Originally posted by WuzUpDoc
ok, so i called ucla this morning, and once again, the unfairness and randomness of this whole process was made abundantly apparent......
i have been complete at ucla since 8/29/03... the nice lady on the phone informed me that i did not go to committee until early november, when i was put on hold for a month. isince it has been a month since then, my file is in the hands of the reviewer as we speak, and they are not given a deadline for returning it... so most likely i will not hear back until january she said, when i will get a letter informing me of my status (interview, hold, reject...).
so i asked her if it was normal to be complete so long before actually being reviewed and she said the screening process was completely RANDOM. they have around 5500 apps this year and RANDOMLY pick applications to review. this pisses me off cuz i was complete pretty early! the only thing that can make me feel even a tiny bit better is that she said that timing doesn't really matter until after january when the admissions process becomes rolling.
i also asked if i should send more letters or updates or whatever, and she said that since my file was physically out of the office, there really wouldn't be a point until january when it is expected to come back.... so my next point is... what if the dude/dudette who has my file loses it or forgets about it---how can they let the reviewers keep them for so long?!?! argh!!! this process sucks soooooo hard!!!!