $hit, but I think many other forms have their merits.
Entrance standards: Oy vey. A few private and public MD schools report lower accepted GPAs and lower average MCATs than maybe one or two DO schools in this country. Since when do we use numbers to indicate diffiuclty of entrance? I thought the entire argument from the osteopathic side was that numbers don't judge how competent a physician can eventually be, and yet here you are, an osteopathic student making that same correlation. I happen to think numbers MUST make a part of a physician (we need standards -- let's face it), and the rest of it is all that unquantifiable stuff.
You sound like that dude who used to post here by the name of "dragonking" or something. You two seem to have the same viewpoints. Just curious.
Tim of New York City.