long dong, is there a point in doing case reports anymore? i hear that they dont really care about them any more and that basic sci research is better?
whats ur view on review articles and book chapters?
how many research projects are necessary? if i am already involved in research at my home program, do u think i should try to be involved at other programs too in order to meet ppl after i am done with my present project?
1. Yes
2. I hear the same thing on the other board, but I know people who matched and all they had where case reports and average for derm board scores. So I'd assume some pubs (even case reports) are better then none, since 80% of applicants well have pubs. Seems that on the dermboard most think basic sci>clinical studies>reviews/case reports.
3. Like I said anything published is better then nothing. When I applied all I had where 2 review article submissions, eventually published after the match though. It gave me something to talk about during interviews. As for book chapters, that stuff has always impressed me, but on the other board posters seem to be cynical about how much a student can actually do.
4. At least one would be good since 90% of applicants well have one project. The more the marrier, but don't over do it an let your clinical grades suffer.
5. If you finish your current project at home program, sure go ahead start some others. Again don't let your 3rd year grades/evals suffer though.
Yeah I was wondering that too...do case reports and reviews mean much?
I think they still mean something, but I guess most know that the time commitment isn't as great as original research, so are seen as less impressive. Again I think just publishing is good, cuz so many applicants well have it, and those that don't well seem to be lacking on their application. And having published lets programs know you've done it before and can do it again when u are their resident without much hand holding.
