- Joined
- Sep 8, 2019
- Messages
- 296
- Reaction score
- 736
Will anyone be changing the way they word products of conception or ectopic pregnancy cases to avoid unfair legal implications for patients? I report the presence or absence of chorionic villi, but I don’t know the whole clinical story behind these and would prefer more standard neutral terminology. Does anyone have suggestions for wording? If not, I will sign as benign uterine contents or negative for malignancy, as unhelpful as those may be. Appreciate any insight.
Last edited: