- Joined
- Jul 11, 2001
- Messages
- 378
- Reaction score
- 1
Hi! I have been reading my material for class, and I have a few questions that seem to puzzle me.
I read in an a&p book that the T and b cells are not determined directly by antigens, but rather that the antigen affects the expression of certain genes. So my question is, do we have inherent in our genes the immunity to all possible antigens (or at least all the ones we can defend against) are no antigens ?totally? new?
I was reading in Guyton and hall about the crossed extensor reflex, and it was saying (at least in the illustration) that if you put a hot stimulus on one hand, it will flexed, but the other hand will extend?? I understand this for the legs (you would want to extend the other leg for balance), but does this really happen with the hands. All the tiems I can think of with myself, this doesn?t come to mind. Does anyone know what G&H was trying to say, or should I try it on myself
In OMM Class, when trying to explain strain-counterstrain, the instructor gave examples of muscle spindles and golgi tendon. He said that the Golgi tendon acted like the Course chair, while he was like the muscle spindle : the golgi tendon only came into effect if the muscle spindle couldn?t do enough.
But recently, I had to read about muscle spindles and Golgi tendon organs for class, and I read in Guyton and Hall that The muscle spindle is activated when the muscle is extended too much and the Golgi tendon is activated if you contract to fast. So are they controlling factors for the opposite imbalances, and less complementary to each other than they are in opposition.
So whose right? Or am I misinterpreting G&H.
All your responses are greatly appreciated.
I read in an a&p book that the T and b cells are not determined directly by antigens, but rather that the antigen affects the expression of certain genes. So my question is, do we have inherent in our genes the immunity to all possible antigens (or at least all the ones we can defend against) are no antigens ?totally? new?
I was reading in Guyton and hall about the crossed extensor reflex, and it was saying (at least in the illustration) that if you put a hot stimulus on one hand, it will flexed, but the other hand will extend?? I understand this for the legs (you would want to extend the other leg for balance), but does this really happen with the hands. All the tiems I can think of with myself, this doesn?t come to mind. Does anyone know what G&H was trying to say, or should I try it on myself
In OMM Class, when trying to explain strain-counterstrain, the instructor gave examples of muscle spindles and golgi tendon. He said that the Golgi tendon acted like the Course chair, while he was like the muscle spindle : the golgi tendon only came into effect if the muscle spindle couldn?t do enough.
But recently, I had to read about muscle spindles and Golgi tendon organs for class, and I read in Guyton and Hall that The muscle spindle is activated when the muscle is extended too much and the Golgi tendon is activated if you contract to fast. So are they controlling factors for the opposite imbalances, and less complementary to each other than they are in opposition.
So whose right? Or am I misinterpreting G&H.
All your responses are greatly appreciated.