- Joined
- Jun 27, 2013
- Messages
- 294
- Reaction score
- 258
Not talking about the practice of allowing or disallowing patients who are vaccinated into your practice. I'm talking about physicians who regularly advice their patients not to vaccinate.
Honestly I'd say anti vaxxers in general probably have a bimodal distribution of political beliefs. Lots of HuffPo and Breitbart fans, not a lot of WaPo or WSJ fans.I bet these docs have don't tread on me plates
As the med board acts as de facto govt control, I’m really against the proposalI guess my argument would be let's say when kids come in with septic shock, and you regularly advise herbal tea and advise against fluids and antibiotics, even if the kids don't end up dying, you'd lose your license eventually right? There is a certain level of standard of care that we all need to follow.....
As the med board acts as de facto govt control, I’m really against the proposal
Honestly I'd say anti vaxxers in general probably have a bimodal distribution of political beliefs. Lots of HuffPo and Breitbart fans, not a lot of WaPo or WSJ fans.
In other words, they're the nuts on both sides.
Well, not doing something when someone is ill is a different legal argument than doing something when someone is not ill yet.I guess my argument would be let's say when kids come in with septic shock, and you regularly advise herbal tea and advise against fluids and antibiotics, even if the kids don't end up dying, you'd lose your license eventually right? There is a certain level of standard of care that we all need to follow.....