I'm sure everyone here has had a patient that needs therapy but needs a little bit more convincing. They believe that because they run, go to the gym, etc that they do not need physical therapy.
I have my spiel but I wanted to ask what your one-liner is for patients.
Essentially..."why should I do physical therapy when I can go to the gym or work with my personal trainer?"
Wow, Fozzy. Are you sorry you asked?
If the patient is currently a runner, gym go-er, pilates person, etc., I usually ask them something like "If all it took to resolve low back pain was running, pilates, a gym membership(insert the patient's perferred activity here), then why have you come to see me (or a doctor, chiropractor, etc)? If your running was a panacea, you probably wouldn't have needed anyone's help in the first place.
But, I think that this type of thing occurs if the patient has a misunderstanding of what physical therapy is, or at least how I think it should be practiced. In the rare instances this has occurred in my practice, usually the patient has one or several of the following perceptions:
A) PT is like personal training, meaning that the physical therapist will just run me through a barrage of exercises, or
B)PT is a painful process, and they can't see how undergoing more pain is going to make their current condition better, or
C) The patietn has had PT before, and found it ineffective for whatever they were being treated for.