Pathologist overworked and burntout?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

pathres9999

Full Member
2+ Year Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2019
Messages
32
Reaction score
73
I came across this article:

I kind of wonder if this is truly real. It seems to be another call that "we are short of pathologists, please believe us this time." I believe the only true metric is to look at salary and competitiveness to assess job need. I think if there is burnout it is due to lack of respect and the fact we get so poorly compensated.

Members don't see this ad.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
I came across this article:

I kind of wonder if this is truly real. It seems to be another call that "we are short of pathologists, please believe us this time." I believe the only true metric is to look at salary and competitiveness to assess job need. I think if there is burnout it is due to lack of respect and the fact we get so poorly compensated.
Although I am not burned out, I talked with a pathologist at a large corporate lab who said there aren’t enough pathologists where this individual is currently working at. Also, this person’s previous job was also understaffed.

I certainly could care less what other docs think of me. If youre good youre good. If they don’t respect you because you’re a pathologist, then that’s their problem not mine.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
There's probably two factors at work. I think there's a deliberate understaffing because every year for the past 10 years we've had overall CMS cuts to pathology services - so no fiscally responsible group wants to take on an FTE unless they really really have to. Add to that a diminished pool of qualified candidates. I say qualified because if it were just a matter of stuffing bodies into the meat grinder, we wouldn't have understaffed practices. Finding a pathologist who can actually do the work without having to be handheld for the first year out of training is becoming increasingly difficult as both the quality of training programs and applicant pool deteriorate.

But on a different note, maybe there is something to the so-called shortage because just today I got an unsolicited locums email for a gig with no call, 8-5, 20 cases total, no frozen coverage, and all travel and accommodations paid for including flight. That was unheard of even 5 years ago in my area.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6 users
Members don't see this ad :)
There's probably two factors at work. I think there's a deliberate understaffing because every year for the past 10 years we've had overall CMS cuts to pathology services - so no fiscally responsible group wants to take on an FTE unless they really really have to. Add to that a diminished pool of qualified candidates. I say qualified because if it were just a matter of stuffing bodies into the meat grinder, we wouldn't have understaffed practices. Finding a pathologist who can actually do the work without having to be handheld for the first year out of training is becoming increasingly difficult as both the quality of training programs and applicant pool deteriorate.

But on a different note, maybe there is something to the so-called shortage because just today I got an unsolicited locums email for a gig with no call, 8-5, 20 cases total, no frozen coverage, and all travel and accommodations paid for including flight. That was unheard of even 5 years ago in my area.
That locums job should be the norm in a good job market.

I get the feeling most graduates aren’t prepared to practice general pathology and couldn’t function in some groups practicing general pathology. Glaring weaknesses in surgpath, cyto or heme. These weaknesses are amplified in busy practices where you have to be efficient and quick.

I remember one attending (Professor btw) from MD Anderson who mentioned on Twitter that most residents aren’t prepared for independent signout following graduation from residency due to “residency being broken up so much” and that a minimum of a one year fellowship in surgpath or subspecialty is required. She went on to say that the quality of the trainees who come to do a surgpath fellowship depends on where they did their residency and that some people are “woefully unprepared”. She went on to say that the trainees are taken aback by the amount of info that is thrown their way.

She really made a good point that we need strong diagnosticians in Pathology and without that, “the wheels just fall off the bus.”

I know of some residencies who wouldn’t even recommend their graduates for fellowship. Some won’t even take on their graduates for a job opening as well.

I get this feeling that since the bar is set low in Pathology, a lot of weaker candidates get in and then get shunted out into the workforce. Attendings at surgpath fellowship programs see these graduates and can really attest to the quality of training programs nowadays.

Seems like the focus is on quantity and not quality.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Give them a slide test. I’m not asking for them to be Juan Rosai, I just want to know if they can approach cases with common sense and recognize normal duodenum mucosa. Hopefully they’ll reveal themselves if they are hacks or mentally unstable.

We’ve had the biggest issue with job hoppers. 5 jobs in two years is not “experience”, even in the COVID era, at least not the kind of “experience” you want.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
I think most pathologists should now learn to stop complaining about the quality of the graduates. You reap what you sow after all, and unfortunately this is the price you pay for middling to poor education. At this point, feel heaven blessed that someone can even read a slide, because remember they likely are self-taught so its impressive they would have came as far as they did.

I don't think anymore fellowship is required. You get what you get. Fellowship is meant for specialization not to finally learn how to be a pathologist.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 users
I think most pathologists should now learn to stop complaining about the quality of the graduates. You reap what you sow after all, and unfortunately this is the price you pay for middling to poor education. At this point, feel heaven blessed that someone can even read a slide, because remember they likely are self-taught so its impressive they would have came as far as they did.

I don't think anymore fellowship is required. You get what you get. Fellowship is meant for specialization not to finally learn how to be a pathologist.
I think still in todays “good” job market people still need at least one fellowship unless you go to a good to great program.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Although I am not burned out, I talked with a pathologist at a large corporate lab who said there aren’t enough pathologists where this individual is currently working at. Also, this person’s previous job was also understaffed.

I certainly could care less what other docs think of me. If youre good youre good. If they don’t respect you because you’re a pathologist, then that’s their problem not mine.

I disagree with your last phrase. Respect matters. Without respect, nobody listens to you.
 
I disagree with your last phrase. Respect matters. Without respect, nobody listens to you.
Respect is earned. If you suck, then of course no one’s going to listen to you. If you are a good pathologist then they will respect you.

Who else are clinicians going to listen to if you are in a hospital and you are the only pathologist who can give them an answer?

If clinicians don’t respect you because of your field, then that’s their problem. You aren’t going to please everyone in life.

All they need is an accurate diagnoses in a timely manner. If you can’t provide them with one, then of course they aren’t going to respect you.

I’ve never felt like clinicians disrespected me. They are always appreciative when I give them a call, give them a diagnosis and talk about their case.

Do clinicians show you no respect where you work?

I mean I’ve been around good experienced pathologists who clinicians actually talk highly of during tumor boards. So like I said, if you are good then people will respect you.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Respect is earned. If you suck, then of course no one’s going to listen to you. If you are a good pathologist then they will respect you.

Who else are clinicians going to listen to if you are in a hospital and you are the only pathologist who can give them an answer?

If clinicians don’t respect you because of your field, then that’s their problem. You aren’t going to please everyone in life.

All they need is an accurate diagnoses in a timely manner. If you can’t provide them with one, then of course they aren’t going to respect you.

I’ve never felt like clinicians disrespected me. They are always appreciative when I give them a call, give them a diagnosis and talk about their case.

Do clinicians show you no respect where you work?

I mean I’ve been around good experienced pathologists who clinicians actually talk highly of during tumor boards. So like I said, if you are good then people will respect you.

You provide good points.

In a perfect world, respect is earned.

Unfortunately, I have witnessed other physician specialists and administrators treat pathologists as servants rather than as colleagues or respectable professionals, merely because the institutional culture was that of pathologists being low on the totem pole. These were good pathologists too. I think this conduct is quite common at many places.

As a profession, pathology has in my opinion been far too laissez-faire in resident recruitment, which gives the impression that anyone can do it. This reduces the overall respect of the field.
 
I think feeling over worked is more of a thing with AP only - Ologists who push mountains of glass. This can be very physically demanding and can break your body down - including neck / back pain, eye problems (extreme myopia, glaucoma), upper extremity issues from steering glass, etc.

Imo Very important for you youngsters to find a career in the lab that is more than AP. I know some here disagree (no disrespect Dave - but I couldn’t do what you do).

/r respect of our field- agree with keratin. If you deserve respect you’ll get it. A good path is rare these days and invaluable (even if underpaid!!). My MD colleagues and non MD healthcare leader types have always been respectful in my experience. But I’ve always worked hard and been a team player.

/r do we have enough paths. Just think about all the waste in medicine. We still over screen, over scope, over biopsy (derms are you listening), over ordering blood tests, over doing most everything really. We are not in need of more paths - most of them aren’t even that busy in spite of above. And don’t get me started on academia. Academic paths can all just work 2 more weeks a year and eliminate the need for hundreds maybe even thousands of paths.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
/r do we have enough paths. Just think about all the waste in medicine. We still over screen, over scope, over biopsy (derms are you listening),

Listening. And agree there are many practices that over-biopsy, especially with the proliferation of midlevels that don’t know what they are looking at.

It’s a product of the fee-for-service system we designed though, and a product of ever-decreasing cuts in reimbursement. No different than pathologists who over-order immunostains.

If CMS was smart they would have designed a system where malignant : benign ratio is part of the pay for performance incentive plans. Instead we got ridiculous crap that just creates a lot of gaming of the system….
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Members don't see this ad :)
Although I am not burned out, I talked with a pathologist at a large corporate lab who said there aren’t enough pathologists where this individual is currently working at. Also, this person’s previous job was also understaffed.

I certainly could care less what other docs think of me. If youre good youre good. If they don’t respect you because you’re a pathologist, then that’s their problem not mine.
I am nowhere near close to being burned out. Great lifestyle if all you're doing is signing out cases and not doing the other stuff. Not being an academic helps. I live in a neighborhood with other docs who constantly complain of burnout. One neighborhood friend constantly tells me, "I wish I was a pathologist". I get to spend lots of time with the kids and family.

It is not uncommon for my work colleagues and I to tell each other that pathology is one of the best kept secrets in medicine. We do see ourselves as lucky as our work setup allows for high compensation to work hour ratio. If you're not on "call" on a certain day, the job allows you to go home when you're done with work or take frequent breaks. I would not trade this for anything. And if I were to do this again, I would either pick the same specialty or maybe a niche clinical specialty with minimal to no call/emergencies and a good payer mix. That being said, the no patient contact and not having to deal with patient portals and such is HUGE.

Many places are understaffed from what I hear. There are two reasons for this. Some labs truly are understaffed. Others are simply inefficient as to the distribution of work. An efficient pathologist is a very happy pathologist.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
I am nowhere near close to being burned out. Great lifestyle if all you're doing is signing out cases and not doing the other stuff. Not being an academic helps. I live in a neighborhood with other docs who constantly complain of burnout. One neighborhood friend constantly tells me, "I wish I was a pathologist". I get to spend lots of time with the kids and family.

It is not uncommon for my work colleagues and I to tell each other that pathology is one of the best kept secrets in medicine. We do see ourselves as lucky as our work setup allows for high compensation to work hour ratio. If you're not on "call" on a certain day, the job allows you to go home when you're done with work or take frequent breaks. I would not trade this for anything. And if I were to do this again, I would either pick the same specialty or maybe a niche clinical specialty with minimal to no call/emergencies and a good payer mix. That being said, the no patient contact and not having to deal with patient portals and such is HUGE.

Many places are understaffed from what I hear. There are two reasons for this. Some labs truly are understaffed. Others are simply inefficient as to the distribution of work. An efficient pathologist is a very happy pathologist.
The word has gotten out to foreign grads that you can make good money in pathology with a good lifestyle so more and more are applying (much more so in recent years since the job market has gotten better). I see Pathology getting more competitive because of this (better job market).

10 years ago there were no jobs and locums rates were garbage. How time has changed. Starting salaries seem to have been going up.

I now realize I was being low balled afterall when I applied a few years ago with starting salaries in the 180-200,000 area. Basically lower pay for me meant more money for greedy partners. One of these jobs was at a busy tertiary care hospital too. That really sucked now looking back.

I remember mentioning this and people here on SDN were in denial that the job market sucked or were calling us complainers. Well at least it’s better now for younger grads. I’m happy to see that. I hate to see younger grads get exploited because of a high supply/low demand job market.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
The word has gotten out to foreign grads that you can make good money in pathology with a good lifestyle so more and more are applying (much more so in recent years since the job market has gotten better). I see Pathology getting more competitive because of this (better job market).

10 years ago there were no jobs and locums rates were garbage. How time has changed. Starting salaries seem to have been going up.

I now realize I was being low balled afterall when I applied a few years ago with starting salaries in the 180-200,000 area. Basically lower pay for me meant more money for greedy partners. One of these jobs was at a busy tertiary care hospital too. That really sucked now looking back.

I remember mentioning this and people here on SDN were in denial that the job market sucked or were calling us complainers. Well at least it’s better now for younger grads. I’m happy to see that. I hate to see younger grads get exploited because of a high supply/low demand job market.
I remember those days. You've been around for a while; my recollection is that you were not one of the most vocal folks in that regard. Calling out what it is is fine. Incessant bitching is difficult to take as seriously. There is a balance.

Regarding your starting salaries in private practice...180-200K...for real? I expected more. Academic starting salaries suck this bad and worse.

Regarding your comment about foreign grads, I think the flux of foreign medical grads into pathology has always been there and relatively steady. That "word" has been out there for quite some time; consequently, there are pathologists and clinicians from other countries who are willing to take USMLEs and completely re-do residency training in the US medical system to pursue a career in pathology in the USA. I have spoken to several of these folks and I assure you they are NOT looking back and have no regrets. Much better pay. Good lifestyle. This is one way of "leveling up". Once that happens, there are other ways to "level up" (investing/diversification/alternate revenue streams). You go parabolic, you win.

Now we are in an interesting age of The Great Resignation whatever that means. Should be interesting how the field of pathology changes in the next 5-10 years in this age especially as there are multiple intersecting changes (digital pathology, AI, further reimbursement changes, amalgamation of health systems both academic and private, etc). Current state of health care is not sustainable IMO. Make as much money now in case **** hits the fan later.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
I remember those days. You've been around for a while; my recollection is that you were not one of the most vocal folks in that regard. Calling out what it is is fine. Incessant bitching is difficult to take as seriously. There is a balance.

Regarding your starting salaries in private practice...180-200K...for real? I expected more. Academic starting salaries suck this bad and worse.

Regarding your comment about foreign grads, I think the flux of foreign medical grads into pathology has always been there and relatively steady. That "word" has been out there for quite some time; consequently, there are pathologists and clinicians from other countries who are willing to take USMLEs and completely re-do residency training in the US medical system to pursue a career in pathology in the USA. I have spoken to several of these folks and I assure you they are NOT looking back and have no regrets. Much better pay. Good lifestyle. This is one way of "leveling up". Once that happens, there are other ways to "level up" (investing/diversification/alternate revenue streams). You go parabolic, you win.

Now we are in an interesting age of The Great Resignation whatever that means. Should be interesting how the field of pathology changes in the next 5-10 years in this age especially as there are multiple intersecting changes (digital pathology, AI, further reimbursement changes, amalgamation of health systems both academic and private, etc). Current state of health care is not sustainable IMO. Make as much money now in case **** hits the fan later.
Most foreign grads want to come to the USA and redo their training (not only Pathology but every field) because one, higher average pay and two, better opportunities in the US for their children. Believe it or not, but USA is still considered a “dream” for most foreigners now like it was for immigrants who came to the US in the 60s and 70s. They are willing to redo a residency for the aforementioned reasons. If pay or lifestyle here wasn’t great, most probably wouldn’t go through the grueling task of taking the USMLEs and redoing residency all over again, to get a job similar or worse than in their home countries. Foreigners, especially doctors, want their kids to be educated here in the US. Also, being considered an “American trained doctor” is considered prestigious in their home countries.

Pay here on average is much better than in their countries. I do know pay for docs in a SE Asian country can be good for private docs but American docs get paid on average better. Academic pay in some countries are like less than $50,000 a year in Asian countries. I know a surgeon in another country making $350,000 a year but working long hours 6 days a week. He once was on call in a rural area of the country getting paid like $10 an hour for being on call!!!!

I mean if you could come to the US to make as much or much more and provide a better life for your kids, wouldn’t you?

Yes 180-200k was for real. I talked with 4-5 groups whose starting pay was in that range. I can post a text from a president of a group I interviewed with offering 200k starting, which was two years ago. Incyte (big corporate lab in NW) offered me 200k as well. I see people getting offered 300+ now and I’m wondering to myself maybe it’s just my bad luck. Where are these jobs?

No, my name isn’t Thrombus nor is it drifter but I had few job opportunities where I wanted to live. Luckily I got a job. Not a great one but also low pay but then again low volume. No bitching here but I felt the effects of the “oversupply” much talked about here on SDN from starting salaries that were offered to me and employers telling me “they can be picky who they choose.”

I’m happy things have turned around the past few years so that young grads can get paid fairly. Some here have said starting pay is in the 300s now. I hear locums is paying $1500+ a day now. Good for you guys. It wasn’t my experience when I interviewed. Nor was it for my friend who I trained with who told me grads got it much better now then in 2013-15 when he was looking for jobs.

It’s my feeling that there are people who are doing well for themselves, got good salaries and of course do not see those on the other side of the fence who are getting paid low with few job opportunities. I’m looking for job opportunities nearby because I don’t plan on being at my current job forever.

In my opinion, discussing and bringing light to an oversupply of pathologists is fine. I don’t consider it bitching. It explains the low starting salaries, the low locums rates (less than $1000/day), 4-5 years to partnership that many pathologists encountered a few years ago. Like I said, good to see things change. We, as pathologists, have voices and we should make our voices heard (which shouldn’t be confused with bitching).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Agree with you on all points…summed it up perfectly! Commenting on oversupply was truth and I don’t consider that bitching either. That’s just calling a spade a spade.

Didn’t know Incyte paid so low…that salary is not great. I’m familiar with some of the Washington state practices (Cellnetix for example) and thought they paid better. In any case, seems like things have changed since a decade ago and hopefully for the better. Wish you the best of luck in finding a better opportunity.

Vaguely remember the name Thrombus but don’t remember his posts much. Won’t bother searching since I don’t need to get sucked back into this.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Agree with you on all points…summed it up perfectly! Commenting on oversupply was truth and I don’t consider that bitching either. That’s just calling a spade a spade.

Didn’t know Incyte paid so low…that salary is not great. I’m familiar with some of the Washington state practices (Cellnetix for example) and thought they paid better. In any case, seems like things have changed since a decade ago and hopefully for the better. Wish you the best of luck in finding a better opportunity.

Vaguely remember the name Thrombus but don’t remember his posts much. Won’t bother searching since I don’t need to get sucked back into this.
Now that you mention it, the company was Cellnetix not Incyte.
 
I now realize I was being low balled afterall when I applied a few years ago with starting salaries in the 180-200,000 area. Basically lower pay for me meant more money for greedy partners. One of these jobs was at a busy tertiary care hospital too. That really sucked now looking back.

I remember mentioning this and people here on SDN were in denial that the job market sucked or were calling us complainers. Well at least it’s better now for younger grads. I’m happy to see that. I hate to see younger grads get exploited because of a high supply/low demand job market.
I remember about 10 years ago when I was taking my fellowship boards in Tampa, a whole group of us was talking about what jobs we would be taking and starting salaries. The average consensus was $170K-200K. Some of those I was commiserating with told me that the attitude of employers then was take it or leave it because they'll always have someone to work at that salary.

The average starting salary now is about $250K depending on location. While I expect it to go up, I also expect employers/pathology groups to be far more selective as time marches on. With ever-shrinking reimbursement, groups - including mine - are less inclined to hire and just absorb and redistribute work. For some groups, a 1-2% overall reimbursement cut (without offsets elsewhere) results in a six figure drop in revenue and could even be the equivalent of a whole pathologist FTE. So, when we do hire, it has to be someone who can handle a sizeable workload at an efficient pace to justify the increased cost. So yes, pathology groups may be hiring but I think there's a limited number of pathologists who can successfully manage most advertised positions today.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Interesting ^^
Market still very regional paths are still not in a strong position vs employers in my area

180-200k starting salary still happening around me
You can get a really good experienced path for 275-325 K currently

There are very few path owned groups (> 10) that are flourishing in New England unless you go far north & this excludes VT (which is now all UVM). a few small less than 10 person groups are still around but are watching there own hospitals outsource as much path services as possible including selling AP outreach, etc with negative impacts on revenue.

If the larger academic path depts in Boston ever decided to become predatory - ever single small group within a hour radius would be hosed.

Wondering if any recently hired paths by a large multiple speciality medical group received loan repayment as part of package?
Related Q - how many paths work for a mutli speciality group that offer loan repayment to some high demand fields @ initial hire but not other fields (and is path in the group getting loan help or not).
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
At 180K is fairly low IMO now. It was low back in 2004 really.


Everyone new plan: Quiet Quitting. I hear its in fashion at the moment.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
My niece is making over 400,000 in psych fresh out of training, while working from home. 250 in path still sucks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users
250 in path is a reflection of too many subpar programs producing too many subpar graduates.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
At 180K is fairly low IMO now. It was low back in 2004 really.


Everyone new plan: Quiet Quitting. I hear its in fashion at the moment.
I got offered that much at a busy community practice. Hope those greedy partners are actually paying up now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
My niece is making over 400,000 in psych fresh out of training, while working from home. 250 in path still sucks.
Yes 250 still sucks and sucks much more if you are generating a lot more in revenue for someone.
 
That is highly atypical
This is very typical.
Good friend of mine is practicing psych at large midwest urban area - almost 400K + productivity bonus, 90% of work is from home.
Her first job, no bs fellowships.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
This is very typical.
Good friend of mine is practicing psych at large midwest urban area - almost 400K + productivity bonus, 90% of work is from home.
Her first job, no bs fellowships.
They can do cash only practice and do well for themselves.
 
That is highly atypical
I was told in passing of a psychiatrist in my town, fresh out of fellowship (I don't know which psych fellowship honestly), charging upwards of $500/hour cash. The practice is booked out solid.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Psych is where to be right now according to my relative. That field wouldn't be my cup of tea. It's not hard to make up the difference for any underpaid pathologists out there. Get those side hustles going.
 
I have a friend who is a psychiatrist who no longer accepting insurance and bills patient by the hour. And is highly in demand
& killling it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Sure, but how many of us have any interest in being a psychiatrist? I'd rather be a path assistant than do psych. I'm not sure you could ever pay me enough to do psych.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 3 users
If people really are being offered 180,000, it might not be a bad idea to just become a path assistant. How the hell do you even live on that?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Maybe I shoulda gone into psych...do they sound as depressing and miserable in their forum as we do...?

Psych is amongst the least competitive specialties to get into (not that path is much more competitive either) along with FM, IM, Neurology, Peds, and OM/PM. I wonder if reimbursement rate upwards of $500/hr changes this. The competitiveness of specialties in general, directly correlates with compensation. Are they going to start getting more top med school grads/fewer IMG's...?
 
If people really are being offered 180,000, it might not be a bad idea to just become a path assistant. How the hell do you even live on that?
People are able to live on less. Just no fancy cars, eating out all the time and nice vacations.
 
How much an hour do psychs charge nowadays?
The one example I know of has two rates one for adults (higher) and one for peds.
I am not 100% on this but I think his Pedi rate is 350/ hr with a 5 hr retainer / prepaid. I helped a neighbors kid get hooked up with him.
He is no longer taking new patients
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Maybe I shoulda gone into psych...do they sound as depressing and miserable in their forum as we do...?

Psych is amongst the least competitive specialties to get into (not that path is much more competitive either) along with FM, IM, Neurology, Peds, and OM/PM. I wonder if reimbursement rate upwards of $500/hr changes this. The competitiveness of specialties in general, directly correlates with compensation. Are they going to start getting more top med school grads/fewer IMG's...?

I thought psych competitiveness was increasing quite a bit
 
Psych is where to be right now according to my relative. That field wouldn't be my cup of tea. It's not hard to make up the difference for any underpaid pathologists out there. Get those side hustles going.
Side hustle outside my regular path job? I think I might get a heart attack lol pulling those LADoc 80 hour work weeks. I’ll prob end up being one of those burnt out pathologists in the article.
 
I would not recommend anyone anywhere take a job for less than 300k unless it is an "extreme lifestyle position".

And by "extreme lifestyle position" I am referring to group with a sign out area in a strip club in Miami where you work until noon and have bottomless mimosas all day.

Tip of the spear candidates with tier one credentials and 4-5 years of experience should be able to get 500K atm + benefits + 8 weeks off.

T1 credentials would be like: Undergrad Ivy League/Stanford/CalTech/MIT/Hopkins/UChicago/Duke + Med School Ivy League/Stanford/Hopkins/WashU/UChicago/NW/UCSF/Duke/Emory + similar residency + similar level fellowship + 3 BC's.

Im sure I forgot some elite school like CMellonU etc but Im super busy today so forgive me.

PS: Yah and no one in PP cares about your PhD at MIT and post doc at Cold Springs btw, sorry. That might actually work against you.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
I would not recommend anyone anywhere take a job for less than 300k unless it is an "extreme lifestyle position".

And by "extreme lifestyle position" I am referring to group with a sign out area in a strip club in Miami where you work until noon and have bottomless mimosas all day.

Tip of the spear candidates with tier one credentials and 4-5 years of experience should be able to get 500K atm + benefits + 8 weeks off.

T1 credentials would be like: Undergrad Ivy League/Stanford/CalTech/MIT/Hopkins/UChicago/Duke + Med School Ivy League/Stanford/Hopkins/WashU/UChicago/NW/UCSF/Duke/Emory + similar residency + similar level fellowship + 3 BC's.

Im sure I forgot some elite school like CMellonU etc but Im super busy today so forgive me.

PS: Yah and no one in PP cares about your PhD at MIT and post doc at Cold Springs btw, sorry. That might actually work against you.
I agree. But how many T1 candidates do you think there are? And do you think someone is worth at least $300K/year if you, in effect, have to train them ground up on how to be pathologist for 1-2 years because they didn't get that in residency or fellowship?
 
I would not recommend anyone anywhere take a job for less than 300k unless it is an "extreme lifestyle position".

And by "extreme lifestyle position" I am referring to group with a sign out area in a strip club in Miami where you work until noon and have bottomless mimosas all day.

Tip of the spear candidates with tier one credentials and 4-5 years of experience should be able to get 500K atm + benefits + 8 weeks off.

T1 credentials would be like: Undergrad Ivy League/Stanford/CalTech/MIT/Hopkins/UChicago/Duke + Med School Ivy League/Stanford/Hopkins/WashU/UChicago/NW/UCSF/Duke/Emory + similar residency + similar level fellowship + 3 BC's.

Im sure I forgot some elite school like CMellonU etc but Im super busy today so forgive me.

PS: Yah and no one in PP cares about your PhD at MIT and post doc at Cold Springs btw, sorry. That might actually work against you.
No worries, these guys will go to academia and work for 160K/year
 
T1 credentials would be like: Undergrad Ivy League/Stanford/CalTech/MIT/Hopkins/UChicago/Duke
PS: Yah and no one in PP cares about your PhD at MIT and post doc at Cold Springs btw, sorry. That might actually work against you.
No one really cares where you did undergrad either...

If I was hiring, a D-1 college athlete at a SEC/Big10/Pac-12/ACC/Big12 school would go further than someone with a molecular biology degree from Hopkins...
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
No on really cares where you did undergrad either...

If I was hiring, a D-1 college athlete at a SEC/Big10/Pac-12/ACC/Big12 school would go further than someone with a molecular biology degree from Hopkins...
As long as you can do the job well, have a good eye for pathology, efficient, work well with others, hard working and can work independently (of course with necessary consultation from coworkers in your group) you should do fine.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
No on really cares where you did undergrad either...

If I was hiring, a D-1 college athlete at a SEC/Big10/Pac-12/ACC/Big12 school would go further than someone with a molecular biology degree from Hopkins...
Yah that is probably true. I look at undergrad, but its probably not even medical school that matters. Perhaps just the last 2 or so places you trained.

BUT....I have seen people with crazy credentials that are super weirdos, far beyond just eccentric pathologist behavior and that will sabotage everything. Its really sad to see and quite common so that is always the asterisk on every CV.

Its very very hard to rationalize medical school when 22 year olds fresh out of undergrad are pulling down 100k+ doing remote work.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
As long as you can do the job well, have a good eye for pathology, efficient, work well with others, hard working and can work independently (of course with necessary consultation from coworkers in your group) you should do fine.
I think this is more important than anything and that I think people confuse / wrongfully equate going to a prestigious or top institution with automatically having these qualities. But I am sure they eventually figure it out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
CV is not that important.
Hopefully you can spot candidates that are reasonably independent.
This is not something that residency and fellowship teaches these days
 
Top