The 75 %ile rad onc salary I saw in 2010 is now the 90 %ile as of 2018. U.S. rad onc spending is flat-to-mild-decreased over the last 5y with no indications it will suddenly upswing (ie no sudden increase in rad onc demand, no sudden appearance of new lucrative rad onc codes, etc.) to "feed" ever-growing numbers of new rad onc MD mouths. Leaves one a bit wistful because the
best and highest number I've seen of annual XRT patients is ~1 million which evenly divided by ~5000 rad oncs is 200 XRT patients per rad onc annually—I know personally I could see 400 a year. I don't now, but I have. And if we all had that level of "busy-ness" we'd need half the number of rad oncs. If you use the maybe "more in touch with reality" number of about
~550K new XRT patients this year, it's an even more stark realization: there just aren't enough new XRT patients to go around, nationally, for all the new rad oncs. (Especially if cancer incidence continues its drop, rad onc utilization continues its drop, hypofractionation gets more "penetrance," etc.) So it's not "hard to predict long-term salaries" per se. It's only hard to predict whether rad oncs are making equal, or more, now versus what they will in 10 years (
of course maybe that's just modern American life).
True. Now that you mention it, I think it's probably 2018 since I last saw a MM patient. (Obviously wouldn't be a big loss of XRT business for anybody but still.)