While I love ragging on my residency institution, I do understand how this happens.
RadOnc was born in academia, and it attracts certain personalities. Namely, people who, on average, care about intangible accolades and their reputation amongst their peers to a significant degree (gross generalization, I know). Departments develop a culture and practice patterns, and institutional inertia is incredibly powerful. Medicine is also inherently conservative. Thus, new trials and evidence are published, but people might be slow to adopt novel or different data if senior leaders ("the cool kids") don't adopt it themselves. Going against dogma is very difficult to do in many academic environments, and Radiation Oncology, being so small, seems to suffer from this Mean Girls clique syndrome more than other specialties.
Basically, the nail that sticks out gets hammered down.
So, practice patterns change at a glacier pace. Enter: medical students and residents, who must pass through these environments. We're taught "this is the one and true correct way", and don't have the perspective (or power) to challenge these things.
It's why breast patients are told not to wear deodorant, or why head and neck patients are only prescribed Silvadene very reluctantly at the very end of a treatment course, if at all. I can immediately think of at least four therapeutic schemes that the culture of my residency institution told me was the "correct" way to treat, which I eventually came to learn was just "like, their opinion, man", and other institutions did something else - and their patients seem to do fine.
It is what it is. I assume every specialty has variations of this? I mean...I hope they do.