I don't see this suggestion in your previous posts. Rather, you state:
I see no mention of third-party payors.
Also, why do you assume that the population will be primarily geriatric. I have yet to practice in an outpatient ortho clinic where Medicare outnumbers private insurance.
And in regards to your latest post, which is in quotes at the start of this post, why is the DPT any type of checks and balances? We have minimal if any data that suggests the product a DPT program puts out differs in any real meaningful way from a Master's program. We however, do have data that early access to any PT leads to fewer lumbar surgeries and greater function in the Medicare population. Additionally we have data that indicates that board certified clinicians (OCS, SCS) practice more efficiently (achieve their outcomes in fewer visits). I could go on and on.
I am in favor of Vision 2020. I think that a clinical doctoral degree is the way the profession should head. I just disagree with how it is implimented. The DPT continues to make graduates general practitioners of physical therapy, rather than content experts in specific areas of PT. A better model would be areas of concentration within the curriculum, so a recent DPT graduate with musculoskeletal concentration would be prepared to deleiver higher quality of care than the typical general DPT or Master's level graduate. This may exist in a few programs, but they are in a severe minority if they exist at all.
The APTA is at odds with itself. It has previously declared board certified therapists as experts in their chosen areas of concentration. If that's true (and I beleive that it is) who better than them to deliver point-of-contact care? A recent general practioner DPT graduate? Are you serious? It makes no sense.