- Joined
- Oct 22, 2008
- Messages
- 192
- Reaction score
- 14
Just finished all 32 pages! Wow, some great stories here - loved reading them.
Bump!
Bump!
One interviewer handed me an apple seed, and asked "is it dead, or alive, and explain to me why"...
And that's why they lost the war.Just finished this whole thread and thought I'd sort of contribute.
For undergrad I applied to a prominent British university. I should mention that I had a great time with my US interviewers and even though I knew it would be hard abroad... well it went like this:
Interviewer: Here's a diagram. Explain how you would redesign/renovate to reduce heat retention on the 2nd floor.
Me: Uhhhhhh [blank] *makes up some random crap*
Interviewer (in obnoxious Brit accent): Do they not teach you physics in America?
Interviewer: How do you think you will be able to afford our tuition and living costs?
Me: My parents are committed to supporting my education and if I need to, I am fully prepared to take out a loan...
Interviewer: I simply doubt your ability to finance your education, given your family background. Do you have any questions for us? [without pause] Please inform the next candidate that we will be ready for him shortly.
I should mention that my interviewer's title was SIR something, which definitely stressed me out a little bit... Not to mention that for whatever reason, all their doors were A FOOT SHORTER THAN ME (I'm 5'7") and I was seriously like... are these designed for house elves??? I had to duck to get into the room.
Needless to say I was rejected... but I got into both the US schools I applied to so it's all good
One interviewer handed me an apple seed, and asked "is it dead, or alive, and explain to me why"...
This is probably not all that bizarre of a moment, but I had a tour of the anatomy lab on my last interview. I was so lost in my thoughts recounting the interview I just had that I completely didn't prepare myself for entering in the lab. When I went in, a few of the cadavers were uncovered and had been very much dissected already. It was the first dead body I had even seen, so it was a bit of a shock. I didn't get sick or anything, it was just really strange and surreal an experience. I kept staring at them while the student tour guide was talking. Was anyone else taken by surprise when entering in the anatomy lab for the first time?
Was anyone else taken by surprise when entering in the anatomy lab for the first time?
This is probably not all that bizarre of a moment, but I had a tour of the anatomy lab on my last interview. I was so lost in my thoughts recounting the interview I just had that I completely didn't prepare myself for entering in the lab. When I went in, a few of the cadavers were uncovered and had been very much dissected already. It was the first dead body I had even seen, so it was a bit of a shock. I didn't get sick or anything, it was just really strange and surreal an experience. I kept staring at them while the student tour guide was talking. Was anyone else taken by surprise when entering in the anatomy lab for the first time?
Yeah! I felt like the only one who was, too... another interviewee was like "haha, this is your first time seeing cadavers!?" This room seriously had about 20 of them - there was a class in there, so they were all open and being poked and prodded. I was worried that out of nowhere I might faint or puke or something, but I managed to keep my cool
This is probably not all that bizarre of a moment, but I had a tour of the anatomy lab on my last interview. I was so lost in my thoughts recounting the interview I just had that I completely didn't prepare myself for entering in the lab. When I went in, a few of the cadavers were uncovered and had been very much dissected already. It was the first dead body I had even seen, so it was a bit of a shock. I didn't get sick or anything, it was just really strange and surreal an experience. I kept staring at them while the student tour guide was talking. Was anyone else taken by surprise when entering in the anatomy lab for the first time?
Had the most ridiculous interview last Friday. EVERYTHING possible happened.
1. They told me the wrong building to go to. Had to walk to the right one.
2. The dean came up to my breakfast table and said, "you know, if this doesn't go well...we can always do a second interview."
3. The welcome ceremony guy said "I'm just a jaded old doctor, and you're all so idealistic..."
4. It was hot.
5. It started raining while I was walking between buildings in my suit.
6. Interviews were all over campus.
7. Walking outdoor tours--forgot to bring comfortable shoes.
8. Tried to shake my first interviewer's hand, but he had Dupuytren's or something.... "my hands are deformed" is all he (curtly) said!
9. My tour guide was less than enthusiastic.
10. No gross anatomy lab tour.
11. No SIM center tour.
12. Their microphones didn't work during the presentations
13. The student panel was too tired/jaded/something to sell their school!
Student Interviewer: So what do you like to do for fun?
Me: Well, I like to run, it's a great stress reliever and it's great to get outside, blah blah blah
Student Interviewer: Yeah I like to run too but my knees always hurt when I run
Me: Yeah it's all about running on the balls of your feet, it really makes a difference
Student Interviewer: Oh really?
Me: Yeah I've never had knee problems because in cross country my coach taught me to run on my balls.
Student interviewer: ....
Me:
I fail to see what's wrong with this... Although, it's impossible to know if your lack of knee problems is genetic, environmental, etc.. But still... I don't get it?
..
Me: Yeah I've never had knee problems because in cross country my coach taught me to run on my balls.
Me:
I've emphasized the important part for your benefit.
This is probably not all that bizarre of a moment, but I had a tour of the anatomy lab on my last interview. I was so lost in my thoughts recounting the interview I just had that I completely didn't prepare myself for entering in the lab. When I went in, a few of the cadavers were uncovered and had been very much dissected already. It was the first dead body I had even seen, so it was a bit of a shock. I didn't get sick or anything, it was just really strange and surreal an experience. I kept staring at them while the student tour guide was talking. Was anyone else taken by surprise when entering in the anatomy lab for the first time?
I had an interview at my top choice last week. However, i was a little alarmed by one of them. the first thing this interviewer said was "you must've taken ___________ class before." It was a closed interview and the class he mentioned wasn't even a required pre-med course. He just happened to do research in this field. He then started asking me if there were any professors in my school he could contact since he wants to teach at the university I go to. It went on for about 5 minutes of him trying to extract information to benefit himself. The medical school I interviewed at is a really great research institution, so I don't know why'd he be interested in teaching at my university (it's not as well funded as the medical school). He did mention that he didn't currently have a grant and that he had past faculty positions in other universities (so much moving around...) I just felt like he wasn't really interested in me. When I wrote him a thank you email showing my gratitude and highlight what we've talked about (which wasn't much), all he said in his reply was "Thanks...could you give me the name of the professor again?" without reference to anything interview relevant at all. Is this crossing the line? Or am I looking into it too much?
lol you were at UTMB
This wasn't necessarily bizarre, just nerve-wracking:
faculty interviewer: Before we end, there's one thing that really concerns me about you.
me: *holds breath in silent terror*
interviewer: What's up with your football team!? (I went to USC.)
me: *huuuuge sigh of relief*
BUMP! It's interview season, guys! You must have more crazy stories than this...
At my recent interview, completely out of the blue:
Interviewer: "How many meals do you think a mother has to feed her child from birth to age 18?"
Me: "Uhhhhhhhh....define 'meal'?"
Even now, looking back on the entire interview, I can't for the life of me figure out a context for that question.
BUMP! It's interview season, guys! You must have more crazy stories than this...
At my recent interview, completely out of the blue:
Interviewer: "How many meals do you think a mother has to feed her child from birth to age 18?"
Me: "Uhhhhhhhh....define 'meal'?"
Even now, looking back on the entire interview, I can't for the life of me figure out a context for that question.
Reminds me of management consulting/i-banking interviews, except in those there are 2-3 people staring at you and expect you to eventually come to a final quantitative answer.Some interviewers like to ask questions like these (I kind of think they are stupid, since the interviewer is in a position of power and the true purpose of the question isn't obvious).
They are looking for you to demonstrate basic reasoning. A "correct" answer would have been:
"Well, I assume that the average person eats 3 meals a day. There are 365 days in a year, so 18 times 365 is the number of days the mother would have to feed her child. Multiply this answer by 3 and get your answer."
Some interviewers are also looking for you to make quick approximations, like "There are about 400 days in a year, and 18 is close to 20 so 400 times 20 = 8000 days of feeding her child times 3 meals per day = about 24000 meals."
Variations on this question I have seen are:
1) How many quarters would you have to stack up to reach the top of the Empire state building?
2) How many medical students are in the US currently?
etc.
Actual #s or details like "children under 3 eat about five meals a day, while children over 3 eat about 3 meals a day" aren't important. They are looking for you to quickly and confidently explain how you would solve the problem (with approximations if necessary).
Some interviewers like to ask questions like these (I kind of think they are stupid, since the interviewer is in a position of power and the true purpose of the question isn't obvious).
They are looking for you to demonstrate basic reasoning. A "correct" answer would have been:
"Well, I assume that the average person eats 3 meals a day. There are 365 days in a year, so 18 times 365 is the number of days the mother would have to feed her child. Multiply this answer by 3 and get your answer."
Some interviewers are also looking for you to make quick approximations, like "There are about 400 days in a year, and 18 is close to 20 so 400 times 20 = 8000 days of feeding her child times 3 meals per day = about 24000 meals."
Variations on this question I have seen are:
1) How many quarters would you have to stack up to reach the top of the Empire state building?
2) How many medical students are in the US currently?
etc.
Actual #s or details like "children under 3 eat about five meals a day, while children over 3 eat about 3 meals a day" aren't important. They are looking for you to quickly and confidently explain how you would solve the problem (with approximations if necessary).
yea i wouldve answered the meal question like how you did. it seems for other questions you would have to have to beforehand knowledge, unless the interviewers give you this info.
You're right that it seems that way, and that's why I think the questions are unfair. When you are asked them your immediate focus is, "Oh crap, I have no idea how tall the Empire State Building is." Furthermore, most students are afraid to ask, "Do you just want me to make up some numbers?" because the interviewer is in the authority position.
But they don't actually care about that. The intent is for you to just come up with random numbers and "guestimate" the answer. Like, "Well, my room is 15ft tall and the empire state building is probably about 50 stories so it is 50x15 ft and there are probably about 50 quarters in 1 ft." Or something.
Yea. For example if you're asked "how many golf balls can fit in a school bus" can you ask for the size of a golf ball? What are the reference points?yea i wouldve answered the meal question like how you did. it seems for other questions you would have to have to beforehand knowledge, unless the interviewers give you this info.
Regardless, these are stupid questions for an interview. This is why we all took the MCAT and knocked out pre-req's.
I would have asked if the child was incapable of feeding himself? Because, if not, I would say the child was capable of feeding him/herself by the age of 3, which makes the calculations much closer to 1k meals. What he defines as feeding a child? Like Rhesus stated, what is considered a meal(This could be breast milk, in utero, a raisin, etc.)? I would have continued to ask defining questions until you could nail a pretty simple straightforward answer. I would have done this to point out the ridiculous nature of the question.
These are all valid points, and that's why I said earlier that I think this type of questioning in unfair.
Ultimately, any answer you give should be fine as long as you are confident and back it up, even if that answer is, "I don't have the data to accurately answer that question." The interview is mostly just trying to trip you up and see how you react to an unexpected question. And again, just to re-iterate, I think it's a bad/stupid/whatever. I'm just trying to explain what they are trying to figure out by asking you such a question.
Some interviewers like to ask questions like these (I kind of think they are stupid, since the interviewer is in a position of power and the true purpose of the question isn't obvious).
They are looking for you to demonstrate basic reasoning. A "correct" answer would have been:
"Well, I assume that the average person eats 3 meals a day. There are 365 days in a year, so 18 times 365 is the number of days the mother would have to feed her child. Multiply this answer by 3 and get your answer."
Some interviewers are also looking for you to make quick approximations, like "There are about 400 days in a year, and 18 is close to 20 so 400 times 20 = 8000 days of feeding her child times 3 meals per day = about 24000 meals."
Variations on this question I have seen are:
1) How many quarters would you have to stack up to reach the top of the Empire state building?
2) How many medical students are in the US currently?
etc.
Actual #s or details like "children under 3 eat about five meals a day, while children over 3 eat about 3 meals a day" aren't important. They are looking for you to quickly and confidently explain how you would solve the problem (with approximations if necessary).
Some interviewers like to ask questions like these (I kind of think they are stupid, since the interviewer is in a position of power and the true purpose of the question isn't obvious).
They are looking for you to demonstrate basic reasoning. A "correct" answer would have been:
"Well, I assume that the average person eats 3 meals a day. There are 365 days in a year, so 18 times 365 is the number of days the mother would have to feed her child. Multiply this answer by 3 and get your answer."
Some interviewers are also looking for you to make quick approximations, like "There are about 400 days in a year, and 18 is close to 20 so 400 times 20 = 8000 days of feeding her child times 3 meals per day = about 24000 meals."
Variations on this question I have seen are:
1) How many quarters would you have to stack up to reach the top of the Empire state building?
2) How many medical students are in the US currently?
etc.
Actual #s or details like "children under 3 eat about five meals a day, while children over 3 eat about 3 meals a day" aren't important. They are looking for you to quickly and confidently explain how you would solve the problem (with approximations if necessary).
Interviewer: What type of artistic endeavors are you interested in? Do you play an instrument?
Ktl: No, no instrument, but I do love to get creative in the kitchen.. baking, cooking, blah, blah, blah..
Interviewer: Oh I love to cook, as you can tell (he's a large guy and proceeds to rub his belly)
Ktl: Very cool (um)
Interviewer: Just the other day, my wife brought home a duck in a plastic bag that someone had shot. Have you ever cooked a duck before?
Ktl: No..
Interviewer: Well first you've got to pluck it and then get rid of the down.. You hold the duck by the neck and dip it into a bucket with hot water and paraffin. Then take it out and put it in a bucket of cold water, pull off the paraffin and the down comes with it.
Ktl: Oh, interesting.
Interviewer: Next you've got to get rid of the gaminess. You can stuff it with sauerkraut or apple or lemon....
Ktl: (wtf?)
He proceeded to go on and on about the different types of duck you can eat.. how the Chinese prepare duck...
It was extremely odd.