- Joined
- Aug 20, 2012
- Messages
- 814
- Reaction score
- 231
SDN bias. You should be used to it by now.guess I shouldn't be surprised seeing 270s on steps anymore
SDN bias. You should be used to it by now.guess I shouldn't be surprised seeing 270s on steps anymore
I don't really get the whole "anonymity" concern on this site. It's not like the program director is trolling this website looking to see who matched - they already know...
Also, many of us will be applying for fellowship at which point the applicant pools become much smaller especially within a given program, thus one becomes much easier to identify.Some people don't want others to know who they are on the internet. Not too surprising, really, considering the fact that you have to work with the people at your residency for three years.
If I saw an incoming resident trash my program and I had ranked it number 1, don't you think I would start hating that person pretty much immediately? If I can identify them, I have a definite object for my hate.
Some people don't want others to know who they are on the internet. Not too surprising, really, considering the fact that you have to work with the people at your residency for three years.
If I saw an incoming resident trash my program and I had ranked it number 1, don't you think I would start hating that person pretty much immediately? If I can identify them, I have a definite object for my hate.
If you care that much what a rando on the internet thinks, even if you can identify them, then that's another issue altogether.
As far as the fellowship pool bit goes, trust me when I say that you won't care particularly much when applying as to what X person on the Internet says or does. There's a lot less obsessing and agonizing like there is for residency in the sub-forums. I went through this process myself recently so...
WAMC thread had 405 posts this year. Help Me Rank thread had 718. This thread has <100 with only 1/2-2/3 of them being match results.
Seems about right.
I've done it in the past. Usually results in 1 or 2 responses.wonder how many responses you would get if you sent out a "gentle reminder" to those who posted in those threads to post in this one or offering to post anonymously for them ....may be worth a try
I've done it in the past. Usually results in 1 or 2 responses.
If they cared, they'd be here.Maybe try unlocking the help me rank thread and "reminding" people to post their results in this thread. You're likely to reach a large audience who posted/subscribed to that thread.
School: Carib IMG
Step Scores: Step 1 26os, Step 2 270s, CS Pass
Grades: A's M1-M2, Honors in everything MS3 except Ob
Research: Poster presentation
AOA: Non-existent for IMGs
Rank: 5%
Interview Invites: Cleveland clinic, Dartmouth, Georgetown, Washington hospital center, Lenox hill, Beth Israel, St. Luke's-Roosevelt, Jacobi, Norwalk, Stamford hospital, Stony Brook, UArizona, UConn, UMaryland Midtown, UMass, Winthrop
Canceled Invites: Albany medical center, Arrowhead regional medical center, Bridgeport hospital, FAU, Jersey Shore University, Kern medical center, Lincoln, Maimonides, NYP Queens, Newark Beth Israel, NYU Lutheran, Orlando health, Roger Williams, Rutgers NJMS, Santa barbara cottage, SUNY downstate, SUNY upstate, UHawaii, UNevada, UOklahoma Tulsa, Wycoff, Waterbury Yale
Rejections: As an IMG too many to list (~60)
Matched (+ # on ROL): Dartmouth, #2
Advice:
1) Did not realize that interviews are given regionally, I had a NYC address at the time, but ultimately did not want to end up in the city
2) Definitely worth it to swallow your pride and email interest to programs that you haven't heard from yet
3) A lot of people will tell you the personal statement is irrelevant, but mine was brought up in 15/16 of my interviews
What IM getting competitive to me meant:Hey guys.. Rising M3 here so just starting to get into this enigma and I have perhaps a stupid question... In the last charting published about the CO 2014, it says that IM US seniors basically have a 80% chance of matching just by passing boards (in addition to some other basic qualifications I'm sure).. I realize SDN is "right-shifted" with stat-posters, but when you guys say IM is getting "competitive" what does that exactly mean? Because the data (although, it says the avg IM matched had step 1 of 230), is pretty reassuring that most US seniors will match in IM if they so desire (albeit it may be in less-desirable areas) with basic qualifications and enough ranks in the specialty? Thanks! Congrats on your terrific matches.
Hey guys.. Rising M3 here so just starting to get into this enigma and I have perhaps a stupid question... In the last charting published about the CO 2014, it says that IM US seniors basically have a 80% chance of matching just by passing boards (in addition to some other basic qualifications I'm sure).. I realize SDN is "right-shifted" with stat-posters, but when you guys say IM is getting "competitive" what does that exactly mean? Because the data (although, it says the avg IM matched had step 1 of 230), is pretty reassuring that most US seniors will match in IM if they so desire (albeit it may be in less-desirable areas) with basic qualifications and enough ranks in the specialty? Thanks! Congrats on your terrific matches.