- Joined
- Jun 23, 2003
- Messages
- 15,455
- Reaction score
- 6,726
They won't even bother to nab a patsy.
Man...you're like 0 for 30 this week. You're not even getting your crazy conspiracy theories correct. Slippin' man...
They won't even bother to nab a patsy.
Apple stocks anyone? Almost -20% YTD. I have never invested in individual stock before but this looks tempting:
https://www.google.com/finance?chdn...AQ:AAPL&ntsp=0&fct=big&ei=Mq9pUcC3LKeviAL18AE
You realize Japan has twice our sovernign debt by GDP and is kicking around fine right?
You realize that the United States with a GDP/debt = 90% is pretty much the same as a pharmacist having $90k in student loans right? Not great but not end of the world right?
Wow! Did we just get our truck bomb in Texas?
Why does my position bother you? I chose to look at the debt in the system and recognize that is why the global economy cannot grow in real terms. Keynesism works when debt levels are low, but when saturation occurs then like Newtonian physics break down near light speed, Keynesism breaks down when the marginal utility of debt turns negative.
The stock market could go to 30k, but gold will go up to meet it at 30,000. The yardstick used to measure markets is being shortened to give paper assets the illusion of appreciation. Gold is the canary, the klaxon, the thermostat. It will be suppressed to give the appearance that debt instruments have value. It's gold versus the USTreasury bond. When debt deflates which would you rather hold? The move of recent is just part of the epic drama that will be this gold megabull market.
You position doesn't "bother" me.
Right now the private sector is deleveraging. This is causing increased public sector borrowing and a public sector deficit. Whereas in the 90's we had private sector borrowing and spending that let to increased tax receipts and government surpluses.
Regardless----- I think you place too much value in a shiny, intristically worthless metal.
They caught the guy. Lets waterboard him and find out if he is working for the federal reserve.
I have to hurry before my next zyprexa dose...this just in
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-04-20/fbi-interviewed-tamerlan-tsarnaev-early-2011-suspects-mother-claims-fbi-set
"... mother also decided to go the conspiracy route, and allege the boys conduct was "set up" and that the FBI had been following them for years."
I've seen a lot of the videos, but none of them where you can see the backpack go off. Who's to say it was actually from the backpack?There's a freaking video of them carrying a backpack in that matched the one that blew up, then leaving after the bomb exploded without the backpacks. Yeah, the FBI set them up...ok.
There's a freaking video of them carrying a backpack in that matched the one that blew up, then leaving after the bomb exploded without the backpacks. Yeah, the FBI set them up...ok.
Image doesn't look doctored at all. Seem perfectly legitimate."The crowd is ignoring the obvious and will miss great opportunity, in our view. Todays negative real interest rates amid one of the most inflationary global monetary regimes on record presents a rare chance to capture significant Alpha if/when the monetary system resets again (which we argue it must)."-- latest from QBAMCO.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-04-21/qbamco-unreserved-credit-growth-and-imperial-constraint
Boston Bomber Last message on Facebook to his Father : I have never done it , they set me up
also what happend to the guy they had on the ground and stripped naked that was all over the live coverage? who was he? a third suspect?
He was the redneck patsy they were trying to set up. He is also pictured with a black backpack near the finish line wearing a blue jacket. Notice how the media dropped the story so quickly and never went back to it? They weren't the least bit curious who that guy was? It's almost laughable how obvious this is. Check out Alex Jones at infowars.com. There were several patsy groups set up near the finish line. This is clearly a false flag event.
Back to something with less tin foil and more akin to the thread title:
I have absolutely no investing experience (or capital at the moment!) but what is wrong with buying and selling stocks under $1? I have heard that it's dangerous and you'll lose big, but I have seen a few stocks fluctuate between 0.30 and 0.60 every single day. Why not buy when it's at the 0.30, sell at 0.60 and repeat ad naseum? It's been months that these ups and downs have occurred, so it seems unlikely you'll buy at 0.30 and it'll tank down to 0.05.
Back to something with less tin foil and more akin to the thread title:
I have absolutely no investing experience (or capital at the moment!) but what is wrong with buying and selling stocks under $1? I have heard that it's dangerous and you'll lose big, but I have seen a few stocks fluctuate between 0.30 and 0.60 every single day. Why not buy when it's at the 0.30, sell at 0.60 and repeat ad naseum? It's been months that these ups and downs have occurred, so it seems unlikely you'll buy at 0.30 and it'll tank down to 0.05.