- Joined
- Nov 21, 1998
- Messages
- 12,595
- Reaction score
- 7,026
The Insurance Coverage Bioethics Dilemma - Regenexx
Regenexx offers non-surgical, regenerative orthopedic treatment options for pain related to osteoarthritis, joint injuries, overuse conditions, spine pain, and common sports injuries.
regenexx.com
"The only way that I can see that the doctor would be able to avoid a serious medical ethics dilemma (and a possible malpractice case) by steering a patient toward covered care of a bad or “less good” solution is with expanded informed consent. That means that the doctor goes out of his or her way and documents that they have discussed with the patient that they are choosing a worse option for treatment based solely on insurance. That would include not only a written document but a documented extensive discussion back and forth with the patient. That would also require the patient to acknowledge in writing that this conversation took place and that they are choosing the worse option solely because it’s covered.
The upshot? I can find no way that medical bioethics would allow for steroid injections in knees or SI joint fusions as part of routine care given that there are better options with high-level research support. However, despite this, these procedures remain common. The question we need to ask ourselves is, why?"