Just curious about the difference between pathology training in the states and other countries and whether anyone has any opinion about that.
From what I understand the training in the states is divided into anatomical pathology or clinical pathology. Doing AP or CP only requires 3 years while doing combined AP and CP requires 4 years. But that's all I know.
Comparatively, in my country pathology training is divided into AP and CP as well. However, each require 5 years separately. Combined AP and CP is called general pathology and requires 5 years as well. Furthermore, CP is generally sub-divided into chemical, genetics, haematology, microbiology and immunopathology. Of course there is also forensics pathology. In addition, chemical, microbiology and haematology are generally done as joint-fellowships with the college of physicians (endocrine, infectious disease and haematology respectively).
I am not seeking information because I want to train in the states or anything. I guess I am more curious about whether people think that 3 years of AP or CP (or 4 years of combined) is really "enough". I understand of course that this loose definition of "enough" is going to depend on many factors such as personal dedication, quality of teaching etc.
From what I understand the training in the states is divided into anatomical pathology or clinical pathology. Doing AP or CP only requires 3 years while doing combined AP and CP requires 4 years. But that's all I know.
Comparatively, in my country pathology training is divided into AP and CP as well. However, each require 5 years separately. Combined AP and CP is called general pathology and requires 5 years as well. Furthermore, CP is generally sub-divided into chemical, genetics, haematology, microbiology and immunopathology. Of course there is also forensics pathology. In addition, chemical, microbiology and haematology are generally done as joint-fellowships with the college of physicians (endocrine, infectious disease and haematology respectively).
I am not seeking information because I want to train in the states or anything. I guess I am more curious about whether people think that 3 years of AP or CP (or 4 years of combined) is really "enough". I understand of course that this loose definition of "enough" is going to depend on many factors such as personal dedication, quality of teaching etc.