Yes it is the parents.
UMass >>> Tufts/NEMC in my opinion. UMass has a decent volume, the program is hampered a bit by being spread out over two hospitals. The residents are generally pretty good, in the past few years they have had a lot of FMGs. The best part about the program is the attending staff. There are two populations - a group of older, veteran pathologists who have been there for quite some time and are experts in their fields and very calm. The other group is made up of younger folks, many who trained in Boston but seem to be happy where they are now. They are a little more intense and aggressive. But all are friendly, and most of them really like teaching, in particular when the resident is highly motivated. I did my PSF there and had a great experience. There are some things you don't see a lot of by going there (don't see tons of bone/soft tissue, don't see a ton of lung path) but this is pretty typical for most medium sized med centers. You do see lots of Gyn-onc, GI, and breast. Another great thing about the program is that the support staff is very nice and easy to get along with, which is one of the things that people often don't consider when looking at programs.
Tufts is ok - a couple of the staff at UMass actually did their residency there. From what i hear the quality of teaching isn't quite as good. Then again, I don't know a ton about it and most of what i have heard is hearsay. Any specific questions about UMass feel free to pm me or ask here. Gotta run now.