This is false. I sent a program a LOI and the PC emailed me back and said my board score was beneath their preference. I clarified what score they were talking about because my STEP is pretty good. I was floored when they replied back with a COMLEX number. This program has a DO in a high level authority. I do believe this stuff matters.
Who knows maybe I go unmatched and have to soap but the default advice of STEP 1 (specifically for neurology) is outdated by one cycle. We do not have aggregate data for STEP P/F. I understand giving this advice for someone in my cycle but for an applicant post 23/24 cycle we can just wait for the data.
I had a belief their was a bias of self fulfilling prophecy when people said “you’ll get screened out” and I was smooth brained enough to test out my hunch with my own app… I mean my dude, we’re talking neuro here. It’s not even a backup for anything and almost no one wants to do it.
But honestly I feel I’m the dude arguing why we don’t need to get a D-dimer after someone PERC’ed out… we all know we’re going to get the DD in the end, and everyone will still pay a grand to get a P on their transcript.