Mmhmm sure. You're using this student's unfortunate stupidity just to have a "gotcha" moment with slice of bread. It's tactless, and it's the reason people don't like administrators in the first place. You're hypocrites.
And a condescending post by someone self labeling as oh-so-mature seems inevitable response to my comment. If you're offended by someone quoting the Chapelle show, it's you who are the problem in society.
I don't care. I was saying it's not a matter of who's right v who's wrong.
It's really the whole "desecration of human remains" thing that most people are hung up on, not the skit bits. That's really not a SJW position, that's more of a "as a society, most people are highly offended at people playing around with parts of someone that was a father, brother, son, friend, husband, etc" thing.
I still can't wrap my mind around that part... I think OP is a troll.
Yeah, there were actually very strict laws in my state about it. All cadavers had a very specific and strict deidentification protocol, no parts were to leave the lab, no pictures were to be taken, etc. We were very specifically warned that removal of human remains was not merely grounds for dismissal, but illegal, care of the very strict rules the state has for the handling the donation, disposal, and use of human remains. Other violations were merely grounds for dismissal.
OP was looking for trouble then... He might have gotten a pass if his peers were only male. I know people will disagree with that statement, but it's true. Doing something egregious like that in the company of female medical students is beyond stupid.
I understand, but we also can't live in a society where we treat everything black and white. There is a huge gray zone between say holding up a head and say spitting on a cadaver. This is why I agree that he should be talked to, but the idea of an expulsion is like these high schoolers that get kicked out for drugs when they had tylenol in their backpack.
Schools take anatomy cadavers seriously. You may not personally agree with the extent of punishment, but I'm sure professionalism in the anatomy lab was discussed extensively. His classmate sounds like a real tool though.
What I'm betting is that this is one of those "last straw" sort of things. OP has a history of acting unprofessionally and has had issues in the past that nearly got him in serious trouble. His classmate was probably just fed up with his **** and finally decided to let someone in administration know that his prior behavior has not improved.
I know it is taken very seriously, which is why he should be talked to, but you don't think that the punishment should fit the crime? Unless there's a history with this guy, everyone deserved some kind of second chance if the offense isn't egregious enough to merit expulsion.
Yea, I guess that's for the school to decide. The people responding for him to get kicked out aren't his school, so it really doesn't matter what they think. My school wouldn't let a student go for this, but we're a smaller group, and our Dean would police things quietly.
Just saw this post. If he really has a history of being unprofessional and has been warned, then yes, his action requires some form of punishment at this point. Depending on the extent of his previous shenanigans, it may or may not merit expulsion. If he can't understand to back off when he's on thin ice, he does become a real liability.
Because I think most of us have had the experience of women overreacting to nothing. It may not be this (to you), but you have seen it happen some time. I have never seen a male act in ways I've seen females do. This is why my best advice is that in professional settings you always keep women at arms length minimum.
Damn, you have no chill. I've seen men get offended over the smallest of things and even resorting to violence. It happens all the time.
Maybe we live in different worlds, but I have never experienced a man get offended over some trivial thing at work/school and then feel this need to tell on you to the boss/teacher and anyone willing to listen. Then they hold it against you for the rest of their life. A man may get pissed over something stupid and may even try to punch you in the face, but I rather deal with that than the drama instigated by women.
Since this is an episode of Fun With Anecdotes ... my friend group recently kicked out a guy who spread rumors, started drama and got dramatically offended at weird little things like being asked to go downstairs when he was being loud. Silly, immature and drama oriented behavior isn't a "woman thing" or whatever you think.
If this were a bet, I'd put my odds that it is far more likely for a woman to act this way than a man. Your argument is like saying its as easy for blacks to be president as whites because Obama is president.
Your's is the exact same. Trying to make one anecdotal argument superior to another because you say something clever doesn't actually work.
Nanosecond checkin in here.
You pimp, you.
What a strange thing to think
Whatever.
This characterization of people who stand up for women online is telling ...
What can a cadaver do to defend itself?
Desecrating a cadaver is not trivial.
Women are not evil but are more easily offended. Holding a head up is not desecration. If it were spitting or mutilating, we'd agree.
