Mistaken Identity in the ED

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

Vandalia

Full Member
7+ Year Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2014
Messages
938
Reaction score
1,539
I came across the following case and thought it would be worth posting here:

"Eugene Wright of Meadville says police and medical workers got the wrong man when they transported him to the local hospital this summer and injected him with anti-psychotic drugs against his will, thinking he was someone else.
...
Mr. Wright had the misfortune to have the same name as another Eugene Wright, a psychiatric patient who police said had issued threats at his doctor's office, his suit says.
...
But everyone refused to verify his identity, he said. And if he didn't cooperate, he said, the police officers threatened to hold him down so the drugs could be injected by a nurse. He didn't want to be restrained so, after 10 minutes of arguing, he let the nurse inject him.

After that, according to the complaint, "things were starting to get pretty fuzzy."



Man says he was injected with anti-psychotic drugs in mistaken identity case

Clinical pearl: Always at least check the date-of-birth, especially when a patient tells you they aren't who you think they are. (And even "crazy people" can be right.)

And while the $50 & $25 gift cards were a nice gesture, they will not save you from a lawsuit (and can be taken as acknowledgement of damages and causation.)

Members don't see this ad.
 
Patient denies his very identity and can’t even get his birthdate correct. This would confirm need for commital even more.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Members don't see this ad :)
Patient denies his very identity and can’t even get his birthdate correct. This would confirm need for commital even more.

I think there was an entire novel on that very principle: Catch-23 ... Catch-72... something like that.

More seriously the suit will almost certainly end up as a merry-go-around with everyone attempting to shift liability to the entity to their left.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
I think there was an entire novel on that very principle: Catch-23 ... Catch-72... something like that.

Catch-22. Joseph Heller.
The premise behind the phrase is that one had to be crazy to keep flying bombing missions (set in WWII), but you had to be certifiably crazy to be excluded from missions... and as soon as you asked to be excluded, you wouldn't be crazy anymore. The name came from the bureaucratic/military rules.
Not exactly a true Kobayashi Maru, but in the same vein.
 
Top