Additional thoughts
In a lot of the national "chains," there is not a lot of hypofractionation,
Adjusting to
hypofractionation and new reimbursement models, by enlarging your residency program as these authors have done
Radiation Oncology Practice: Adjusting to a New Reimbursement Model. - PubMed - NCBI
Send to
J Oncol Pract. 2016 May;12(5):e576-83. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2015.007385. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
Radiation Oncology Practice: Adjusting to a New Reimbursement Model.
Konski A1,
Yu JB1,
Freedman G1,
Harrison LB1,
Johnstone PA2.
Author information
1
Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania; Leonard Davis Institute for Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT; and Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL.
2
Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania; Leonard Davis Institute for Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT; and Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
[email protected].
Abstract
PURPOSE:
Use of hypofractionation is increasing in radiation oncology because of several factors. The effects of increasing hypofractionation use on departments and staff currently based on fee-for-service models are not well studied.
METHODS:
We modeled the effects of moving to hypofractionation for prostate, breast, and lung cancer and palliative treatments in a typical-sized hospital-based radiation oncology department. Year 2015 relative value unit (RVU) data were used to determine changes in reimbursement. The change in number of fractions was used to model the effects on machine volume, staff time, and workforce predictions.
RESULTS:
The per-case marginal reduction in technical revenue was $1,777, $4,297, $9,041, and $9,498 for palliative and breast, prostate, and lung cancer cases, respectively. The physician reduction per case in RVUs was 5.22, 10.44, 43.02, and 43.02 respectively. A department could anticipate an annual reduction in technical revenue of $540,661 and a reduction in workflow of approximately five patients or 1 to 1.5 hours per day from a hypofractionation rate of 40%.
CONCLUSION:
The move to hypofractionation in the United States will lead to increased pressures on departments to address budget shortfalls resulting from the decrease in per-patient revenue. This may be done through a combination of an increase in patient volume, recognition of the increased skill sets required to deliver hypofractionated radiotherapy, delay in capital purchases, and/or reduction in staff. In a value-based environment, these evolutions should improve the value proposition of radiation oncology over a fee-for-service model.
Copyright © 2016 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.