Trial comparing TACE to systemic chemo

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

davidjones

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2011
Messages
116
Reaction score
3
http://www.asco.org/ASCOv2/Meetings/Abstracts?&vmview=abst_detail_view&confID=115&abstractID=88405

Summary: Conclusions: D increased the 30-Months MS difference of 20% compared to CT. D improved responses, Performance Status and reduced costs. D reported higher immediate toxicity, mainly fever and abdominal pain, than CT. Late toxicity, mainly haematological, diarrhoea, asthenia and alopecia, was more common in CT. We conclude that D compared to CT increases survival and palliative results in patients with LM from CRC.

Plus it's over 3x cheaper

Members don't see this ad.
 
This is very interesting. Curious what the systemic agents were. Was it folfox/folfiri/avastin etc?

This could truly change the way we treat this large population.
 
FOLFIRI= folate, irinocetan and. 5FU, sometimes used with cetuximab
 
Also it's much more convenient for the patient with only an average of 2 treatments for TACE vs an average of 7 for chemo
 
Last edited:
Top