- Joined
- Jul 2, 2013
- Messages
- 11,658
- Reaction score
- 15,599
funny you should reference them... I saw these earlier this week. It's ummm, an interesting marketing strategy.
Ugh, the message behind those are legitimately cringeworthy. Just one more reason not to settle down there...
Wait the boards test knowledge base? I thought they test more than just that and focuses on applied knowledge, critical thinking etc. with questions of various levels of complexity. That's why people over on Step 1 forums say knowledge base alone isn't sufficient to do well on the exam.
This is also why doing well on the MCAT correlates to doing well on Step exams. Critical thinking, test taking skills, innate intelligence etc. transfer between standardized tests easily.
They do, but there's a difference between applying knowledge to various situations on paper and applying those same skills and knowledge irl. Example question:
A 65 y.o. female presents to your clinic complaining of dyspnea on exertion that has progressed over the past several months. On physical exam her pulse is 68/min, BP is 110/78, and resp. rate is 16. Auscultation shows a grade II/VI systolic ejection murmur heard loudest at the right upper sternal border that radiates to the neck. There are no carotid bruits heard and no peripheral edema is noted. What's the most likely diagnosis?
On paper it's a really straightforward question when you see the multiple choice (obviously aortic stenosis). Irl it's a more difficult question as one has to take an adequate history, have strong enough clinical skills to notice a grade 2 murmur as well as the features of the murmur (where is it heard best? Is it systolic or diastolic? Is it ejection? Crescendo-decrescendo? Holosystolic? Pansystolic? Is it a clicking sound? A hum? A whoosh? Does it radiate? Etc.), and rule out other conditions on the differential diagnosis list (COPD, asthma, cardiac ischemia/CAD, etc.). A person can have the strongest foundational knowledge one could want, but if they can't hear the murmur they're completely useless to this patient irl.
The same thing can be said for identifying a lot of symptoms. Is a person delusional or just making an exaggeration/explaining something poorly? I had a psych patient that said "invented" a certain pet breed. We all thought he/she was completely out of it because he/she was making claims that she invented this breed, became a millionaire, and lost everything then became basically homeless. I looked the patient up online and it turned out he/she wasn't lying at all. If I hadn't looked it up, we may have misdiagnosed her as having a condition with psychotic features when her thought process was completely normal. Being able to gather the proper information is a completely separate skillset that (written) standardized exams don't test for but is essential for strong physicians to have.
The tl;dr is that the boards do test for more than just foundational knowledge, but they don't test for every skill necessary to be a strong, or even adequate physician.