Newly Elected ASTRO President Opened RadOnc Residency Program in last 5 years

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
C

Chartreuse Wombat

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Joined
May 7, 2014
Messages
1,663
Reaction score
3,488

Dr. Geraldine Jacobson elected as future Chair of the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) - American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) - American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO)

Geraldine Jacobson, MD, MPH, MBA, FASTRO, will begin her term as President-elect of the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) in October 2020
www.astro.org www.astro.org

Hard to imagine what her view on further expansion is...
Members don't see this ad.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Chartreuse Wombat said:

Dr. Geraldine Jacobson elected as future Chair of the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) - American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) - American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO)

Geraldine Jacobson, MD, MPH, MBA, FASTRO, will begin her term as President-elect of the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) in October 2020
www.astro.org www.astro.org

Hard to imagine what her view on further expansion is...
Click to expand...

Yup, racial justice is clearly the #1 priority for our field. No doubt about it - not contributing to the cure of cancer!

"In her tenure as President-elect and eventual Chair of ASTRO, Dr. Jacobson will draw on her advanced education in public health and business to address priority areas including diversity and racial justice within the oncology workforce, the impact of COVID-19 on cancer care, and patient health equity."
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Members don't see this ad :)
When I'm talking to chairs who lead expanding residency programs centers in major cities, I hear "They need more of the best trained rad oncs from major centers for the rural parts of the country since we hear there's an undersupply there."

Then when I talk to chairs from more rural parts of the country, I hear "We need to train more rad oncs within our underserved area so they will stay in rural parts of the country and better understand the unique challenges of those communities."

So in her case, I'm sure it's the latter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
West Virginia has a residency program?
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 2 users
RickyScott said:
It is an hour or so drive from
Upitt/Allegheny
Click to expand...
And if that wasn't enough, Penn State thinks they need one too for central PA


The new Department of Radiation Oncology is developing a residency program, as well as training programs in medical physics, which will increase the number of health professionals to care for our own patients while addressing the shortage of these kind of experts across the nation.
Click to expand...
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Dislike
Reactions: 2 users
How is this not gaslighting? It's the very definition of it.

Oh, you think there's an over supply problem? Let's elect as chair the dept head of a brand new program (with 2 linacs at one site, and one linac at a "satellite") within 90 miles of two pre existing programs (UPMC, Allegheny) in the middle of massive expansion of residents with decreasing radiation indications/fractions. The gas light is not on, you're the crazy one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 users
Neuronix said:
When I'm talking to chairs who lead expanding residency programs centers in major cities, I hear "They need more of the best trained rad oncs from major centers for the rural parts of the country since we hear there's an undersupply there."
Click to expand...
Why in holy hell can they talk fixing undersupply, and doing expansion, and it be OK; but illegal/antitrust to talk oversupply and retracting spots. It’s only antitrust if it’s anti- one’s position, I trust?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6 users
scarbrtj said:
Why in holy hell can they talk fixing undersupply, and doing expansion, and it be OK; but illegal/antitrust to talk oversupply and retracting spots. It’s only antitrust if it’s anti- one’s position, I trust?
Click to expand...
Duh...i mean hallahan didn't sit there and openly talk about cutting faculty salaries in the red journal for nothing
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Members don't see this ad :)
As one sdner likes to put it: tragedy of the commons. Every program wants more residents independently and no central agency regulates supply and demand. They're not colluding in this, it's just in most chairs best interests to have more residents.

Dr. Golden in our other thread has invited us to sit on committees. I know this because I do sit on committees. In the last 5 years I've had discussions with almost every scarop lead and a bunch of other chairs and PDs.

If anyone mentions job market to them, a willful ignorance kicks in, and like any other politician they change the subject or say something that isn't true then dominate the discussion until you're out of time.

Again, the only reason we're getting any notice is because application numbers are down. SDN gets the blame for that in their minds...

This isn't everyone obviously. Just painting in broad strokes here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
ASTRO has your back. I promise. Keep paying your dues please.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 1 user
Neuronix said:
As one sdner likes to put it: tragedy of the commons. Every program wants more residents independently and no central agency regulates supply and demand. They're not colluding in this, it's just in most chairs best interests to have more residents.

Dr. Golden in our other thread has invited us to sit on committees. I know this because I do sit on committees. In the last 5 years I've had discussions with almost every scarop lead and a bunch of other chairs and PDs.

If anyone mentions job market to them, a willful ignorance kicks in, and like any other politician they change the subject or say something that isn't true then dominate the discussion until you're out of time.

Again, the only reason we're getting any notice is because application numbers are down. SDN gets the blame for that in their minds...

This isn't everyone obviously. Just painting in broad strokes here.
Click to expand...
It must have been like trying to discuss slavery with the southern states in Congress pre-1860s.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Be sure to sign up for the enhanced Zoom meeting incredible, immersive superfantastic Annual meeting as well
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 1 users
I've said this before but I'm on my second read through Nassim Taleb's Skin in the Game and it's smacking me in the face the parallels here....

1. The whole radiation oncology residency expansion is so well juxtaposed with the points in the book. There is so much asymmetry in decision making - as noted above the people that benefit (chairs/existing practices potentially) are the de facto decision makers. And they only gain from more residents.

2. The people making these decisions suffer no consequences when things go wrong. There is no connection between the decisions made and the consequences of these decision. " Bureaucracy is a construction designed to maximize covering the ass of a decision-maker from the risks of the decision ."

The whole legal concern is a charade for cowards to hide behind. If this were a concern we'd see the cash cow fields like derm and plastics be sued left and right to open up residency slots. Such a case has never been decided by a judge/jury to my knowledge, so there is zero legal precedent and it's all speculation as to what the case law would be here. As scarbrtj is saying above, if they're allowed to manipulate the supply to "fix" a geographic maldistribution problem, why are they not able to manipulate supply when we have an over abundance of rad oncs? How is the simple legal argument not - we don't need rad oncs, the public health would be better served with these med students doing family medicine (insert other area of need)?

/rant
 
  • Like
Reactions: 8 users
Anti-trust was, is, and always has been the equivalent of being confronted with a fight, yelling “hey, what’s that?” while pointing to the sky, and then running away when the other guy looks up.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 5 users
Mandelin Rain said:
Anti-trust was, is, and always has been the equivalent of being confronted with a fight, yelling “hey, what’s that?” while pointing to the sky, and then running away when the other guy looks up.
Click to expand...

I would gladly fund the legal defense with all the money I'd save if they got rid of SA-CME's.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 1 user
The chief anti-competitive behavior in rad onc is over training physicians to drive salaries down. The chairman of Wash U admitted this in a peer reviewed journal. If one could demonstrate that Hallahan colluded with other leaders to expand residencies as a means to wage fix, it'd be a BIG story. Wash U is a private university and as such is likely exempt from FOIA requests, but many (most) other chair persons, that he may have contacted about this issue around the same time he published it in our specialty's primary journal, are not exempt from FOIA requests. Just saying.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 3 users
Clown bully Washu trash chair who ran a hit job on his own faculty, is hands down one of the worst guys in our field.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Anyone see Randalls response from UK on the ASTRO forum about how he was looking for proof there was an over supply...these people just have their head in the sand.
 
  • Angry
  • Haha
Reactions: 1 users
You must log in or register to reply here.
Next unread thread

Similar threads

C
Congrats to new ASTRO President..is this the first time that the President is on SDN?
2
Replies
62
Views
4K
sirspamalot
sirspamalot
GapCalc
ASTRO CEO retiring
Replies
2
Views
728
RSAOaky
R
thesauce
ASTRO vs. ACRO
2
Replies
57
Views
3K
RadOncDoc21
RadOncDoc21
Y
ASTRO 2023
2 3
Replies
148
Views
9K
NotMattSpraker
N
TheWallnerus
ASTRO Supervision Town Hall 📣☢
Replies
5
Views
860
TheWallnerus
TheWallnerus
Top