- Joined
- Jan 10, 2010
- Messages
- 2,694
- Reaction score
- 3,685
We don't know that we've never seen a coronavirus or other respiratory virus like this. Assuming you mean one with a similar virulence, transmissibility, and bad outcomes. We just happen to live in a time with readily available global transportation, a much older average age, the ability to support ones physiology to a much greater degree in a hospital setting, and higher prevalence of comornidities such as obesity and diabetes. We've certainly seen pandemics caused by respiratory viruses and likely endured countless mutations of the more common ones. Long covid is being pitched as affecting all ages at this point. Certainly the immune response varies in the very young vs the very old but mostly quite similar in between. Are you suggesting that age-dependent immune response predisposes to autoantibody formation or specific sensitized T cells? If long covid were immune-mediated, it shouldn't be very good at hiding from screening tests that readily pick up on the kind of damage that results from that (ie inflammatory markers, end organ damage, etc.). When looking to immune-mediated pathology, it's usually apparent if there is an auto-immune, auto-inflammatory, or immuno deficiency at play. It's not always easy to diagnose exactly what it is but it's usually apparent that something objective is going on.
For the purposes of this discussion, I am under the impression that we are not limiting long covid to those who were severely ill and admitted to the hospital or suffered end organ damage. I completely agree that these folks are likely to have a prolonged recovery and possible chronic sequelae. Not sure if its long covid or post-hospital deconditioning/myopathy/neuropathy or just end organ damage or whatever. Either way, that cohort fully deserves a more extensive workup. No argument from me there. I thought we were talking about long covid as some sort of post viral syndrome that affects a wide age range and those that even had mild illnesses -- that's where I have strong doubts that anything significant exists that is not essentially supratentorial.
Once again, if mild COVID is just another respiratory virus that is quick on and quick off, why are multiple papers showing persistent physiologic changes in even mild cases?
Why is there a persistent significantly increased risk of DVT/PE (less then hospitalized or critical COVID patients, but still significantly elevated)?
Risks of deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and bleeding after covid-19: nationwide self-controlled cases series and matched cohort study
Objective To quantify the risk of deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and bleeding after covid-19. Design Self-controlled case series and matched cohort study. Setting National registries in Sweden. Participants 1 057 174 people who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 between 1 February 2020...
www.bmj.com
Why are there significant changes in CNS architecture that persists after mild COVID?
SARS-CoV-2 is associated with changes in brain structure in UK Biobank - Nature
After infection with SARS-CoV-2, individuals show a greater reduction in grey matter thickness and tissue contrast in the orbitofrontal cortex and parahippocampal gyrus; greater changes in markers of tissue damage in regions that are functionally connected to the primary olfactory cortex; and a...
www.nature.com
The point is again, just because we don't understand the how or why of long COVID doesn't mean there isn't some meat on that bone, and the lack of a clearly defined scientific mechanism at this point is more or less meaningless.