A table of contents does not typically contain the necessary vocabulary and really is just a list of the chapters or sections given at the front of a book. Even for psych, it is missing a significant amount of specific vocab or names that may show up on your test (e.g. rare psych terms).
Keep in mind that AAMC also asks questions on material that isn't in the study guide on purpose to see how you can manipulate new information in the context of an experimental passage (ex: novel/obscure chemistry experiments). Having everything on the content list down is a good start, but you need to move onto knocking out FLs. This exam will not spoon-feed you.
That particular BB section contains the concept of cell structure, which is completely related to hydrophobicity and hydrophilicity of amino acids. Also, AAMC flashcards are not a comprehensive list of topics and this is why I don't recommend the flashcards as they build false confidence and people are upset when they're not comprehensive; they are just high-yield concepts and vocab. Since the outline doesn't explicitly state know the vocab term "hydropathic index", in my experience, you should be able to gather what it is referring to by reading the passage/context in which it is mentioned. That is, this is likely to be explained by a passage and I'd bet it wouldn't be discrete.
That being said, get better used to ambiguity and AAMC forming questions about something you've learned in ways you've never seen before. Don't let reading the table of contents / using flashcards prevent you from digging deep into BB study resources, practice questions, and practical applications i.e. what type of research utilizes hydropathic indices. In my biochem courses, hydropathic index came up several times but never came up in my formal study.
Good luck!